mosassam writes:
I am genuinely trying explore the intuitive feeling I have that, far from being a by-product, Life is, in some as yet unspecified way, the 'driving force' behind [...] complexity and not the other way round.
Ever since Darwin we know quite well what the driving force behind the increasing complexity of life on earth is: it's Darwinian evolution. This suggests another interesting way of defining life, for which I'll quote
Gerald Joyce (look under the heading "Proposed", a bit further down):
"
Life is a self-sustained chemical system capable of undergoing Darwinian evolution."
Whether one could take this one step further and include
any such system, not just chemical ones, is a matter of debate. Speaking for myself, I would be inclined to view a computer simulation in the form of a genetic algorithm as genuine evolution, but I would not go so far as to call it life.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science." - Charles Darwin.