Author: Jar
Forum: Is It Science?
Thread: Creation as Science
Message #:
66
A reply to Archaeologist that stands out in two ways:
1 - It contains relevant quality information presented in a clear and concise fashion (of course, he's mostly quoting one of his earlier messages - Maybe that message got (or should have gotten) a POTM nomination).
2 - It is not like the too many replies to Archaeologist (in that topic and elsewhere) that do not have the qualities stated in (1).
Or something like that.
Bluescat48 also replied to the same message with a brief comment - OK I guess, but definitely not a POTM.
Hotjer also did a longer and rather convoluted reply which may or may not make important points (it's probably way better than any reply I could do, but that's not saying much).
Dr Adequate made a reply to a later Archaeologist message that
came close to getting him another suspension.
Minnemooseus (with additional Adminnemooseus comment)
Do NOT reply to the Adminnemooseus content (pretty much everything after point 1), in this topic.