|
Understanding through Discussion |
|
|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
| EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
|
| |
| The Rutificador chile | |
| Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 8/9 Hour: 0/0 |
| Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
| Author | Topic: 14C Calibration and Correlations | ||||||||||||||
|
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4446 days)  Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
then factoring in the truth that everything before Noah's flood wa sdestroyed, we do not know what records were kept or lost thus speculation sets in. oh, people may claim that there is no evidence for the flood but they cannot disprove it either. absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The point is you are making the claim there was a flood, therefore it is up to you to show the evidence. The claimant has to show evidence not the denier. The denier can't show evidence since there is none.What the denier does is show whether any evidence is reliable or not ie: falsification. I can't attempt to falsify evidence that does not exist.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024
