Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   how exactly does Israel stabilize the Middle East and why do we need Israel?
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 16 of 108 (572066)
08-03-2010 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by dronestar
08-03-2010 11:45 AM


Re: Iraqi lesson learned
Amerika's and Israel's actions are leading the world to more terrorism and catastrophic risks.
I can't disagree there. But nuclear weapons in Israel do pose a menacing threat and would raise a question of whether to fuck with Israel because of it.
I didn't say it wasn't a false or illusional stability, but that's what their after, really...
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by dronestar, posted 08-03-2010 11:45 AM dronestar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 17 of 108 (572069)
08-03-2010 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by onifre
08-03-2010 1:41 PM


onifre writes:
Men with big guns own it. That property, plus Iraq and Afghanistan make for a great military strong hold, or at least presence, in the Middle E.
Still not sure how that adds stability.
onifre writes:
IMO, because it is recognized as a nation versus just an offshore ballistic sub, which is also in that area too.
Are you saying the the purpose of Israel is to act as a tripwire for US actions?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by onifre, posted 08-03-2010 1:41 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by onifre, posted 08-03-2010 4:40 PM jar has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 18 of 108 (572083)
08-03-2010 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by jar
08-03-2010 1:50 PM


Still not sure how that adds stability.
If you mean stability for the people of the Middle East, no. But I wasn't refering to that type of stability.
I meant stability in the eyes of the US. Israel, and our influence military/weapon armament, provides us with a sense of stability for that area. Worse for us would be not having any strong hold in there at all. We would consider that un-stable territory.
Are you saying the the purpose of Israel is to act as a tripwire for US actions?
In the same way as Blackwater helps us. We can shift blame to someone else who isn't held to the same standards and isn't as influencial as the US. If Blackwater opens fire on suspected terrorist and injures civilians it's not as bad (for PR purposes) as if our troops do it.
Likewise Israel can and has done the same for us as Blackwater.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 1:50 PM jar has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 19 of 108 (572094)
08-03-2010 6:11 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Huntard
08-03-2010 12:04 PM


Re: replay?
Both are in the wrong here, maybe one is more wrong than the other, but it takes two to tango.
But in this case, it would be the same as saying black people tango'd with police during the civil rights movement. It took two to tango in their case too, but you can see how one side didn't really want to dance.
Israel (and the parties that aided) occupied land that they had no rights to. That is a very strong case for resisting on the part of the Palestinians don't you think? So everything that has occured since that day (occupation) is in regards to the initial invasion/occupation by force.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Huntard, posted 08-03-2010 12:04 PM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Huntard, posted 08-04-2010 2:49 AM onifre has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 20 of 108 (572095)
08-03-2010 6:17 PM


Topic please.
Please folk. This thread was meant to give Buz and others a chance to explain how exactly Israel stabilizes the Middle East and why we need Israel?
Edited by jar, : missed two words, added "a chance"

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by onifre, posted 08-03-2010 6:28 PM jar has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 21 of 108 (572097)
08-03-2010 6:28 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by jar
08-03-2010 6:17 PM


Re: Topic please.
This thread was meant to give Buz and others a chance to explain how exactly Israel stabilizes the Middle East and why we need Israel?
Just to clear any misunderstandings, do you mean how it stabilizes the Middle East in the eyes of Middle Easterners or in the eyes of the US?
Because I am totally opposed to Israel as a country and to their occupation, however, as a former military guy I can see how having that much armament in Israel stabilizes the Middle East in our PoV.
I won't post further till we hear from Buz and the others that you'd like to participate.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 6:17 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 6:31 PM onifre has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10045
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 22 of 108 (572100)
08-03-2010 6:31 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
08-03-2010 9:31 AM


The only thing that Israel seems to stabilize is the ire of the surrounding Muslim nations. The whole situation reminds me of the work that has been done on the leaning tower of Pisa. No matter what they do, be it adding counter weights or strengthening the masonry, it does nothing to fix the obvious. The damn tower is still leaning.
Why do we need Israel? It didn't start out as a need, but more of a promise. The formation of Israel was seen as a reparation for the Holocaust in many ways. The thought was nice, but the ensuing implementation was short sighted. In many ways America needs a strong Israel to save face, and American support for Israel is a hot-button election topic. If you are seen as weak on Israel you lose votes. I am starting to view the whole thing as a beast of its own making.
It is claimed that Israel is a strong ally in the region, but does America really need an ally? Even more, Turkey would be a much better ally and I really think they would be willing to act as our emissary to the area. If the area is ever going to stabilize it needs a muslim face on it, not a Jewish face with christian weapons to back it up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 9:31 AM jar has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Phat, posted 08-03-2010 7:57 PM Taq has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 23 of 108 (572101)
08-03-2010 6:31 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by onifre
08-03-2010 6:28 PM


Re: Topic please.
All great points and it will be interesting to see what they say.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by onifre, posted 08-03-2010 6:28 PM onifre has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 24 of 108 (572106)
08-03-2010 7:02 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
08-03-2010 9:31 AM


how exactly does Israel stabilize the Middle East
It does keep the middle east in a steady state of hostilities.
I guess that's consistent with one meaning of "stabilize".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 9:31 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Phat, posted 08-04-2010 2:10 PM nwr has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18310
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 25 of 108 (572115)
08-03-2010 7:57 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Taq
08-03-2010 6:31 PM


Is it about religion, anyway?
Taq writes:
The only thing that Israel seems to stabilize is the ire of the surrounding Muslim nations. The whole situation reminds me of the work that has been done on the leaning tower of Pisa. No matter what they do, be it adding counter weights or strengthening the masonry, it does nothing to fix the obvious. The damn tower is still leaning.
Why do we need Israel? It didn't start out as a need, but more of a promise. The formation of Israel was seen as a reparation for the Holocaust in many ways. The thought was nice, but the ensuing implementation was short sighted. In many ways America needs a strong Israel to save face, and American support for Israel is a hot-button election topic. If you are seen as weak on Israel you lose votes. I am starting to view the whole thing as a beast of its own making.
It is claimed that Israel is a strong ally in the region, but does America really need an ally? Even more, Turkey would be a much better ally and I really think they would be willing to act as our emissary to the area. If the area is ever going to stabilize it needs a muslim face on it, not a Jewish face with christian weapons to back it up.
I think that a secular humanist solution may be better than allowing any one religion to predominate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Taq, posted 08-03-2010 6:31 PM Taq has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 8:02 PM Phat has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 26 of 108 (572116)
08-03-2010 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Phat
08-03-2010 7:57 PM


Re: Is it about religion, anyway?
What does that have to do with the topic?
How exactly does Israel stabilize the Middle East and why do we need Israel?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Phat, posted 08-03-2010 7:57 PM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Coyote, posted 08-03-2010 8:25 PM jar has replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2128 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 27 of 108 (572118)
08-03-2010 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by jar
08-03-2010 8:02 PM


Science
Take a look at the relative accomplishments in science among the Middle Eastern countries.
Israel is in the 21st century and at the forefront of scientific knowledge, while many of the surrounding countries are trying their best to revert back to the Middle Ages. Many of those countries turned their backs on an era of major scientific accomplishment some 600-700 years ago, and embraced fundamentalism instead.
Poverty and religious fundamentalism together are certainly destabilizing.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 8:02 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 8:30 PM Coyote has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 28 of 108 (572120)
08-03-2010 8:30 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Coyote
08-03-2010 8:25 PM


Re: Science
But how does Israel stabilize the region? Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon all support science and education. So does Iran. What makes you think they turned their back on scientific knowledge?
Much of the poverty in the Middle East is by design and controlled by Israel. After all it is Israel that limits the power, water, jobs, materials, investments in much of Palestine.
If poverty and fundamentalism are a problem, how does the existence of Israel moderate either factor?
Edited by jar, : hit wrong key

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Coyote, posted 08-03-2010 8:25 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Coyote, posted 08-03-2010 11:03 PM jar has replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2128 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 29 of 108 (572127)
08-03-2010 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by jar
08-03-2010 8:30 PM


Re: Science
An example from today's news:
Routine Blood Tests Could Replace Colonoscopy (IsraelNationalNews.com)

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by jar, posted 08-03-2010 8:30 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by jar, posted 08-04-2010 8:19 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 30 of 108 (572139)
08-04-2010 2:49 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by onifre
08-03-2010 6:11 PM


Re: replay?
onifre writes:
But in this case, it would be the same as saying black people tango'd with police during the civil rights movement. It took two to tango in their case too, but you can see how one side didn't really want to dance.
If not wanting to dance is blowing up busses with civilians, then I don;t know what is.
Israel (and the parties that aided) occupied land that they had no rights to.
True.
That is a very strong case for resisting on the part of the Palestinians don't you think?
Perhaps, but there are many ways of resistance.
So everything that has occured since that day (occupation) is in regards to the initial invasion/occupation by force.
I still say blowing up busses with civilians in them isn't a productive way of reaching an understanding.
{ABE}: I will shut up now, as this has nothing to do with the topic.
Edited by Huntard, : Added {ABE} bit

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by onifre, posted 08-03-2010 6:11 PM onifre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024