|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: How to Americanize Soccer? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9973 Joined: Member Rating: 5.7 |
Since we (Yanks) are accused of modifying other sports and calling them our own (e.g. american football, baseball) I say that we do the same with soccer. Here are three rule changes that would make the sport more palletable to the average Yank:
1. Change offsides to an offside line like it is in ice hockey. No offensive player can enter the offensive zone until the ball has crossed the line. After that, offensive players can be anywhere within the offensive zone regardless of where the ball or defensive players are. 2. Stealing from hockey once again, if someone is actively playing the ball you can hit them with your body. No elbows or blows with the feet, but a good body check is legal. 3. No throw in. Free kicks from the side line. Anyone else?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2477 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
Divide the game into quarters instead of halves, shorten the actual playing time by about half, and permit the coaches (no longer called "managers") to call a few 5 minute timeouts.
That means T.V. companies have plenty of space for commercial breaks, so you can be sold lots of consumer goods, and the actual soccer has been properly fitted around the much more American pastime of rampant consumerism. Bring in cheerleaders doing cartwheels too, so the men in the live audiences have something to watch during the commercials.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3
|
How to Americanize soccer:
Sorry, couldn't resist. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 284 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
. Change offsides to an offside line like it is in ice hockey. No offensive player can enter the offensive zone until the ball has crossed the line. After that, offensive players can be anywhere within the offensive zone regardless of where the ball or defensive players are. That might be worth trying. But I'm going to guess that it wouldn't work.
2. Stealing from hockey once again, if someone is actively playing the ball you can hit them with your body. No elbows or blows with the feet, but a good body check is legal. No. It would deprive the game of much of the individual skill that makes it so enjoyable to watch. If you did that then how could someone be a genius with the ball at his feet? He could just be body-checked, and that would be the end of it.
3. No throw in. Free kicks from the side line. Why? I mean, I can't see an argument against that, but how would it improve the game?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6408 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
quote:Australian business – Evolving Thoughts |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.7 |
I think you've misunderstood; we're trying to Americanize the game, not make it better...
* Have teams of about 33 with the ability to swap people on and off at will, and time outs to do so. Entirely swap the team over between attach and defence. * Replace yellow/red cards with some kind of sin bin arrangement. * Get rid of the goalie; he just stop points being score anyway.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jumped Up Chimpanzee Member (Idle past 4942 days) Posts: 572 From: UK Joined: |
2. Stealing from hockey once again, if someone is actively playing the ball you can hit them with your body. No elbows or blows with the feet, but a good body check is legal. This is already allowed to some extent in the laws of the game in the form of a shoulder charge. If 2 players are chasing the ball side-by-side, they do have some leeway in using their shoulders against each other to get to the ball. Under the laws of the game, a charge is not allowed if it is careless, reckless or uses excessive force. However, it's all a question of the referee's interpretation. In the British leagues you can still get away with a more robust challenge than is permitted in most other countries and international competitions, including the World Cup. In the old days you could get away with a full on body charge, even against the goalkeeper. There is a famous film of a cup final in England from the 1920's or 30's where the goalkeeper caught the ball on the line and the forward charged straight into him and bundled him into the back of the net. Nobody questioned that it was a perfectly fair goal. In another final the goalkeeper broke his neck, but carried on playing til the end of the match. Those were the days!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 164 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
First thing would be to reduce the skill set to running, catching and body checking any one with the ball (and make sure players only need one of these skills).
Oh, wait. That's American football....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9973 Joined: Member Rating: 5.7 |
No. [Body checks] would deprive the game of much of the individual skill that makes it so enjoyable to watch. If you did that then how could someone be a genius with the ball at his feet? He could just be body-checked, and that would be the end of it. If I wanted to watch two prissy guys dance around with each other I would go to the ballet.
Why [have free kick instead of throw in]? I mean, I can't see an argument against that, but how would it improve the game? A free kick puts the ball into a scoring position faster than a throw in. Wouldn't you agree that a corner kick is more entertaining than a throw in?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9973 Joined: Member Rating: 5.7 |
I think you've misunderstood; we're trying to Americanize the game, not make it better... See? Someone understands what I am saying.
Have teams of about 33 with the ability to swap people on and off at will, and time outs to do so. Entirely swap the team over between attach and defence. That's how recreational leagues work in my part of the world. Unlimited substitutions during a stoppage in play.
Replace yellow/red cards with some kind of sin bin arrangement. Like that as well. Works well in rugby.
Get rid of the goalie; he just stop points being score anyway. Actually, I would go in the opposite direction if scoring went up. Make the goal smaller. This would make for better goalie play and more spectacular saves. The perfect "American" final score would be about 3 to 4 goals a side on average.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyroglyphx Inactive Member |
Here are three rule changes that would make the sport more palletable to the average Yank I don't particularly think the United States needs to be accommodated. But it is a curious thing why (and I indict myself in this charge) we love soccer during the World Cup, but don't pay much, if any, attention to it any other time. There are a lot of diehard fans, particularly in Seattle (for some odd reason), but it doesn't get the attention that baseball, football, or basketball receives. I still don't know why that is. Rugby too... Because we like rough and tumble sports. And rugby is violent as all hell. I'm genuinely mystified why rugby and soccer don't have a larger fanbase.
1. Change offsides to an offside line like it is in ice hockey. I really can't understand why there already isn't a line of demarcation painted on the field. Why hasn't this been amended by now??? There's obviously more room for referee error without it, such as the Yanks have seen in this World Cup against the Slovenians.
2. Stealing from hockey once again, if someone is actively playing the ball you can hit them with your body. No elbows or blows with the feet, but a good body check is legal. I don't think that's a good idea. Scoring is tough enough already (something Americans are not accustomed to. They like a lot of action). Adding shoulder checks in to the mix would severely diminish the amount goals, I would think. Besides, America has enough blood sports (MMA, boxing, football, hockey, lacrosse)
3. No throw in. Free kicks from the side line. I like throw in's, much easier to control the direction of the ball. However, I think it would be cool to opt to kick the ball for more range, since obviously one could kick farther than they can throw. "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from mistaken conviction." — Blaise Pascal
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyroglyphx Inactive Member |
How to Americanize soccer 1-6 Gosh, your recommendations sound so familiar... Where have I seen this before? "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from mistaken conviction." — Blaise Pascal
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyroglyphx Inactive Member |
Sounds brilliant!!!
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from mistaken conviction." — Blaise Pascal
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2106 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Helmets and shoulder pads should be a good start.
And that "no hands" nonsense has got to go!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9973 Joined: Member Rating: 5.7 |
Helmets and shoulder pads should be a good start. And that "no hands" nonsense has got to go! We already Americanized rugby. Keep the no hands policy in.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024