|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Opening the doors to creationism in British Schools? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3985 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Its very simple to answer, and sorry to bust your bubble. I would nominate the lack of any scientific peer paper based on any scientific research which can offer any alternative. The flat earth was not abandoned because Galeleo said so - it had tio be proven as false. This obligation remains on the scientific community to dispell Creationism. When this happens I will have no credibility in opposing it - and I surely will not. My pursuit is truth wherever it comes from. I studied all the state of art sciences, pondered them deeply, and concluded: THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC ALTERNATIVE TO CREATIONISM. Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3985 days) Posts: 2822 Joined:
|
For those same reasons, our free choice is limited and conditional to moral/ethical decisions only; outside of these we have no free choice. Yes we can intentionally choose not to breathe - but for how long? And choosing between a green or yellow rolls royce is not the kind of free choice which is referred to here; rather the ones which impact in the big picture are referred to. This is the reason free choice and free speech are subject to the law, that they do not violate other laws.
Moral/ethical/Judiciary laws work exactly as do the laws of gravity and math, and stem from the same source: a disfunction will ultimately pop up and expose the error.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 171 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
When you say that you have studied, exactly what level of study did you formally reach: degree, masters or doctorate?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 4030 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
We can intentionally choose to not wear clothing. Yes we can intentionally choose not to breathe - but for how long?For how long? For our whole long lives. We do not need clothing.Your statement is false. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
frako Member Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: |
The flat earth was not abandoned because Galeleo said so - it had tio be proven as false. This obligation remains on the scientific community to dispell Creationism. Well it is the obligation of the creationist community to prove that Chronos did not create the universe by making a dagger out of his rib and cutting into the darkness. Until then the chronos theory should be taught in schools. The same goes for pink gravity faries , the pink unicorn, mumbo the guy who had an upset stomach and vomited the universe into exsistance .... Edited by frako, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3985 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
They become silly when they loose - just like any red blooded theologist. These are losers:
quote: But only humans are seen with this need and doing so - false - or is your aruement becoming silly?
quote: Of course we have a chrono who first introduced creationism - with an iltelligent chronology listing which none can overturn today - or is someone's brain upset?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3985 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
I've obviously studied more than you because I don't swallow 'EVERYTHING' and report it as if it was both a scientific fact and evidential in everything around me. Yes I hold a B in Architecture. You?
Chess champs make poor war generals. Many scientists are dumber than dumb in most things today - they tow the line for fear of a bad career move and grants conditions, a corruption which has been invading good science for decades. Poke a hole in Darwin and you get bumped forever.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 4030 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
No, humans are not seen with a need for clothes. But only humans are seen with this need I have asked several times and you seem unable to answer it, so I will repeat it:I have lived in Iceland without clothes. Why am I still alive? Or did I not need clothes?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3985 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Pandas of iceland don't need clothes. Only humans do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granny Magda Member (Idle past 355 days) Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: |
Pandas of iceland don't need clothes. Plus, look at how your furry little panda ass is surrounded by all that fire. No wonder you were okay. You have to admit, he's got you there. Mutate and Survive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 4030 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
So, you finally agree with me. Pandas of iceland don't need clothes. Only humans do.Humans don't need clothing. Why didn't you just say sooner and save us all a lot of time. Or is there some other reason you refuse to answer such a simple question? Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 4030 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Granny Magda writes:
Us pesky pandas and our broadband connections and our computers... You have to admit, he's got you there. It is a shame the IamJoseph has to be such a moron when failing to support his arguments.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3987 Joined: |
message 1 writes: Apparantly the new British government is planning to give parents, teachers and charities powers to open their own schools and (as far as I can tell) set their own curriculum. Is this not just a way of giving religious groups via charitable status a means of setting up religious schools and teaching creationism/IB and other such dubious beliefs under whatever title they want, mainly science? (BBC News - Tory free schools 'barking mad' says teachers' leader) Even where those intending to open schools have no such ambitions I have little faith in the ability of parents, charities and even some teachers to give children a comprehensive education without a governing body inplace to ensure that basic minumum standards are met. Personally I'm not suprised that this is being proposed by the Conservative and that the Lib Dems (Who I supported partly because there more secular stance on education) aren't particually happy with this. This will not address the real problem which is poor parenting resulting in children with behavioural problems and little ambitionswhen it comes to educating and ultimately bettering themselves. All messages should have some obvious connection to the merit or lack of merit, and methodolgy of inserting creationism into British schools. Adminnemooseus Please be familiar with the various topics and other links in the "Essential Links", found in the top of the page menu. Amongst other things, this is where to find where to report various forum problems.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 171 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Yes I hold a B in Architecture. You? What is a B? B tech, BA? I'm confused. And Architecture is hardly a science. Myself? MSc in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. My point remains that you appear to know fuck all about the scientific methodology.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3985 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025