Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Opening the doors to creationism in British Schools?
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3668 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 107 of 129 (625386)
07-22-2011 10:49 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by Panda
07-20-2011 9:32 AM


For those same reasons, our free choice is limited and conditional to moral/ethical decisions only; outside of these we have no free choice. Yes we can intentionally choose not to breathe - but for how long? And choosing between a green or yellow rolls royce is not the kind of free choice which is referred to here; rather the ones which impact in the big picture are referred to. This is the reason free choice and free speech are subject to the law, that they do not violate other laws.
Moral/ethical/Judiciary laws work exactly as do the laws of gravity and math, and stem from the same source: a disfunction will ultimately pop up and expose the error.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Panda, posted 07-20-2011 9:32 AM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Panda, posted 07-23-2011 7:52 AM IamJoseph has not replied

IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3668 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 111 of 129 (625533)
07-23-2011 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by frako
07-23-2011 8:15 AM


They become silly when they loose - just like any red blooded theologist. These are losers:
quote:
We can intentionally choose to not wear clothing.
For how long? For our whole long lives.
We do not need clothing.
Your statement is false.
But only humans are seen with this need and doing so - false - or is your aruement becoming silly?
quote:
The flat earth was not abandoned because Galeleo said so - it had tio be proven as false. This obligation remains on the scientific community to dispell Creationism.
Well it is the obligation of the creationist community to prove that Chronos did not create the universe by making a dagger out of his rib and cutting into the darkness. Until then the chronos theory should be taught in schools.
The same goes for pink gravity faries , the pink unicorn, mumbo the guy who had an upset stomach and vomited the universe into exsistance ....
Of course we have a chrono who first introduced creationism - with an iltelligent chronology listing which none can overturn today - or is someone's brain upset?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by frako, posted 07-23-2011 8:15 AM frako has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Panda, posted 07-23-2011 10:07 PM IamJoseph has replied

IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3668 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 112 of 129 (625534)
07-23-2011 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Larni
07-23-2011 5:03 AM


I've obviously studied more than you because I don't swallow 'EVERYTHING' and report it as if it was both a scientific fact and evidential in everything around me. Yes I hold a B in Architecture. You?
Chess champs make poor war generals. Many scientists are dumber than dumb in most things today - they tow the line for fear of a bad career move and grants conditions, a corruption which has been invading good science for decades. Poke a hole in Darwin and you get bumped forever.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Larni, posted 07-23-2011 5:03 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Larni, posted 07-24-2011 6:33 AM IamJoseph has replied

IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3668 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 114 of 129 (625550)
07-23-2011 10:38 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Panda
07-23-2011 10:07 PM


Pandas of iceland don't need clothes. Only humans do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Panda, posted 07-23-2011 10:07 PM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by Panda, posted 07-23-2011 11:45 PM IamJoseph has not replied

IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3668 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 120 of 129 (625587)
07-24-2011 7:29 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by Larni
07-24-2011 6:33 AM



This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Larni, posted 07-24-2011 6:33 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Larni, posted 07-24-2011 8:25 AM IamJoseph has not replied

IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3668 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 123 of 129 (625595)
07-24-2011 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by bluegenes
07-24-2011 8:55 AM


Re: World of his own.
quote:
I'm sorry but I don't see how that website answers my question.
And as an architect I was dead on by guessing you either did a humanity or engineering.
Still no idea was a 'B' in architecture is.
Is it really confusing to you guys? A simple metaphor, as an expressionism as to why we have no idea of our origins? Its like a numeriology, only here it is fixed in an escapabale mode. When we look at the structure of this second alphabet, we find it open only on the < GO FORTH facet [look at it!], and it is followed by a command to GO FORTH AND HAVE DOMINION OF ALL THE WORLDS. Science becomes bigger with a good expression.
That command is also the only answer to today's climate problem. Like how about a dome city on the moon in a 100 years and five bases on Mars - put all that money and energy here instead? Its not even an optional thing. Answers can also be seen in clever expressionisms. Like God does not play dice; why did the apple fall down and not up; Let there be light; etc?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by bluegenes, posted 07-24-2011 8:55 AM bluegenes has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by Larni, posted 07-24-2011 11:17 AM IamJoseph has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024