Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Truth About Evolution and Religion
dkroemer
Member (Idle past 5054 days)
Posts: 125
From: Brooklyn, New York
Joined: 05-15-2010


Message 1 of 419 (560526)
05-15-2010 7:20 PM


Edited by AdminSlev, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminSlev, posted 05-16-2010 12:04 AM dkroemer has replied

  
AdminSlev
Member (Idle past 4640 days)
Posts: 113
Joined: 03-28-2010


Message 2 of 419 (560555)
05-16-2010 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by dkroemer
05-15-2010 7:20 PM


Hi dkroemer,
This type of self promotion is considered as spam here. This is why I have hidden it.
You seem to be interested in discussing the evolution/creation issue. I would propose that you could write an opening post about maybe your most complete argument/point of view, and I could then promote it for discussion.

- EvC Administrator -
Understanding through Knowledge and Discussion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by dkroemer, posted 05-15-2010 7:20 PM dkroemer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by dkroemer, posted 05-16-2010 2:31 AM AdminSlev has not replied

  
dkroemer
Member (Idle past 5054 days)
Posts: 125
From: Brooklyn, New York
Joined: 05-15-2010


Message 3 of 419 (560568)
05-16-2010 2:31 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminSlev
05-16-2010 12:04 AM


The Truth About Evolution and Religion
Evolutionary biology concerns only the evolution of the human body, not the soul. Also, natural selection only explains the adaptation of organisms to its environment, not common descent.
It is true that biology textbooks don't mention the human soul. However, science textbooks also don't mention free will and the conscious knowledge of human beings. It is understood that human rationality, the soul, God, and intelligent design are not scientific concepts and don't belong in a biology textbook.
While many writers, even science writers, think natural selection explains the increase in the complexity of life as it evolved from single-celled organisms to chimps, no professional biologist says such a thing. In my opinion, the so-called debate or "controversy" about evolution is pseudo-science and prevents people from believing in the Bible and the Koran.

David Roemer

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminSlev, posted 05-16-2010 12:04 AM AdminSlev has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by RAZD, posted 05-16-2010 6:54 PM dkroemer has not replied
 Message 6 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-16-2010 9:17 PM dkroemer has not replied
 Message 7 by Coyote, posted 05-16-2010 9:42 PM dkroemer has replied
 Message 45 by Blue Jay, posted 05-17-2010 2:56 PM dkroemer has replied
 Message 409 by barbara, posted 07-19-2010 1:37 AM dkroemer has not replied
 Message 416 by barbara, posted 07-23-2010 2:42 PM dkroemer has not replied

  
AdminSlev
Member (Idle past 4640 days)
Posts: 113
Joined: 03-28-2010


Message 4 of 419 (560641)
05-16-2010 6:04 PM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the The Truth About Evolution and Religion thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 5 of 419 (560650)
05-16-2010 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by dkroemer
05-16-2010 2:31 AM


Time to learn what evolution is about?
Hi dkroemer, and welcome to the fray.
I understand you are inordinately proud of your youtube video.
Unfortunately you are also sadly wrong about the basics of evolution, and this leads you to make some false conclusions.
Evolutionary biology concerns only the evolution of the human body, not the soul.
Evolutionary biology is concerned with the evolution of life as we know it, from the world around us, from history, and from prehistory; from archaeology, paleontology, geology, physics and even astronomy; it is based on evidence and seeing how it all fits together. Human beings are only one incidental element of biology in general and evolution in particular.
Curiously, you are correct that evolution in particular and biology in general (if not science as a whole) is not concerned with the evolution of non-physical non-material elements that are undefined and that have no evidence of existence. Science only deals with what can be measured and described and tested.
Also, natural selection only explains the adaptation of organisms to its environment, not common descent.
Nor does natural selection really explain adaptation of organisms to environment, strictly speaking. It only explains the increased survival and breeding of the organisms that are already best adapted to their ecology among those in the population under selection. Adaptation comes about through the dual mechanisms of mutation and selection: mutations offer new variations, which may or may not be better adapted to a specific ecology, and natural selection then gives "preferential treatment" to those who are better adapted to their ecology among those in the population under selection by allowing them to survive and breed better than the other organisms in the breeding population.
It is true that biology textbooks don't mention the human soul. However, science textbooks also don't mention free will and the conscious knowledge of human beings. It is understood that human rationality, the soul, God, and intelligent design are not scientific concepts and don't belong in a biology textbook.
Correct, because biology textbooks in specific are not religious or philosophical texts, and science in general is not religion or philosophy. Rather science is a method of testing concepts against evidence of reality, and it involves discarding invalidated concepts.
While many writers, even science writers, think natural selection explains the increase in the complexity of life as it evolved from single-celled organisms to chimps, ...
As noted above, natural selection alone is insufficient to explain even "the increase in the complexity of life as it evolved from single-celled organisms to chimps" because this is just one part of the evolutionary picture. To explain "the increase in the complexity of life as it evolved from single-celled organisms to chimps" you need to use all of evolution, which include many other concepts, mutation, neutral drift, among others.
... no professional biologist says such a thing.
Because "professional biologists" (ie people with degrees in biology and who have studied what evolution is really about) know that there is more to evolution than just natural selection.
In my opinion, ...
Curiously, your opinion is totally irrelevant to the truth. Opinion and belief have been found to be completely incapable of altering reality in any way. Reality always seems to have the last word. This is why invalidated concepts are discarded in science: science is a process that approximates the truth, refining and moving closer to reality as new concepts are tried out and tested.
Amusingly evolution is one of the best tested concepts in science. You can see evolution occurring all around you.
... the so-called debate or "controversy" about evolution is pseudo-science and prevents people from believing in the Bible and the Koran.
Amazingly there are many christians and muslims that have no problem at all with their beliefs and with evolution. Incredibly there are many other religions that don't even have fundamentalist sects that disagree with evolution and that do not find that evolution "prevents" them from believing what they believe. Logically then the fault\cause of any conflict between a specific religion and evolution must lie with the religion.
For example, it is readily apparent that any religion at odds with reality (ie advocating a young earth when the evidence is that the earth is old) will find themselves at odds with the science that details the evidence of reality, and yet it is not the fault of the science for detailing what the evidence shows.
Enjoy
... as you are new here, some posting tips:
type [qs]quotes are easy[/qs] and it becomes:
quotes are easy
or type [quote]quotes are easy[/quote] and it becomes:
quote:
quotes are easy
also check out (help) links on any formatting questions when in the reply window.
For other formatting tips see Posting Tips
If you use the message reply buttons (there's one at the bottom right of each message):

... your message is linked to the one you are replying to (adds clarity). You can also look at the way a post is formatted with the "peek" button next to it.
Edited by RAZD, : clarity
Edited by RAZD, : more

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by dkroemer, posted 05-16-2010 2:31 AM dkroemer has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 6 of 419 (560660)
05-16-2010 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by dkroemer
05-16-2010 2:31 AM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
It is true that biology textbooks don't mention the human soul.
It's too ill-defined to mention.
However, science textbooks also don't mention free will and the conscious knowledge of human beings.
Psychology is in fact a science.
While many writers, even science writers, think natural selection explains the increase in the complexity of life as it evolved from single-celled organisms to chimps, no professional biologist says such a thing.
This is technically true --- the theory of evolution explains that. Anyone who says that "natural selection" explains that is using "natural selection" as a sort of shorthand for "the theory of evolution". (Or possibly they're actually mistaken.)
In my opinion, the so-called debate or "controversy" about evolution is pseudo-science and prevents people from believing in the Bible and the Koran.
Or from believing in biology. That's the trouble with fundies, they want to make it into a choice between the two.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by dkroemer, posted 05-16-2010 2:31 AM dkroemer has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2106 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 7 of 419 (560662)
05-16-2010 9:42 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by dkroemer
05-16-2010 2:31 AM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
In my opinion, the so-called debate or "controversy" about evolution is pseudo-science and prevents people from believing in the Bible and the Koran.
The so-called "debate or 'controversy' about evolution" is indeed pseudo-science.
It is brought to us by creation "scientists" who are religious apologists, but not scientists.
Within science there is no such controversy. Science relies on empirical evidence, not religious belief. Science relies on that which can be observed and replicated, not the dogma, scripture, and "divine" revelation that stands behind creation "science."
The controversy you speak of is entirely drummed up by religious apologists to counter the unfortunate fact (for them) that their religious beliefs are not supported by empirical evidence.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by dkroemer, posted 05-16-2010 2:31 AM dkroemer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by dkroemer, posted 05-16-2010 10:55 PM Coyote has replied

  
dkroemer
Member (Idle past 5054 days)
Posts: 125
From: Brooklyn, New York
Joined: 05-15-2010


Message 8 of 419 (560677)
05-16-2010 10:55 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Coyote
05-16-2010 9:42 PM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
The human soul is not a poorly defined concept at all. What can't be defined is free will and the conscious knowledge of human beings. This is why humans are indefinabilities that become conscious of their own existence or embodied spirits. The human soul is a metaphysical principle that makes humans equal to one another and the body is a correlative principle that makes humans different from one another. The following is a quote from Stephen Jay Gould admitting that evolution only applies to the bodies of humans, not their souls:
Catholics could believe whatever science determined about the evolution of the human body, so long as they accepted that, at some time of his choosing, God had infused the soul into such a creature. I also knew that I had no problem with this statement, for whatever my private beliefs about souls, science cannot touch such a subject and therefore cannot be threatened by any theological position on such a legitimately and intrinsically religious issue. (Stephen Jay Gould, Nonoverlapping Magisteria, Natural History, March 1997, 13th paragraph)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Coyote, posted 05-16-2010 9:42 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Coyote, posted 05-16-2010 10:57 PM dkroemer has replied
 Message 10 by Huntard, posted 05-17-2010 5:40 AM dkroemer has replied
 Message 12 by RAZD, posted 05-17-2010 7:26 AM dkroemer has not replied
 Message 35 by Hyroglyphx, posted 05-17-2010 10:25 AM dkroemer has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2106 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 9 of 419 (560678)
05-16-2010 10:57 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by dkroemer
05-16-2010 10:55 PM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
Your response did not deal at all with what I posted.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by dkroemer, posted 05-16-2010 10:55 PM dkroemer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by dkroemer, posted 05-17-2010 7:21 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 10 of 419 (560705)
05-17-2010 5:40 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by dkroemer
05-16-2010 10:55 PM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
dkroemer writes:
The human soul is not a poorly defined concept at all.
Care to give the definition then?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by dkroemer, posted 05-16-2010 10:55 PM dkroemer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by dkroemer, posted 05-17-2010 7:28 AM Huntard has replied

  
dkroemer
Member (Idle past 5054 days)
Posts: 125
From: Brooklyn, New York
Joined: 05-15-2010


Message 11 of 419 (560711)
05-17-2010 7:21 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Coyote
05-16-2010 10:57 PM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
Science is only one method of inquiry and is based on sense knowledge. Metaphysics is based on logic and knowledge gained from our transcendence (e.g., humans are responsible for their actions). In both science and metaphysics you can see the truth of what you know. In revealed religion, you can't see the truth of it. You know it is true because God is telling you (e.g., there is life after death).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Coyote, posted 05-16-2010 10:57 PM Coyote has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 12 of 419 (560712)
05-17-2010 7:26 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by dkroemer
05-16-2010 10:55 PM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
Hi again, dkroemer,
The following is a quote from Stephen Jay Gould admitting that evolution only applies to the bodies of humans, not their souls:
The argument from authority doesn't mean that what is said is true, you need evidence.
The human soul is not a poorly defined concept at all.
So (1) bygosh lets have this definition, and then see if you have any evidence for it, and (2) how does this apply to other religions.
Just because you say "religion" doesn't mean you only consider one of them (and only one of them).
Now, do you want to learn about evolution?
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by dkroemer, posted 05-16-2010 10:55 PM dkroemer has not replied

  
dkroemer
Member (Idle past 5054 days)
Posts: 125
From: Brooklyn, New York
Joined: 05-15-2010


Message 13 of 419 (560713)
05-17-2010 7:28 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Huntard
05-17-2010 5:40 AM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
Metaphysics is the study of being as being (being in the abstract). Metaphysics doesn't address all questions (What is knowledge? What is free will?). It explains why beings change, why beings are finite, and why beings are members of a class or category of being.
When a being changes in time, there is a contradiction. It is the same and is yet different. How can this be made intelligible? Ans.: A being is a metaphysical composition of substance and accidence. Likewise, a finite being is composed of essence and existence. A being that is a member of a class is composed of form and matter. For humans, the form is called the soul and the matter is called the body.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Huntard, posted 05-17-2010 5:40 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by RAZD, posted 05-17-2010 7:44 AM dkroemer has replied
 Message 15 by Huntard, posted 05-17-2010 8:03 AM dkroemer has replied
 Message 32 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-17-2010 10:09 AM dkroemer has not replied
 Message 46 by ICANT, posted 05-17-2010 3:10 PM dkroemer has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1405 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 14 of 419 (560714)
05-17-2010 7:44 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by dkroemer
05-17-2010 7:28 AM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion preaching
Hi again dkroemer
Metaphysics is the ...
I thought you wanted to talk about evolution, and how it interfaces with religions, not just preach your specific religion.
My mistake. Have fun.
Enjoy.
Edited by RAZD, : subtitle

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by dkroemer, posted 05-17-2010 7:28 AM dkroemer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by dkroemer, posted 05-17-2010 8:36 AM RAZD has replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 15 of 419 (560716)
05-17-2010 8:03 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by dkroemer
05-17-2010 7:28 AM


Re: The Truth About Evolution and Religion
dkroemer writes:
Metaphysics is the study of being as being (being in the abstract). Metaphysics doesn't address all questions (What is knowledge? What is free will?). It explains why beings change, why beings are finite, and why beings are members of a class or category of being.
When a being changes in time, there is a contradiction. It is the same and is yet different. How can this be made intelligible? Ans.: A being is a metaphysical composition of substance and accidence. Likewise, a finite being is composed of essence and existence. A being that is a member of a class is composed of form and matter. For humans, the form is called the soul and the matter is called the body.
And your evidence for all these blind assertions is what exactly?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by dkroemer, posted 05-17-2010 7:28 AM dkroemer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by dkroemer, posted 05-17-2010 8:26 AM Huntard has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024