Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9219 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: KING IYK
Post Volume: Total: 920,770 Year: 1,092/6,935 Month: 373/719 Week: 15/146 Day: 15/23 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Silly Design Institute: Let's discuss BOTH sides of the Design Controversy...
jacortina
Member (Idle past 5409 days)
Posts: 64
Joined: 08-07-2009


Message 121 of 219 (530036)
10-11-2009 11:59 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by Buzsaw
10-11-2009 11:27 PM


Re: Creationist Side Of Silly Design
I don't think it's fair to classify intelligent design with astrology. That's as illogical as classifying a Model T Ford with a 2009 Cadilac.
Well, Astrology DOES have a lot more going for it than ID does.
After all, it can tell a LOT about HOW it has to occur: not effective before birth; directional from certain solar system bodies; influences from different bodies being qualitatively distinct from one another; such influences combinatorial in that influences from different celestial bodies amplify, modify, nullify one another depending on positions relative to each other and relative to the background star field; and more.
Maybe someday the Model T Ford of ID will catch up and figure out how/when/where design is supposed to have been applied.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Buzsaw, posted 10-11-2009 11:27 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025