...who can present both ...
Both? Do you have any idea how many creation myths there are? Or are you just presuming that
your favorite story will be the alternative selected?
Actually the title of the thread is poorly worded, as it doesn't make the context clear. Should kids be taught about religion? Sure. And physics, and grammar, and history too. If the thread were titled "Should we teach both evolution and English grammar in school?" would that make any sense? Of course not. Why? Because grammar and science are not alternatives to one another. When you say...
...describe them and let you chose what's more plausible for you.
...you are making a statement that is conceptually nonsensical unless you have previously determined that certain religious claims are actually scientific in nature.
So, should religion be taught? Sure, along with as many other things as possible. Should one brand of religion be injected into science class as if it were actually science? No. That would be lying.