|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Should we teach both evolution and religion in school? | |||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4190 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
the evidence is there, you just choose not to see it. Please show this evidence. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4190 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
i have already given some--go to the nurseries and see for yourself that life reproduces exactly as genesis said. we have museums filled with archaeological evidence supporting the biblical record. there is so much but if you only listen to those who tell you what you want to hear and are not serious about it then i could give you the ark (an example) and you would never believe me. I have listened to these Bronze age myths for 62 years and that is why I say you still have shown no evidence. 5000 year old stories show no evidence nor do looking a plants & animals. If genesis was true there would be one species of cat, dog, horse, maple, oak, jellyfish, squid, lobster etc. How many species were on your mythical Ark? But to get back on topic. It is simple. Science should be taught in science classes and religion in social classes. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4190 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
Well, that's the only museum that provides any "evidence" for any global flud. The only thing I can see from the Creo Museum is that the curators believe that myths are truths. What evidence is there in that museum that validates the floodd or any thing else the creos believe in? There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4190 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
not really as noah came before the hindus and their writings as did adam and others. Even if Noah & Adam existed, the writings of them were not compiled until the 10th century BCE. The Hindu civilization was already in flourish before Israel took control of Canaan. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4190 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
that is not micro-evolution at work but reproduction Reproduction is micro-evolution. When man A mates with Woman B and produces Child C, C gets half of its chromosomes from A and half from B therefore is different from either thus descent with modification which is called evolution. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4190 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
if the process of evolution were true, there would be no need for reproductive systems and the process would not know to carry on till it got reproductive organs, it would not know how to design them, and why make the women's vaginal canal so small so that she feels pain--are you going to tell a pregnant woman that she feels pain because she hasn't fully evolved?---good luck with that one. I can fully see your problem now. You think that we on the evolution side think that evolution has design and direction. That is the problem it doesn't. That is what natural selection is. the best genes procede the lessor do not. There is no direction and no goal involved. What's more many altering show a total lack of design.Check out EvC Forum: Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Part II for this. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024