|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 4964 days) Posts: 572 From: UK Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Marriage – What is it and what’s the point? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 185 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
You do know the Code was written be fore Gen, don't you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4039 Joined: Member Rating: 8.2 |
He thinks Genesis describes the beginning of time, so I rather doubt he knows any such thing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyroglyphx Inactive Member |
Marriage exists as a covenant before God and is a reflection of the Christ-Church relationship. Interesting. Makes me wonder though why marriage existed long before Christ if that were true and why people marry for entirely different reasons.
I do have to agree with you that outside of the sacred context, I see no overt reason for marriage itself in terms of purpose. I think maybe for purposes of rearing children. Either that or, as you said, designed to mirror a covenant between Christ and the Church. Edited by Hyroglyphx, : No reason given. "Political correctness is tyranny with manners." -- Charlton Heston
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DPowell Member (Idle past 4938 days) Posts: 48 Joined: |
Sorry, I haven't checked on this thing in a while, heh. I do know that the Code was penned before Genesis, but in terms of raw chronology (the actual events), the events of Genesis 2 would precede the Code of Hammurabi by over 2,000 years. Moses did not make up the contents of the book of Genesis but was rather compiling the oral history of much earlier times.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DPowell Member (Idle past 4938 days) Posts: 48 Joined: |
I may be some psycho-conservative-Christian wacko in your mind, but I try to be respectful to you guys. I have a degree in history to balance my second degree in divinity, so I am in fact familiar with the Code of Hammurabi. I will not personally slam any of you guys for your views; a little reciprocity would be nice. I think a good, honest discussion on this stuff is a great thing.
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning Edited by AdminPD, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 185 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Moses did not make up the contents of the book of Genesis but was rather compiling the oral history of much earlier times. You can't do that. The date of something that is actually written is a different to events that are purported to have taken place 2000 years before they are written down. Edited by AdminPD, : Warning Edited by AdminPD, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DPowell Member (Idle past 4938 days) Posts: 48 Joined: |
You are right in saying that, but it is irrelevant.
The point is this: Marriage goes back a minimum of 3,000 years before the Code of Hammurabi. Moses' penning of Genesis (whether you think he wrote it or not) did not institute marriage. It was in existence 3,500 years or so before this. Moses was merely reporting what had been passed on to him as to its origins. The Code of Hammurabi was a new codification of law, sure, several hundred years or so before the penning of Genesis...but it was several thousand years after God's institution of marriage...from the Biblical perspective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 6.5 |
JUC writes:
One of the reasons why I've raised this topic is because my best friend is going through a divorce. It's quite a messy affair, as they often are. He and his wife are fighting over money, rights to access to the children, and paying large amounts of money to lawyers of course. They are both suffering from depression and a general feeling of failure. They both seem bewildered and dazed by the whole thing. Neither of them are religious and it seems to me that they never really thought about or understood why they "got married" or what it meant to "be married". It seems that they were pushed into it by society's expectations, signed a pre-fabricated legal agreement that neither of them had any hand in, and they are now being dictated to by people and a system that doesn't care for them at all. It's just not right! Seems this is the moment where I should reveal my entropic theory of marriage, from the Laws of Thermodynamics. Consider that entropy, which we also have heard never decreases in the universe, is a measure of disorder. Things tend to progress from an orderly arrangement to a disorderly arrangement. In order to make something progress to a more orderly state, surrounding things must become more disordely. There can be a rough measure of how much work it takes to go from one to the other. A common example given is a building. To demolish it requires a few legal hoops and a few hours of planning and a few more to carefully plant the charges, then a few seconds to demolish it. Contrast that with the amount of time & effort it took to build that buiilding, or a new one in its place. The building is overwhelmingly regarded as being in a more orderly state than the rubble after the demolition. Now let's look at marriage. How hard is it to get married compared to how hard is it to get divorced. You can get married in 2 minutes in Las Vegas. Divorce takes years and costs a lot, requiring more effort on each part. Therefore being divorced is a more orderly state than being married. - xongsmith, 5.7d
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 185 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
And that old belief that husband and wife have to argue to make the marriage work? It's a load of bullshit. Just read you post. I agree totally. My wife and I have lived together for 5 years now and we have never raised our voices to each other once.
Again, my wife is brutally honest at times to me. I've heard her criticize me about everything from me being inconsiderate to my breath smelled. None has ever turned into a fight. I've only had a couple criticisms of my wife, and one of them is her being a little too emotional at times. Again, neither of us understand why people have the need to make such a big deal out of the tiniest things. I have a rotten temper and she is very forgetful and untidy but we file this under 'little things', as you seem to do.
Even when I was dragged to see that boring movie Brokeback Mountain, I went anyway without making a scene and endured almost 2 boring hours of gay cowboys kissing *shudders*. You think that's bad? I had to sit through '27 Dresses' but then she actually came to cinema to watch 'Predators', with me. It does not feel like compromise because of the buzz I get when she smiles.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 433 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Larni writes:
You, sir, have discovered the meaning of life. It does not feel like compromise because of the buzz I get when she smiles. "It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member Posts: 3985 From: Adirondackia Joined: Member Rating: 7.2 |
Amen.
Dost thou prate, rogue? -Cassio Real things always push back.-William James
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2972 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
It does not feel like compromise because of the buzz I get when she smiles. Is that a line from the movie, "How To Turn A Guy Gay In 10 Days"...? - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member Posts: 3985 From: Adirondackia Joined: Member Rating: 7.2 |
Now don't scorn marriage, oni.
I like it so much, I did it three times. Dost thou prate, rogue? -Cassio Real things always push back.-William James
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Tram law Member (Idle past 4726 days) Posts: 283 From: Weed, California, USA Joined: |
Yeah, some people have no problem with commitment. The just can't get enough of it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The point is this: Marriage goes back a minimum of 3,000 years before the Code of Hammurabi. Moses' penning of Genesis (whether you think he wrote it or not) did not institute marriage. It was in existence 3,500 years or so before this. Moses was merely reporting what had been passed on to him as to its origins. The Code of Hammurabi was a new codification of law, sure, several hundred years or so before the penning of Genesis...but it was several thousand years after God's institution of marriage...from the Biblical perspective. I'm not sure that there is any evidence that the source of the Code of Hammurabi is any different than the source for the mosaic laws. In either case, the institution of marriage was not some divine coupling but rather property rights. Marriage was about who would own the land, the animals, the productive hands. It was about establishing ownership of the women so that it cut down on fights. Marriage, particularly in the Bible, is about ownership, inheritance, welfare and conflict reduction. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024