Doesn't the distance of stars disprove the young earth theory?

There isn't much difference between both theories, both start with nothing! You can't get something from nothing! I don't think that humans can even comprehend nothingness!

Evolutionists giving the universe an age of around 15 billion yrs isn't even an educated guess, its just a guess.

There isn't much difference between both theories, both start with nothing!

Evolutionists giving the universe an age of around 15 billion yrs isn't even an educated guess, its just a guess. 64 billion, 27 million 50-twleve million, see, i can do it too!

The age of the universe is 13.75 0.11 billion[1] years (433.6 x 1015 seconds in SI units, or 13.75 Gigayears) within the Lambda-CDM concordance model.[2] This is however only the estimated time since the Big Bang. It is not known if something existed before the singularity that we call Big Bang, nor if time is linear, since the expansion estimated by Hubble's law assumed a linear expansion, and later work indicates there may have been variations.[3] The estimated changes in expansion are calculated to be both positive and negative, so Hubble and later estimates broadly agree.The uncertainty range for the age of the universe has been obtained by the agreement of a number of scientific research projects. These projects included microwave background radiation measurements by Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and other probes, and more ways to measure the expansion of the universe. Background radiation measurements give the cooling time of the universe since the Big Bang.[4] Expansion of the universe measurements give accurate data to calculate the age of the universe.

I don't think that humans can even comprehend nothingness!

It really is just about ego, one side wants to shove it in the others face.

What we should really be worried about, is the future, eh!