Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 51 (9179 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,177 Year: 5,434/9,624 Month: 459/323 Week: 99/204 Day: 15/26 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   At what point should we look for a non-materialistic explanation?
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 912 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 156 of 160 (539054)
12-12-2009 2:26 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by Bolder-dash
12-12-2009 2:19 PM


Re: Irony is certainly ironic, isn't it?
If you are going to refute these individuals based on their extreme faith, ok, but then you also need to discount anything Richard Dawkins and other ardent atheists say as well, for the exact same reasons.
Here, you are oh-so-wrong (not the first time). The difference between someone such as Dawkins, or damn near any atheist for that matter, is that they DO NOT let their beliefs cloud the facts as CMI, or any other such institute, so profoundly does.
I think i read upthread about you likening atheism to a belief system. i.e.: a belief in atheism. You should learn the batting order of the other team before selecting your rotation. (baseball pun, sorry Brits )
Edited by hooah212002, : corrected acronym, added sig
Edited by hooah212002, : spelling

Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by Bolder-dash, posted 12-12-2009 2:19 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024