Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 48 (9179 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,231 Year: 5,488/9,624 Month: 513/323 Week: 10/143 Day: 0/10 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   At what point should we look for a non-materialistic explanation?
Stile
Member (Idle past 159 days)
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 4 of 160 (537677)
11-30-2009 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Larni
11-30-2009 8:29 AM


When the Truth no longer matters
Larni writes:
So when should we look for non material explanations?
When we don't know the answer and we are scared.
I agree.
We should look for a non-materialistic explanation as soon as "understanding the truth" is no longer our highest priority.
Factors affecting this are emotions or time-management or other restricting concerns.
Once we turn to non-materialistic explanations, there is no way to confirm if our provided explanation is right, wrong, real, imagined, or even has anything to do with the phenomenon at all. Therefore, "understanding the truth" is an impossibility.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 11-30-2009 8:29 AM Larni has not replied

  
Stile
Member (Idle past 159 days)
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 9 of 160 (537692)
11-30-2009 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Huntard
11-30-2009 9:52 AM


Re: We should look for non-material explanations when....
Huntard writes:
We can measure and test the immaterium reliably. And not before.
Yes, that was my first thought.
But isn't the definition of a "material thing" something that can be measured and tested?
So I thought that once a non-material thing becomes testable and measureable... then it is no longer a non-material thing, and we're still not dealing with considering non-material answers... we're just finding new material things that we didn't know existed before.
But that's just semantics, and I may even be getting them wrong. Anyway, I agree with the sentiment of what you're saying, for sure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Huntard, posted 11-30-2009 9:52 AM Huntard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024