Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,745 Year: 4,002/9,624 Month: 873/974 Week: 200/286 Day: 7/109 Hour: 3/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   How creationism explains babies with tails
Junior Member (Idle past 4952 days)
Posts: 1
Joined: 10-02-2010

Message 8 of 59 (584469)
10-02-2010 12:44 AM

Vestigial limbs are something that evolution might predict and would certainly allow for due to inheritance of genetic information from ancestors.
Examples that are well documented include human's being born with tails, whales and dolphins with leg and pelvic girdles, snakes with legs, chickens with teeth. Most importantly vestigial body parts are only ever found in the species that are thought to have descended, due to genetic evidence, from species that we know do have those parts (i.e. human-tail/primate-tail, land-mammal-legs/whale-legs, lizard-teeth/chicken-teeth, lizard-legs/snake-legs).
How does ID account for these mutations? If chickens where created (and NOT evolved), they would not have need of the genetic information for teeth, nor whales and snakes for legs, nor of humans for tails.
Edited by Heaven32, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by jonnyk, posted 10-29-2010 12:30 PM Heaven32 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024