Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheist evolutionists: How far will you allow yourselves of sexual perversities?
Yrreg
Member (Idle past 4924 days)
Posts: 64
Joined: 11-21-2006


(2)
Message 1 of 152 (522726)
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


I get the idea from reading about the beliefs of atheist evolutionists that sex activities should not be restrained.
I have a question for you:
Atheist evolutionists: How far will you allow yourselves of sexual perversities?
Just be academic in your replies, no need to go into lurid details, keep to clinical words if you will.
Yrreg

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Rahvin, posted 09-04-2009 4:05 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 3 by bluescat48, posted 09-04-2009 4:05 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 4 by Theodoric, posted 09-04-2009 4:11 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 5 by DrJones*, posted 09-04-2009 4:12 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 6 by Perdition, posted 09-04-2009 4:17 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 7 by Coyote, posted 09-04-2009 4:34 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 8 by subbie, posted 09-04-2009 4:48 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 9 by kongstad, posted 09-04-2009 5:01 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 14 by dwise1, posted 09-04-2009 6:35 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 16 by mark24, posted 09-06-2009 8:35 AM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 18 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-06-2009 9:42 AM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 24 by Huntard, posted 09-07-2009 12:26 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 38 by mike the wiz, posted 09-08-2009 2:14 PM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 75 by Blue Jay, posted 09-11-2009 10:59 AM Yrreg has not replied
 Message 126 by menes777, posted 10-01-2010 4:06 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 2 of 152 (522731)
09-04-2009 4:05 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


What the...
How far will you allow yourselves of sexual perversities?
What?!
Who defines what is "perverse?"
Without going into "lurid details:"
So far as I can rationally determine, any act (sexual or otherwise) that doesn't hurt anyone else and is performed with full consent (meaning no children or animals,since they cannot consent) is just fine. Homosexual sex, anal sex, sane BDSM, bizarre positions, "furries," it doesn't matter how unusual, gross, or discomforting an act is to any particular person or group of people. If it's not hurting anyone and everyone involved is consenting, nobody else ethically has the right to stop them.
Of course, that doesn't mean that I'm personally turned on by all of those things. But, you know - rule 34. I've seen videos of Japanese girls vomiting on each others naked bodies. Didn't do anything more than amuse me, but I can't really call someone an "wicked pervert" if they get a stiffy from some vomit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by onifre, posted 09-04-2009 5:13 PM Rahvin has replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 3 of 152 (522732)
09-04-2009 4:05 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


Atheist evolutionists: How far will you allow yourselves of sexual perversities?
What do you mean by sexual perversites? What one person may seem as perverse someone else will find it not perverse.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9076
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.7


Message 4 of 152 (522734)
09-04-2009 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


I get the idea from reading about the beliefs of atheist evolutionists that sex activities should not be restrained.
What do you mean by this? What is the source for this? I would really like to know the source you were reading before I answer so I know what the hell you mean.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2284
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 5 of 152 (522735)
09-04-2009 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


How far will you allow yourselves of sexual perversities?
As long as everyone involved can and does give legal consent, I see no need for any limitations on sexual perversities.

It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry

Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, posted 09-21-2010 5:23 AM DrJones* has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3237 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 6 of 152 (522736)
09-04-2009 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


As Rahvin said, so long as everyone involved gave consent and no one is being greviously hurt, then I see no reason to tell them to stop.
Would I want to be involved in anything someone can come up with that falls within those two boundaries? Absolutely not.
Again, consent is required, so anyone not mentally developed enough to do so cannot do so. Where exactly that line is depends on the person, but the lines various states make between 16 and 18 is a good place to start.
If someone would really get off by having their arms broken, I think I would draw a line there, too, which is why I said grevious hurt above.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2105 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 7 of 152 (522739)
09-04-2009 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


Clarification needed
Before this question can be answered, you must advise us as to what "sexual perversities" might be?

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1254 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 8 of 152 (522740)
09-04-2009 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


I get the idea from reading about the beliefs of atheist evolutionists...
I'm curious; where have you been reading these ideas? And, do atheist evolutionists have different ideas from theist evolutionists?
I get the idea from reading the actual words of various elements of the godstapo that they think they ought to have the right to tell others what to do in the privacy of their own homes. Do you hold that belief? If so, whence does that perverse notion arise?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus. -- Thomas Jefferson
For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack Obama
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2869 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 9 of 152 (522742)
09-04-2009 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


Wel pretty much anything goes, except , and on this I must be firm, absolutely no sex in the missionary position between a man and his wife!
Or not - I forget.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by subbie, posted 09-04-2009 5:07 PM kongstad has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1254 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 10 of 152 (522746)
09-04-2009 5:07 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by kongstad
09-04-2009 5:01 PM


absolutely no sex in the missionary position between a man and his wife!
Seriously?
Damn! Last time I had sex in the missionary position between a man and his wife I had the time of my life.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus. -- Thomas Jefferson
For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack Obama
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by kongstad, posted 09-04-2009 5:01 PM kongstad has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 11 of 152 (522747)
09-04-2009 5:12 PM


This yrreg guy has posted extensively on the JREF forums, you might want to read some of the threads he's started over there.
If there is a God, and he made all things for a purpose, then yrreg's purpose is to give laughter to people who are smarter than he is.

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Yrreg, posted 09-20-2010 6:08 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2950 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 12 of 152 (522748)
09-04-2009 5:13 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Rahvin
09-04-2009 4:05 PM


Re: What the...
"furries,"
Dude, I recently found out what this actually was.
I have a friend who does a joke about going to comic con and seeing "furries," he then went on to explain what it was. I couldn't stop laughing. I think his punchline was something like "If you wanna dress up like an animal and have sex, then I should be allowed to masterbate...and shoot you..." in context it was funny.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Rahvin, posted 09-04-2009 4:05 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Rahvin, posted 09-04-2009 5:37 PM onifre has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 13 of 152 (522752)
09-04-2009 5:37 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by onifre
09-04-2009 5:13 PM


Re: What the...
Dude, I recently found out what this actually was.
I have a friend who does a joke about going to comic con and seeing "furries," he then went on to explain what it was. I couldn't stop laughing. I think his punchline was something like "If you wanna dress up like an animal and have sex, then I should be allowed to masterbate...and shoot you..." in context it was funny.
Rule 34 causes humor everywhere. Just look at your desk,and pick an object at random. It is nearly certain that someone, somewhere, finds that object arousing and wants to use it in a sexual way. Think of an action, any action,no matter how bizarre or boring or disgusting. It is nearly certain that someone, somewhere, gets really turned on by exactly that.
I know and have spoken to people who get all wound up over nosebleeds, dressing up like cartoon characters, and dozens of other crazy or odd things.
It is impossible to overestimate Rule 34.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by onifre, posted 09-04-2009 5:13 PM onifre has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5930
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.8


Message 14 of 152 (522770)
09-04-2009 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yrreg
09-04-2009 3:49 PM


I get the idea from reading about the beliefs of atheist evolutionists ...
And just who created those writing that you've been reading? In short, what are your sources?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yrreg, posted 09-04-2009 3:49 PM Yrreg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4929 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 15 of 152 (522893)
09-06-2009 7:12 AM


well, a man in japan recently had consensual sex with a bench at a bus stop
he had to be surgically removed
somethings gotta be said for boundaries lol

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-06-2009 8:43 AM Peg has replied
 Message 39 by Perdition, posted 09-08-2009 4:11 PM Peg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024