Can't ID be tested AT ALL?

A computer chip is a genius invention. It is relatively small yet it can store vast amounts of information. This invention showcases complexity: small object containing vast amount of information.Whoever invented the modern computer chip designed something tiny that holds a lot of information.Using this as a standard or gauge lets compare the computer chip with a single human cell: Only a Deity could invent a object infinetly smaller than a chip and have it contain infinetly more information.Complexity is measured in contrast to the best and most complex any intelligent person can produce. Identify these complexities wherever they are and the complexities in created/living things are infinetly more complex. IOW, the brilliance of an IDer is best seen and understood next to the second best anyone can find.Can any Darwinist describe or re-phrase the Dawkins quote without using terminology inferring design ?It takes the most brilliant men in our society to figure out nature and biology, it takes intelligence to communicate the findings, but it didn't take intelligence to produce creation. IOW, blind dunces called Chance and Accident are stumping the scientific community.No, what is apparent is that the status quo refuse to credit a Creator lest they give what they hate any legitimacy.Has anyone ever wondered why there are 60,000,000 definitions of Natural Selection ?If you put 10 Darwinists in a room they will produce 16 different definitions of Natural Selection. The REASON there is no one universal defintion of Natural Selection is because of the awesome complexity of nature.We now know complexity is the mark and m.o. of the Divine - which is logical. The brighter You/you are the increased capacity to understand and produce complexity. IC systems showcase Divine complexity.The inability to produce one coherent and universal definition of Natural Selection is because nature is extremely complex, IOW God has produced a cosmology so complex He has confused Darwinian ranks attempting to define the mechanism which produced the complexity.IOW, the infinite definitions of Natural Selection prove the IDer.HereptonThis message has been edited by Herepton, 09-14-2005 08:28 PM

Hi Chiroptera:You have a funny way of admitting your inability to refute. The methods were explained. I evidenced two: computer chip v. human cell and the complexity of nature contrasted next to the inability of Darwinists to produce one universal definition of Natural Selection.HereptonThis message has been edited by Herepton, 09-14-2005 08:51 PM

Hi Bat Friend:But then you do understand what I am saying ?Obviously I did not postulate a mathematical measurement and/or equation.FACT: The brighter a person is equals the increased ability, capacity, and capability to understand and produce complexity.Computer chip v. human cell.The person who designed the cell is infinetly more brighter based on the known disparity between the two objects. The chip can accurately be likened to computers of the 1950's that took up the space equal to entire floors. The cell is a lap top.Complexity is measured by comparison to known undisputed examples. Any astronomic disparity in favor of increased complexity equals ID unless of course your philisophy does not allow the conclusion.Henry Herepton the Reptile