Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,401 Year: 3,658/9,624 Month: 529/974 Week: 142/276 Day: 16/23 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Don't get it (Re: Ape to Man - where did the hair go?)
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 16 of 116 (96348)
03-31-2004 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Coragyps
03-31-2004 11:05 AM


cover pic
this one?
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0670031100.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Coragyps, posted 03-31-2004 11:05 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 116 (96352)
03-31-2004 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by mike the wiz
03-31-2004 8:02 AM


quote:
I don't seek hair like an apes, but I do wonder why we are bare butted.
Actually, we are not bare butted. There is hair there, but it is so fine that it is hard to feel. In fact, we have just as much hair as any other ape, but the thickness varies on different parts of the body. Next time you get goosebumps/goosepimples, just look at all the hair standing up on your arm and imagine each single strand as being as thick as the hair on your head. Just as an aside, some primates also have male patterned baldness, which might make Ned feel a little better.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 8:02 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by NosyNed, posted 03-31-2004 1:25 PM Loudmouth has not replied
 Message 22 by Coragyps, posted 03-31-2004 2:07 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 18 of 116 (96354)
03-31-2004 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Loudmouth
03-31-2004 1:11 PM


... which might make Ned feel a little better.
AND just WHAT did I do to deserve that?? I'll have you know that some significant fraction of women find bald sexy! Geez!
But on topic. Mike commented about losing information. This is a bit of an oversimplification. As noted elsewhere it depends on what the, in this case hair loss, genetic change was. It might be a simple mutation in a control that could have some not too small probability of being reversed. The hair loss could even be due to the addition of some inhibitor with some complexity. In that case any "break" of the inhibition would bring back the trait being inhibited.
It isn't as simple as "losing" a gene for hair.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Loudmouth, posted 03-31-2004 1:11 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1525 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 19 of 116 (96356)
03-31-2004 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by WiseMan
03-30-2004 7:52 PM


In Africa there was a tremendous drought that caused the trees over time to recede. Hence the African savannah. Arborial apes over time began to decend more and more to the grasslands to exploit the new nich. Tall grasslands and predation perhaps led to Bipedalism and the scavanging adaptatations freed up the hands , which in turn increased intelligence. Hair as another member suggested was not advantageous and the gene for hairyness through mutation and natural selection was not propagated. Fast forward....Homosapiens sapiens year 2004. This is theory but is supported by facts we evolved from arborial apes on the plains of Africa to eventually become the domiant creature on the Earth. Evolution experts feel free to nit pick and correct my laymans understanding of this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by WiseMan, posted 03-30-2004 7:52 PM WiseMan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Loudmouth, posted 03-31-2004 1:46 PM 1.61803 has replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 116 (96360)
03-31-2004 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by 1.61803
03-31-2004 1:35 PM


quote:
This is theory but is supported by facts we evolved from arborial apes on the plains of Africa to eventually become the domiant creature on the Earth. Evolution experts feel free to nit pick and correct my laymans understanding of this.
Being a microbiologist, I really don't see man as the dominant creature. We are still around at the whim of our single celled bretheren for many reasons, but that is another topic for another day.
The Aquatic Ape theory is also interesting, and may explain the reduction in hair thickness. Some info can be found here. I am not endorsing this theory by any means, but it is an interesting alternative to the "out into the savannah" theory. It might also explain our emotional and sexual ties to water. If I remember correctly, the current Out of Africa expansion of humans has them moving up the coasts of Africa. Anyway, just food for thought.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by 1.61803, posted 03-31-2004 1:35 PM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by 1.61803, posted 03-31-2004 2:06 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1525 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 21 of 116 (96366)
03-31-2004 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Loudmouth
03-31-2004 1:46 PM


Hi Loud mouth,
I read a book about aquatic apes. Cant remember the name but yes it was interesting. As far as (dominant) I was refering to mammals. I dont want to insult our singlecelled brethren. They by far have the crown when it comes to numbers/distribution/ adaptation and exploitation of niches. I hear they are even finding them in Ice cores now? I was giving the most universal explaination; aquatic apes would of been laughed out of the water. Pun intended.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Loudmouth, posted 03-31-2004 1:46 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 22 of 116 (96367)
03-31-2004 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Loudmouth
03-31-2004 1:11 PM


Actually, we are not bare butted. There is hair there, but it is so fine that it is hard to feel.
Fortunately for all of you, you haven't seen my butt. If I could knit, I could make a sweater for a chihuahua from the shearings I could harvest back there.
And then, I had six wisdom teeth, like, say, a chimpanzee does......

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Loudmouth, posted 03-31-2004 1:11 PM Loudmouth has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by coffee_addict, posted 03-31-2004 4:31 PM Coragyps has not replied
 Message 32 by nator, posted 04-27-2004 12:09 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 23 of 116 (96419)
03-31-2004 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by mike the wiz
03-31-2004 8:02 AM


I read something about Natural Selection that says if you lose the information then you can't get it back.
Yeah, but it's not a forgone conclusion that it would take a destructive mutation to cause thin hair.
For instance it could be that, like skin color, having a certain number of gene repetitions controls hair thinness - more of a certain gene, thicker hair. Just like two light-colored people could have a dark-colored child, you could have much, much thicker hair than either of your parents.
Like I said, though, I'm not familiar enough with the genetics of hair to say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 8:02 AM mike the wiz has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 498 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 24 of 116 (96424)
03-31-2004 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Coragyps
03-31-2004 2:07 PM


quote:
Fortunately for all of you, you haven't seen my butt. If I could knit, I could make a sweater for a chihuahua from the shearings I could harvest back there.
And then, I had six wisdom teeth, like, say, a chimpanzee does......
Unlike you, my body is almost as bare as my computer monitor... or Ned's head
But seriously, 6 wisdom teeth? Are you some kind of mutant?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Coragyps, posted 03-31-2004 2:07 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by NosyNed, posted 03-31-2004 4:34 PM coffee_addict has not replied
 Message 26 by Loudmouth, posted 03-31-2004 4:43 PM coffee_addict has not replied
 Message 33 by nator, posted 04-27-2004 12:19 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 25 of 116 (96426)
03-31-2004 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by coffee_addict
03-31-2004 4:31 PM


mutants
But seriously, 6 wisdom teeth? Are you some kind of mutant?
The word might not be 'mutant' but rather 'throwback'. I, on the other hand, am an example of the opposite: a more highly evolved specimen. You can tell by the continuing loss of hair.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by coffee_addict, posted 03-31-2004 4:31 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 116 (96428)
03-31-2004 4:43 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by coffee_addict
03-31-2004 4:31 PM


quote:
But seriously, 6 wisdom teeth? Are you some kind of mutant?
If you think that's bad, I had eight. I still hold the record at my oral surgeons office 10 years later. Too bad number of wisdom teeth doesn't correlate with wisdom, otherwise I would have hit the jackpot.
Just to get back on topic, does anyone know about the variation in dentition among other primate species. I am wondering if this is a strictly human affliction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by coffee_addict, posted 03-31-2004 4:31 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Gary
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 116 (96446)
03-31-2004 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by mike the wiz
03-31-2004 8:02 AM


quote:
I read something about Natural Selection that says if you lose the information then you can't get it back.
I don't think this is true. Walking stick insects have evolved and lost wings several times, though the process took millions of years.
Newsroom - The Source - Washington University in St. Louis
Page Not Found | Cleveland Museum of Natural History

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 8:02 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by crashfrog, posted 03-31-2004 6:10 PM Gary has not replied
 Message 55 by zephyr, posted 04-27-2004 3:17 PM Gary has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 28 of 116 (96449)
03-31-2004 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Gary
03-31-2004 6:04 PM


I don't think this is true. Walking stick insects have evolved and lost wings several times, though the process took millions of years.
But in that case, the wings they got back weren't the wings they had, as I recall, so I think Mike is still mostly correct.
There's nothing that would prevent the regaining of lost information. But it would be only as likely to happen as it was for that organism to gain that information the first time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Gary, posted 03-31-2004 6:04 PM Gary has not replied

  
pbaylis
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 116 (103057)
04-27-2004 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by crashfrog
03-30-2004 8:23 PM


Whatever
Man never lost the hair of the apes because man never had that much hair in the first place. Hair follicles does not equal hair! My hair follicles don't keep me warm. Don't insult our intelligence. This guy has a right to be confused listening to the crap you jokers come up with.
It is DEvolution to lose one's hair which is required for warmth in nearly every country except the lands where the Garden of Eden was located, where people can be warm night and day without a single hair (follicle) or scrap of clothing.
So, here's the total truth. Man was created to exist in the Garden of Eden, where clothing and hair were not required for warmth. Man was evicted from the Garden of Eden after the fall. Now man suffers in the cold and needs to wear clothes. Why is that so hard to digest? Science, after all these years and with all that combined intelligence still cannot explain why man lost his hair. They skip around the subject and don't know WHAT to do about it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by crashfrog, posted 03-30-2004 8:23 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
pbaylis
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 116 (103058)
04-27-2004 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by crashfrog
03-30-2004 8:23 PM


Whatever
Man never lost the hair of the apes because man never had that much hair in the first place. Hair follicles does not equal hair! My hair follicles don't keep me warm. Don't insult our intelligence. This guy has a right to be confused listening to the crap you jokers come up with.
It is DEvolution to lose one's hair which is required for warmth in nearly every country except the lands where the Garden of Eden was located, where people can be warm night and day without a single hair (follicle) or scrap of clothing.
So, here's the total truth. Man was created to exist in the Garden of Eden, where clothing and hair were not required for warmth. Man was evicted from the Garden of Eden after the fall. Now man suffers in the cold and needs to wear clothes. Why is that so hard to digest? Science, after all these years and with all that combined intelligence still cannot explain why man lost his hair. They skip around the subject and don't know WHAT to do about it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by crashfrog, posted 03-30-2004 8:23 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by NosyNed, posted 04-27-2004 11:32 AM pbaylis has replied
 Message 36 by Loudmouth, posted 04-27-2004 1:22 PM pbaylis has replied
 Message 59 by crashfrog, posted 04-27-2004 6:13 PM pbaylis has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024