Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9178 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Anig
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,102 Year: 5,359/9,624 Month: 384/323 Week: 24/204 Day: 24/21 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lucy - fact or fraud?
Clark
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 47 (333554)
07-19-2006 10:06 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
06-06-2006 8:54 PM


The Cleveland Museum of Natural History.
I just saw Lucy about a half hour ago. I live about 5 minutes away from the museum responsible for finding her. Pretty cool sight.
There was no indication at the museum that she is a hoax.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 06-06-2006 8:54 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by RAZD, posted 07-20-2006 7:06 AM Clark has not replied

Clark
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 47 (336042)
07-28-2006 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by pop
07-28-2006 10:41 AM


Australopithecus Afarensis are apes that could walk bipedally.
A. afarensis existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago. Afarensis had an apelike face with a low forehead, a bony ridge over the eyes, a flat nose, and no chin. They had protruding jaws with large back teeth. Cranial capacity varied from about 375 to 550 cc. The skull is similar to that of a chimpanzee, except for the more humanlike teeth. The canine teeth are much smaller than those of modern apes, but larger and more pointed than those of humans, and shape of the jaw is between the rectangular shape of apes and the parabolic shape of humans. However their pelvis and leg bones far more closely resemble those of modern man, and leave no doubt that they were bipedal (although adapted to walking rather than running (Leakey 1994)). Their bones show that they were physically very strong. Females were substantially smaller than males, a condition known as sexual dimorphism. Height varied between about 107 cm (3'6") and 152 cm (5'0"). The finger and toe bones are curved and proportionally longer than in humans, but the hands are similar to humans in most other details (Johanson and Edey 1981). Most scientists consider this evidence that afarensis was still partially adapted to climbing in trees, others consider it evolutionary baggage.
So yes, Australopithecines were apes, but they had some human characteristics as well.
This link shows a comparison of the pelvis, femur, and foot of australopithecines, chimpanzees, and humans. Link

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by pop, posted 07-28-2006 10:41 AM pop has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024