macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3947 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: 05-24-2004
|
|
Message 38 of 202 (450727)
01-23-2008 11:46 AM
|
Reply to: Message 15 by dwise1
01-18-2008 8:06 PM
|
|
i wonder if there has been an increase in maternal mortality due to large-headed babies since the invention of the c-section. i.e. large-headedness can survive sometimes, but when a c-section isn't available, the mother is more likely to die.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 15 by dwise1, posted 01-18-2008 8:06 PM | | dwise1 has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 39 by Jaderis, posted 01-23-2008 2:07 PM | | macaroniandcheese has replied |
|
macaroniandcheese
Suspended Member (Idle past 3947 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: 05-24-2004
|
|
|
Message 40 of 202 (450761)
01-23-2008 3:49 PM
|
Reply to: Message 39 by Jaderis
01-23-2008 2:07 PM
|
|
the more important issue is where the parents were born, then, and not where the current pregnancy is taking place. or rather, whether the current pregnancy is taking place in an area with less access to c-sections.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 39 by Jaderis, posted 01-23-2008 2:07 PM | | Jaderis has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2