Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,828 Year: 4,085/9,624 Month: 956/974 Week: 283/286 Day: 4/40 Hour: 4/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why are there no human apes alive today?
Peg
Member (Idle past 4957 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 93 of 1075 (525909)
09-25-2009 8:06 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Rahvin
06-18-2009 12:51 PM


Rahvin writes:
Have you heard of taxonomy? Terms like "genus," "phyla," "family," species?" We group organisms according to their common features, and it helps us see where new branches of the family tree formed.
of course this is despite the fact that the fossil record strongly indicates that the major kinds of plants and animals appeared abruptly and did not evolve into other kinds, even over aeons of time

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Rahvin, posted 06-18-2009 12:51 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by bluescat48, posted 09-25-2009 9:49 AM Peg has replied
 Message 95 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-25-2009 9:49 AM Peg has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4957 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 96 of 1075 (525951)
09-25-2009 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Dr Adequate
09-25-2009 9:49 AM


DrAdequate writes:
This is why paleontologists, who, unlike you, spend their lives studying the fossil record, do not agree with your fantasies about the fossil record.
In The New Evolutionary Timetable, Steven Stanley spoke of the general failure of the record to display gradual transitions from one major group to another. He said: The known fossil record is not, and never has been, in accord with [slow evolution].
Niles Eldredge also admitted: The pattern that we were told to find for the last 120 years does not exist.
its this that has led to other radical theories such as life started elswhere and landed here on a meteorite. The World Book Encyclopedia says that Many biologists think new species may be produced by sudden, drastic changes in genes. this is proposed because the fossils show sudden fully formed animals rather then progressive changes.
You would think that with all the millions of fossils collected, there would be at least some evidence to show that one kind of life turns into another kind. But the gaps between different types of life found in the fossil record, as well as the gaps between different types of living things on earth today, still persist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-25-2009 9:49 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Huntard, posted 09-25-2009 10:28 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 101 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-25-2009 10:48 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 102 by Percy, posted 09-25-2009 10:49 AM Peg has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4957 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 97 of 1075 (525954)
09-25-2009 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by bluescat48
09-25-2009 9:49 AM


bluescat48 writes:
Where is the evidence to this?
biologist Jonathan Wells writes: At the level of kingdoms, phyla, and classes, descent with modification from common ancestors is obviously not an observed fact. To judge from the fossil and molecular evidence, it’s not even a well-supported theory.
many within the field are seeing it for themselves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by bluescat48, posted 09-25-2009 9:49 AM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by Huntard, posted 09-25-2009 10:29 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 100 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-25-2009 10:38 AM Peg has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024