Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,808 Year: 3,065/9,624 Month: 910/1,588 Week: 93/223 Day: 4/17 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why are there no human apes alive today?
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 38 of 1075 (512716)
06-20-2009 8:16 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Doubletime
06-20-2009 6:55 AM


Re: misreading? or trolling?
Ps i pity theese retards not understanding how impossibel abiogenisis is.
So give me evidence that abiogenesis is impossible.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Doubletime, posted 06-20-2009 6:55 AM Doubletime has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Doubletime, posted 06-20-2009 12:04 PM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 60 of 1075 (515626)
07-20-2009 12:36 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by traste
07-19-2009 11:36 PM


quote:
quote:
How would the primitive apes have survied along side with the most advanced form of humans. While all the semi humans died out ?
Again excellent question, since evolutionary theory predicted that as organasism advanced they are more suited than there predescors. So where are those apemen? Proponents of evolution are just bluffing
No primitive apes have survived only the modern apes, that is, modern gibbons, modern orangutans, modern gorillas, modern chimps & modern humans.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by traste, posted 07-19-2009 11:36 PM traste has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by traste, posted 08-20-2009 2:33 AM bluescat48 has replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 77 of 1075 (520270)
08-20-2009 8:32 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by traste
08-20-2009 2:33 AM


My point is since apemen is more advance than modern apes,orangutans, and many other types of monkeys,then (Why is it there is no other ape men living today?)
Who said anything about monkeys? Monkeys aren't apes. Apemen are no more advanced that other apes, just different. For the same reason that their are only 2 species of Chimpanzee & one species of Gorilla adaptation. Those species that could adapt, survived, those that couldn't became extinct.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by traste, posted 08-20-2009 2:33 AM traste has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by traste, posted 09-23-2009 11:42 PM bluescat48 has replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 90 of 1075 (525617)
09-24-2009 12:05 AM
Reply to: Message 89 by traste
09-23-2009 11:42 PM


Why they survived?
The point is they didn't survive. The other apes & Homo sapiens survived but the so called apemen didn't.
Me writes:
Apemen are no more advanced that other apes, just different.
If, according to your statement, the apemen should have survived since they were "More advanced."

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by traste, posted 09-23-2009 11:42 PM traste has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by traste, posted 09-25-2009 11:32 PM bluescat48 has replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 94 of 1075 (525943)
09-25-2009 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Peg
09-25-2009 8:06 AM


Peg writes:
of course this is despite the fact that the fossil record strongly indicates that the major kinds of plants and animals appeared abruptly and did not evolve into other kinds, even over aeons of time
Where is the evidence to this? Where does it show any abrupt appearance? Most of the main phyla appeared over about a 20 million year period, the last time I checked, that is a little longer than abrupt.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Peg, posted 09-25-2009 8:06 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Peg, posted 09-25-2009 10:16 AM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


(1)
Message 113 of 1075 (526154)
09-26-2009 1:05 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by traste
09-25-2009 11:32 PM


How does they didn't survive, violate the theory of evolution. Ever heard of survival of the fittest? Those that could adapt survived ie: certain species of the genera, Gorilla, Pan & Homo.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by traste, posted 09-25-2009 11:32 PM traste has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by traste, posted 09-26-2009 1:30 AM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 245 of 1075 (621138)
06-24-2011 2:34 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by ZenMonkey
06-23-2011 8:39 PM


Re: More evolved?
Good post and totally correct.
Particularly
There is no such thing as "more or less evolved."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by ZenMonkey, posted 06-23-2011 8:39 PM ZenMonkey has seen this message but not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 350 of 1075 (621438)
06-25-2011 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 346 by Mazzy
06-25-2011 9:52 PM


Re: More evolved?
A cow is Bovinae
and so is a bison, water buffalo, yak, eland, 4 horned antelope & a kudu. I take it then these are all the same kind?

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 346 by Mazzy, posted 06-25-2011 9:52 PM Mazzy has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 412 of 1075 (621732)
06-28-2011 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 407 by Portillo
06-28-2011 5:01 AM


Re: More evolved?
I believe that God exists.
So what does that have to do with this topic?
topic writes:
Why are there no human apes alive today.
Whether god exists or not is totally irrelevant.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 407 by Portillo, posted 06-28-2011 5:01 AM Portillo has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 537 of 1075 (622332)
07-02-2011 11:54 AM
Reply to: Message 515 by Mazzy
07-02-2011 5:25 AM


Re: More evolved?
I have given three points that address the topic. Now you explain why something like Neanderthal, with a bigger brain than us, went extinct? Why did all the other millions of side species in last 5 million years all go extinct? This is your problem.
There are numerous reasons a larger, stronger species may go extinct while the smaller, weaker may survive.
ie: Why did the smaller Carcharodon carcharius (Great white shark) survive while the much larger Carcharodon megalodon
become extinct? The size of the brain of Neanderthal has very little do with survival. Bigger isn't necessarily better. One could say the sapiens was better at adapting to change than was neanderthal, similarly carcharius was more adaptable than megalodon. The same reason there are no dragonflies with 4 foot wingspans as of those in the Carboniferous period.
If the sapiens, at the time of the Neanderthals were anything like there modern descendants, they were probably instrumental in the demise of the Neanderthals. We do do very good job of being invasive wherever we go, having caused the extinction of many species.
Edited by bluescat48, : qs goof

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 515 by Mazzy, posted 07-02-2011 5:25 AM Mazzy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 541 by Nuggin, posted 07-02-2011 12:01 PM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4189 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 659 of 1075 (622876)
07-07-2011 3:13 AM
Reply to: Message 652 by Mazzy
07-06-2011 3:37 PM


Re: Mazzy's Clock
Myths change with time and so does your theory.
The only time myths change is when they are accepted by a different culture ie: the Flood myth that led to the Gilgamesh flood myth and the Noachin flood myth. Each were changed to match the beliefs of those adopting the myth.
Theories change when new evidence is found to either falsify or change part of the earlier theory. It doesn't change based on culture.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 652 by Mazzy, posted 07-06-2011 3:37 PM Mazzy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024