Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,433 Year: 3,690/9,624 Month: 561/974 Week: 174/276 Day: 14/34 Hour: 0/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why are there no human apes alive today?
Iblis
Member (Idle past 3917 days)
Posts: 663
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 159 of 1075 (534629)
11-09-2009 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Doubletime
06-18-2009 6:06 AM


why are there no human apes alive today
Because we killed them. They occupied land that we wanted, and they were different from us, and we turned out be smarter and better-organized. So we killed them and took their land.
But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee [for] an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
--Deuteronomy 20:16
If they had been able to produce offspring with us some of their descendants might be in existence today. But if so, then they would be us, as opposed to them, wouldn't they?
The reason there are a very small number of somewhat-less-human apes like chimps and gorillas still alive now is because they adapted to live in niche territories that we didn't (until relatively recently) much want.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Doubletime, posted 06-18-2009 6:06 AM Doubletime has not replied

Iblis
Member (Idle past 3917 days)
Posts: 663
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 427 of 1075 (621983)
06-29-2011 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 425 by Taq
06-29-2011 5:10 PM


Re: More evolved?
If you found a fossil with a mixture of ape and dog features then you would falsify the theory.
Nope, not at all.
Though a good line of argument in principle I guess, it's doomed to fail when very closely-related mammals like dogs or pigs are used as the goat. But sure, show us whatever, ape / cuttlefish similarities. That ought to do the trick. Something disssstant.
Main flaw in Mazzy's argument (beyond sheer chronic inaccuracy) is that its a long-since PRATT. There's no viable "missing link" question anymore, since the genetic evidence started rolling in. The same test that proves someone is that baby-daddy also independently confirms that the nesting predicted by cladistics and found profusely in the fossil record in the geologic table, is in fact evident in data suitable for family court as well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 425 by Taq, posted 06-29-2011 5:10 PM Taq has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 429 by Mazzy, posted 06-30-2011 2:33 PM Iblis has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024