I could not tell if you admins wanted more content or no bare links. I really only wanted to let Brennakimi know I agreed with the slant in the post I responded to. I could have done it without posting some interesting material from the past. Besides I really had first thought to say that hopefully what is presented in this article does not occur in the study of
floresiensis as Andya has aptly reported but I wanted to first only respond to Brennakimi and not wake up the whole thread. With both of you two responding before others there is no way I can tell which is the correct way to edit. I hope this is sufficient. If not delete the post and leave the sar-casm, it is deep but no longer the dark nursery it was.
The article describes a situtation in biology in the 30s in which the American Indians are compared to Neanderthals and (it)atttempts to explain how humans might learn from fossils. This would apply in the current case (see "imagine" a "group" on the last page etc.) but hopefully not with the same tone.
I am still a little unsure how to get the tumbs to line up as percy first said.
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 03-09-2005 13:19 AM