I'll agree with you that CS's post was purely abusive, adding nothing to discourse. Though I would note Crash's post really wasn't much better.
I'll also agree that Crash can pepper otherwise well written posts with unnecessary vitriol. I'm not sure if good content excuses abusive language, but I get what you're saying and agree.
Like I said, I was just kidding. If swearing was allowed then I wouldn't have thought anything about it. That kind of stuff doesn't bother me, other than its not very useful. I was just surprised, given that I thought that was verboten around here, he didn't even get a verbal warning. And then to see to see CA get the whammy so quick and it suggested that CS owes brenna an apology... well okay then, I'd like mine! Heheheh.
Your point is noted, but then the rules might be made clearer. Is swearing allowed at all, or at others, given sufficient argument otherwise? You don't have to answer, just something to think about (and not just you, I'm not trying to single you out) in the future.
h
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." - Robert E. Howard