Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abusive Assumptions
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 61 of 64 (194929)
03-28-2005 8:59 AM


Thread copied to the Is ID Science? (was "Abusive Assumptions") thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.
This message has been edited by Admin, 03-28-2005 09:05 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by JonF, posted 03-28-2005 9:25 AM Admin has not replied

JonF
Member (Idle past 168 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 62 of 64 (194936)
03-28-2005 9:25 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Admin
03-28-2005 8:59 AM


this copy of the thread has been closed.
No, it hasn't.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Admin, posted 03-28-2005 8:59 AM Admin has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2170 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 63 of 64 (194943)
03-28-2005 9:57 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by commike37
03-25-2005 1:08 AM


Re: A Simple Solution
quote:
I challeng you to find one piece of pro-creation or anti-evolution evidence from that website [this should be an easy challenge, but I'll make the next one harder if you succeed].
Uh, go to just about any one of the essays regarding any science topic at TO and you will find, right at the top near the title, at least a couple of links to Creationist rebuttals, and also scientific rebuttals to those rebuttals, etc.
In this way, TO does not try to shield the reader from the Creationist viewpoint; in fact, it provided it for the reader. In this way, the reader can read what everyone has to say on the given topic and decide for themselves.
Can you show me a ID or Creationist website which repeatedly links to TO articles and information in order to let the reader see the other viewpoints?
quote:
There's a serious issue of resource allocation here, that is, allocating research to an evolutionary viewpoint solely. How do you call such exclusion true science?
Well, yes, if the science proves to be productive and useful.
The study of Evolution, Geology, Genetics 9including Population Genetics), Chemistry, Physics, etc. has been shown to be quite fruitful.
Can you show me what increase in understanding, or development of new therapies or technologies have come about as a result of Creationism or Intelligent Design?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by commike37, posted 03-25-2005 1:08 AM commike37 has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 64 of 64 (194951)
03-28-2005 10:37 AM


See message 61 - Topic closed
Closed, closed, closed.
Adminnemooseus

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024