Topic Proposal Issues

I'd really like to see him explain why the earth has a cold core. I have a ton of questions for him to consider, plus the fact that the earth's core is hot can be determined by "present state science" and that this core actually exists in the present.All his objections are based off of natural laws not applying down there (yet he has no reason) or that our assumption of heat is based off of past (and even totally unrelated events).I'm willing to do a great debate if you all don't want it opened to the whole community. I also don't think he should go unchallenged with his assumptions and "logic".Kuresu

---

"Have the Courage to Know!" --Immanuel Kant" One useless man is a disgrace. Two are called a law firm. Three or more are called a congress" --paraphrased, John AdamsWant to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.

He may not learn anything from the debate, but hopefully those who watch will. And what they would learn is why Simple is wrong.Simple can shout "VICTORY" all day long, but as ray so loves to put: "objective people will see who has won (paraphrased)".I do believe it is largely for this reason that Anglagard tackled S1WC and RAZD tackled Simple in their respective Great Debate threads.