Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 53 (9179 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,125 Year: 5,382/9,624 Month: 407/323 Week: 47/204 Day: 23/24 Hour: 3/2

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member

Message 14 of 302 (291851)
03-03-2006 2:50 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Admin
03-03-2006 2:03 PM

Re: Unfair to Crashfrog?
I don't know how often Tal questions people's honesty and integrity
It might be worth checking out the two times he's done it today.
In neither case did Tal explain why he accused his opponent of dishonesty; he just tossed it out as an insult. In Tal's most recent post in each thread, the accusation of dishonesty was the only thing said.
If Crash is being suspended for a pattern of posts which "range from the trivial, the off-topic and the inappropriately acerbic to the brilliant," shouldn't Tal receive the same treatment for posts that range only from the trivial to the off-topic and inappropriately acerbic?
And so there's a strong tendency on the part of moderators to give the creationists freer rein.
Neither argument has anything to do with evolution or Creationism. They are political arguments.

"We had survived to turn on the History Channel
And ask our esteemed panel, Why are we alive? And here's how they replied:
You're what happens when two substances collide
And by all accounts you really should have died."
-Andrew Bird

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Admin, posted 03-03-2006 2:03 PM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Admin, posted 03-04-2006 10:44 AM Dan Carroll has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024