Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9181 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: joebialek123
Post Volume: Total: 918,277 Year: 5,534/9,624 Month: 559/323 Week: 56/143 Day: 18/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 302 (298420)
03-26-2006 8:15 PM


Hi Robinrohan,
I think you must be looking at the wrong messages when you conclude this:
robinrohan writes:
Now, as you can see, I have not made any personal comments about you.
The personal comment that's been mentioned came in your Message 74 where you said:
A typical tactic by Jar. If he doesn't want to talk about something, he says it's off-topic.
In my reply I said that I felt that Christ's sacrifice for our sins needed explanation for how it tied into the thread's topic, otherwise it would be best taken to a more appropriate thread.
That's not what I'm talking about Percy. Look at message #121 and tell me there's no bias there.

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Faith, posted 03-26-2006 8:37 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 302 (298430)
03-26-2006 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Faith
03-26-2006 8:37 PM


No mistake.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Faith, posted 03-26-2006 8:37 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Admin, posted 03-26-2006 8:45 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 302 (298455)
03-26-2006 10:33 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by AdminAsgara
03-26-2006 9:01 PM


The thread had begun to revolve around what's "wrong" with theistic evolution and jar's beliefs instead of the topic of "What evidence absolutely rules out a Creator"
No, it was a claim that I was personally attacking Jar, which was not the case. Moreover, my remark was not off-topic.
An obvious bias.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by AdminAsgara, posted 03-26-2006 9:01 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 122 of 302 (303803)
04-13-2006 8:17 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by AdminPD
04-12-2006 10:10 PM


Re: Misplaced thread?
The thread is not scientific, but philosophical, and should be moved.
There should be a forum called "philosophy"--neither religious not scientific. I live, as Jar said, in a "philosophical fantasy world," and so often find it hard to find a slot for my topics.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by AdminPD, posted 04-12-2006 10:10 PM AdminPD has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 186 of 302 (305734)
04-21-2006 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by Ooook!
04-21-2006 4:00 PM


Re: A bit of clarification
What a load of political correctness. Those comparisons are not the same at all.

"A man with a good car doesn't have to be justified"---Flannery O'Connor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by Ooook!, posted 04-21-2006 4:00 PM Ooook! has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 222 of 302 (311317)
05-12-2006 12:39 AM


You want to go ahead and promote that thread by Faith about faith? Some are interested.

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 225 of 302 (313898)
05-20-2006 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 224 by AdminNWR
05-16-2006 9:53 AM


Re: robinrohan's complaint proposal
Those who have the courage to argue about things they know little about must accept that uninformed ideas will be given short shrift
What is it that I know little about?
Edited by AdminJar, : off topic for the thread

This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by AdminNWR, posted 05-16-2006 9:53 AM AdminNWR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 226 by AdminJar, posted 05-20-2006 12:58 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 227 of 302 (313979)
05-20-2006 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 226 by AdminJar
05-20-2006 12:58 PM


Re: robinrohan's complaint proposal
In which thread do I discuss my shortcomings?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by AdminJar, posted 05-20-2006 12:58 PM AdminJar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by AdminJar, posted 05-20-2006 7:09 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 229 of 302 (314041)
05-20-2006 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 228 by AdminJar
05-20-2006 7:09 PM


Re: robinrohan's complaint proposal
How very amusing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by AdminJar, posted 05-20-2006 7:09 PM AdminJar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 230 by Adminnemooseus, posted 05-20-2006 11:36 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 238 of 302 (314288)
05-22-2006 9:03 AM
Reply to: Message 237 by Faith
05-22-2006 12:43 AM


Re: yes, definitely a misunderstanding
Percy closed the thread, saying that I should expect to be treated with contempt if I have the nerve to talk about something I know little about. So I wanted to know what it was I knew little about.
If the answer is "logic," I have a problem with that. That's tantamount to saying that I am incapable of making a valid comment about any subject whatsoever.
If the answer is "science," my answer is I don't discuss science except in some very general way, such as the rudiments of TOE, which, strangely enough, I do understand.
Here's my dramatized view of the situation (from threads long past and recent):
Robin: One cannot be both an evolutionist and a
Christian.
Jar: What did you say? I am both an evolutionist and a Christian. I have a list of 4000 Bishops who say they believe in evolution. You are hereby refuted.
Robin: What I meant was that it was logically inconsistent to--
Chiroptera: You don't understand logic!
Jazzn: He shouldn't even use the word "logic." Only I and those of my superior ilk should be able to use that word.
Chiroptera: Have you studied Peano arithmetic?
Catholic scientist: Do you have a world class education? I do. You are despicable.
Jar.: QED. You lose, Charley.
Percy: What are your credentials? You have none.
Robin: My credentials?
Moose: Whiner! Suspended for a week!
revised to corrrect errors of wording. I wrote "creationist" when I meant "Christian."
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 237 by Faith, posted 05-22-2006 12:43 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 239 by Admin, posted 05-22-2006 9:36 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 241 of 302 (314309)
05-22-2006 10:11 AM
Reply to: Message 239 by Admin
05-22-2006 9:36 AM


Re: yes, definitely a misunderstanding
If you care about being understood then start caring about making sure you understand others.
Ok, I'll work on it.
By the way, I really enjoyed this, very funny:
Thanks. I apologize for the thread "The Problems with EVC." It never should have been written: it was composed in anger.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by Admin, posted 05-22-2006 9:36 AM Admin has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 242 of 302 (314310)
05-22-2006 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 240 by New Cat's Eye
05-22-2006 10:03 AM


Re: .|.. ^.^ ..|.
I'd like to see a link to where I've typed anything remotely like what it says I said.
You used the phrase "world-class university" in regard to yourself, boastingly.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-22-2006 10:03 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 243 by Faith, posted 05-22-2006 10:18 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 244 of 302 (314314)
05-22-2006 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 243 by Faith
05-22-2006 10:18 AM


Re: .|.. ^.^ ..|.
You are right. My apologies, Catholic Scientist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by Faith, posted 05-22-2006 10:18 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 245 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-22-2006 10:42 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 252 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 05-27-2006 9:34 PM robinrohan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024