Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9181 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: joebialek123
Post Volume: Total: 918,277 Year: 5,534/9,624 Month: 559/323 Week: 56/143 Day: 18/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 168 of 302 (305131)
04-19-2006 1:23 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by Adminnemooseus
04-16-2006 1:44 AM


Re: The "Great Debate" indicators are pretty obvious
I agree with crashfrog about changing the style, or do whatever to make the great debate threads a little more obvious. While I do not participate anywhere nearly as often as crashfrog, I do read a lot on this forum. Because people on one side of the debate grossly overpopulate this forum, I only feel like responding when something really interests me.
http://EvC Forum: How do we know about natural selection? (Igor and Lithodid-Man only) -->EvC Forum: How do we know about natural selection? (Igor and Lithodid-Man only)
That message by igor literally gave me the itch to respond (for obvious reasons).
The point is since I read more than I write, sometimes it's too easy for me to forget which part of the forum I'm reading. In the case of igor's entertaining yet sad post I referenced, the only thing that stopped me from responding was NosyNed's deleted post right after igor's post.
With that said, is there a way at all for those of us not cool enough to be in a great debate to respond someone in one? The itch hasn't gone away.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Adminnemooseus, posted 04-16-2006 1:44 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024