cavediver writes:
.I, for one, am sick of this behaviour - I look at the hours wasted by myself and others in trying to explain the science behind this Universe, as we understand it, and see that effort simply spat back at us.
Thanks for your effort in explaining the universe as you see it.
- 74% Dark Energy we can't feel
- 22% Dark Matter we can't see
- 4% Matter we don't understand.
Great work cavediver, keep it up.
cavediver writes:
Thanks, that's very generous of you. But I notice you're holding back on that omnipotence and omniscience.
Am I?
There's a bag full of O's feel free to use any you think you'll need whilst designing your beings.
cavediver writes:
afraid that with those I might just knock up a creation that would have every living creature falling at my feet?
I'm starting to think it wasn't such a good idea to give you so much power cavediver, now all we have is a stumbling idiot robot with stainless steel fingernails.
LinearAq writes:
..However, I fail to see how this observation of a failed liver and the ability of scientists to find a solution for the problem, constitutes a positive affirmation of the engineering prowess that you attribute to your Designer.
This thread isn't about evidence or affirmation of anything. It's a free-for-all blasphemy thread.
Anyway evidence needs interpretation and you need the wherewithal to interpret evidence.
For example: a filed down pigs tooth can be interpreted by the elite scientific community as evidence enough of common descent. That's because they have the special skills and knowledge necessary to make such a determination. For the rest of us uneducated, uninitiated, it will always be just a pigs tooth.
Rahvin writes:
...For instance, the very first thing I'd do is make separate tubes for eating and breathing so you could never choke while eating ever again.
Or you could try chewing your food before swallowing, that's what your teeth are for. Adding another tube introduces redundancy.
Rahvin writes:
..You don't think this is a bad thing, even though your friend is likely to die.
We're all going to die. What happens then is what is important.
Rahvin writes:
. You don't think the design is flawed. And when your friend receives a replacement, not from your designer but by human science, you actually thank your designer for repairing the faulty part he designed, even though the designer wasn't the one to repair it - human beings replaced it with a new one!
We actually thanked the doctors, nurses, the donor family and other hospital staff.
I never said that the human body was perfect, you're making that up. It fulfills it's purpose. If it didn't have a purpose, it would be nothing but a folly.
Edited by LucyTheApe, : Granny pointed out the fact that I can't add up!
I think I'd prefer it the way it is, I'm just not comfortable with paranoids.
™ Version 4.2
