Who Obfuscates In This Town?

Schraf and Paul, the topic and op of that thread WAS NOT ABOUT SCIENCE. Both then and now, you people are, imo, obfuscating the topics of both threads by this big big deal you're trying to make outa the science matter. Both then and now in this thread you people are, imo, breaking the forum rules by purposefully diverting to that. In post 101 of that thread I conceded that my hypothesis on the science matter was contrary to mainstream science. I posted evidence that I was not alone in this diversion of mainstream science thought. In post 113 of that thread I made another concession and apologized for the thread to owner Percy. I expressed interest in wanting to put it all to rest, but Percy seemed to want to go further. I answered then all the posts that called for a response. I'm not going to get drawn by you people back into that science thing here, so please get over this obfuscative diversion of topic here.Schraf, the clear implication of your charges of obfuscation is that I do it regularly and that I am notorious among all the posters in this tactic. Both then and now all you have to come up with is this one science thing, when in fact Crashfrog first brought it up and I simply made an off the cuff remark about his post. This is blatant obfuscation on your part of the thread topic and of proving the charges you have made for all to read about me. I have shown you madear, to be the obfuscator and you are the one, seemingly, trying to implicate yourself as to being the squeeky clean one. Please get over it and get your nasty claws off my back. Mind you, when you go at me like you do, we'll be back here again to once again set the record straight. I do my best to follow the guidelines here, respect authority here and post with integrity. I do not appreciate this seeming need of yours to malign my reputation as you have been doing. Imo, it's your way of getting back at me for what I post, contrary to your thinking rather than doing the noble thing, which is to refute in fair debate the specifics of my ideology which I post. It's tough enough being the minority view in such a hostle ideological environment without the need to deal with your malignment of character.

Charles, this is what I mean. The heart of the matter boils down to an off the cuff remark I made back in the other thread to Crashfrog. That's it. That's the sole response to specifics I get when opening a thread in defense of the maligning meanspirited stuff Schraf spews out on the www about my character and manner of posting. Her clear implication is that I regularly quit posts prematurely, obfuscate issues and post with bad conduct. Then we go back to this remark I made and you people all rush to that anthill in and attempt to create a mountain out of it. This's futile nonsense, imo.

Thanks Moose. If this kind of response is all they've got I see no purpose in going further with it. If someone wants to address an aspect of it further, I say let them open a thread and have at it.

Does that translate to "Please close the topic now"?If yes, I'll do it.AM

As you know Percy specifically decided to use that issue as a test of your ability to straightforwardly answer questions (message 120). It was not an attempt to move the thread off-topic. And you failed the test. Completely.There is no need to repeat the discussion here, the plain fact of your evasion of the issue is enough. Quite frankly do you really think there is any point starting threads to deny you behave badly when you go on and do the same thing in that very thread ?And let me point out that we are still waiting for even one equally clear example from you of Schraf engaging in the same evasive behaviour that is so typical of you.

To remind you, Obfuscate = confuse, obscure, darken. Posting allegation after allegation with generalized unfounded and undocumented specifics is to confuse, obscure and darken the truth about my posting behavior.YES, MOOSE, THIS IS MY LAST POST FOR THIS THREAD. SINCE NOBODY SEEMS TO CARE ABOUT ANYTHING BUT GENERALIZATIONS, PLEASE CLOSE IT. Thanks.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Closing.Adminnemooseus

---

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to
Change in Moderation?
or
Thread Reopen Requests
or
Considerations of topic promotions from the Proposed New Topics forum

YOu've had specific examples of you engaging in attempts to confuse the issue.You've produced none of Schraf doing so.Just consider the test of your ability to straightforwardly support one of your own assertions in the other thread. First you tried to pretend that you had done so - with vague "evidece" of no clear relevance, then you tried to make excuses as to why you hadn't.Yes close the thread before you embarass yourself further by proving yet again that the criticisms of you were correct - and that your attacks in repsonse were false.