RAZD writes:
Who? I've no idea what you are referring to here. After science movement?
I hope that it does not violate any rules, but I did post below a sampling of the idea of post-science, as it has been dubbed. I believe it is an attempt to come full-circle and start at the beginning of creation via scientific discovery. This post is from another forum that I had visited prior to coming here, out of Bryn Mawr University in PA, and Prof. Chien Yi Lee is a student of Dr.Hugh Ching...
Believing in Jesus: A social scientist is a Son Of God, and a life scientist, a God.
Name: Chien Yi Lee (chien_yi_lee@universalcomputersourcecode.com)
Date: 02/20/2007 17:31
Link to this Comment: 21482
Subject: Believing in Jesus: A social scientist is a Son Of God, and a life scientist, a God.
Post-science would accept with the standard of rigor of the Bible that a perceptive social scientists, who can see the correct way of behavior without analysis, is a Son Of God (or a Messenger Of God), in terms of self-creation. Also, a life scientist, who can program DNA into a living human being, is a God. About quantum effect, being a student of fully trained scientists, I think that mixing quantum with creation or the Bible is the creation of the overly active imagination of science or science fiction writers.
The basic question is whether the assumption of self-creation is correct. Can mankind someday advance its technical know-how to a stage that its life scientists can program DNA to create the living system and can calculate the stability of cosmic systems to recreate a physical universe? Holding the discovery of completely automated software, of which DNA is a prime example, post-science believes that it is possible within the age of the earth, as planned by God, our creators. [CYL]
but I could not help but notice the same goal, if only because it is odd to see this goal coming from two very different sources; a student of the Kabbala, and a Chinese computer scientist.
It will be interesting to see how any YEC proponent could draw a line and say those people are delusional, but their view of a young earth is rational.
LOL, well, I doubt that I can pursue this topic much more without some reading.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
