Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 60 (9208 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,420 Year: 6,677/9,624 Month: 17/238 Week: 17/22 Day: 8/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fundamentalists (of all stripes) at it again (Re: Textbook Wars: Religion in History)
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 181 of 194 (284907)
02-08-2006 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 175 by Buzsaw
02-07-2006 9:28 PM


Re: Does seeking relief under the law=lobbying?
Can we agree that X-ing out/revising religious events and aspects of history is bypassing scholarship in history classes? Case in point: the student in my link citing Martin Luther being depicted solely as a social reformer.
How would this even be possible? If nothing else, the man nailed his reforms to the door of a freakin' church.
I dunno, Buz. I was in high school less than a decade ago, and we learned about Martin Luther in full. We also learned about the formation of the Church of England, and the conversion of Emperor Constantine. (Amongst other Christian-themed topics.)
The reason we learned about these things in history class was because they were major world events. We learned the reasons behind them, and the effect they had on later times. The only thing we weren't taught was religious-philosophy-as-fact. They left that to any churches we may or may not have chosen to attend.
And like I say, this was all in the mid-nineties. Has there been some massive schism in education since 1996 that I blinked and missed?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Buzsaw, posted 02-07-2006 9:28 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17907
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 182 of 194 (284914)
02-08-2006 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 180 by Percy
02-08-2006 10:22 AM


Re: Does seeking relief under the law=lobbying?
I wonder if he meant Martin Luther King, who is more important as a social reformer than a religous leader (something I've never heard about Martin Luther).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Percy, posted 02-08-2006 10:22 AM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-08-2006 11:23 AM PaulK has not replied
 Message 184 by Omnivorous, posted 02-08-2006 11:51 AM PaulK has not replied
 Message 186 by Buzsaw, posted 02-08-2006 12:14 PM PaulK has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 183 of 194 (284920)
02-08-2006 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by PaulK
02-08-2006 11:12 AM


Re: Does seeking relief under the law=lobbying?
I wonder if he meant Martin Luther King
If this is the case, I should also note that we were taught in high school that one of Martin Luther King's main inspirations for his method of protest was the sermon on the mount. Specifically, Matthew 5:38-48.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by PaulK, posted 02-08-2006 11:12 AM PaulK has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member (Idle past 124 days)
Posts: 4001
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005


Message 184 of 194 (284927)
02-08-2006 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 182 by PaulK
02-08-2006 11:12 AM


Marin Luther, Supporter of Feudalism
PaulK writes:
I wonder if he meant Martin Luther King, who is more important as a social reformer than a religous leader (something I've never heard about Martin Luther).
I dunno what he meant, Paul, but Martin Luther was no social reformer, that's for sure. I've read some scholars suggest that he helped create a general climate of reform, but he told the serfs who hoped for a better deal to shut up and obey their lords.
Whatever church reforms he favored, he wanted to maintain the social status quo the Church rested upon.

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by PaulK, posted 02-08-2006 11:12 AM PaulK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by truthlover, posted 02-09-2006 12:57 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 185 of 194 (284928)
02-08-2006 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 180 by Percy
02-08-2006 10:22 AM


Re: Does seeking relief under the law=lobbying?
My apologies. I had intended to post two link exerpts and deciding that that would be too much, used only one. I was going by memory and the quote must have been from the other link which I have not been able to locate.
It appears that rather than significant revisions, perse, the secularization of history has been more of an evolution as society in general has become more secularized. So being a gradual process, it's likely going to be difficult finding specifics but I will continue to research as I find the time.

Gravity is God's glue that holds his universe together.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Percy, posted 02-08-2006 10:22 AM Percy has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 186 of 194 (284935)
02-08-2006 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by PaulK
02-08-2006 11:12 AM


Re: Does seeking relief under the law=lobbying?
Buston U link writes:
Unfortunately, most public schools have been guilty of what can only be called a cowardly avoidance of this aspect of life. For example, one study found that most textbooks never mentioned that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a minister, or that religion played a fundamental role in the Freedom Movement of the 1960s. There was no mention, in discussions of current American society, of evangelist Billy Graham, who has consistently been one of the most popular Americans for the last 30 years, or of the fact that more Americans attend religious services each week than attend professional sports in a year!
http://www.iapche.org/ctc15-2insert.htm
Surely though, they could cite his religious role in life as his vocation/calling since a whole day is set aside in his honor, and then there's Billy Graham mentioned in this study. This link, btw is from a Boston U man.

Gravity is God's glue that holds his universe together.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by PaulK, posted 02-08-2006 11:12 AM PaulK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by Percy, posted 02-08-2006 1:15 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 188 by Omnivorous, posted 02-08-2006 1:41 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22929
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 187 of 194 (284977)
02-08-2006 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by Buzsaw
02-08-2006 12:14 PM


Re: Does seeking relief under the law=lobbying?
The link is from the International Association for the Promotion of Christian Higher Education, not from BU. It contains an article by a Dr. Glenn of Boston University that was presented at Dordt College, which is a Christian college. The article was also supposed to have appeared in the August 2004 issue of Pro Rege, a quarterly publication of Dordt College whose website says, "the purpose of this journal is to proclaim Christ's kingship over the sphere of education."
In other words, saying the link is from BU is misleading because it gives Dr. Glenn's opinions a secular weight they simply do not have. Dr. Glenn's webpage says that he has been an ordained minister since 1963.
In other words, I'm not at all surprised by these words from an ordained minister speaking at a Christian college.
King is usually referred to as the Reverend Martin Luther King, so of course he's a minister. I expect textbooks refer to him the same way. I lived the 60s, as did you, and King's achievements were in civil rights, not religion. He used black church's as organizing centers for his civil rights activities, not as places of worship, not that he didn't give a good sermon. He was a great leader, but his PhD thesis in theology was plagiarized from an earlier thesis.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by Buzsaw, posted 02-08-2006 12:14 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member (Idle past 124 days)
Posts: 4001
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005


Message 188 of 194 (284987)
02-08-2006 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by Buzsaw
02-08-2006 12:14 PM


Textbooks, Controversy, Citations, and Money
There is a great deal of reasonable commentary in the article you linked to, Buz.
For example:
The First Amendment to the Constitution has been interpreted to forbid any level of government”including local public school systems”from engaging in or directly supporting religious practices. But even if that interpretation changed, it’s not at all clear that people for whom religious beliefs are very important would want a government agency deciding how those beliefs would be interpreted and taught. Nor would we want children whose beliefs differ from those of the school forced to choose between violating their consciences and being singled out by asking to be excused. Nor would those for whom prayer is important want to see it trivialized as a way to quiet down a class, as has been suggested by some advocates of “school prayer.”
In short, the American government is required, for very good reasons, to be neutral between various religious beliefs, and also to be neutral between belief and non-belief. Schools operated directly by government must act in ways consistent with that requirement, and so must each of their teachers. They must not seek to promote any particular religious belief, nor may they in any way promote secularism (a way of understanding the world that explicitly rejects any idea of divine purpose or meaning) in preference to religion.
Unfortunately, the author did not cite the study making the claims about U.S. textbooks' handling of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Rev. Billy Graham.
So we are left wondering how many textbooks neglected to mention MLK altogether, and how much coverage (if any) those textbooks devoted to "the Freedom Movement of the 1960s." We cannot even determine when and where the study was done, how many textbooks were examined, etc.
We might reasonably ask if the textbooks describe the history of the evangelical movement without naming any individual; is that an egregious omission? If they did mention Billy Graham, did they mention his infamous role as an anti-Semitic Greek chorus to Nixon?
Based on the antipathy toward MLK that persists among whites, esp. in southern states, I am especially curious about how many textbooks mentioned either man only in passing with few details, or mentioned neither, and how both correlated with region and local political climates. Did they, for example, cover MLK's opposition to the Vietnam War and other U.S. military adventures, or his increasingly sharp questioning of class structure in the U.S.?
Textbooks shy away from controversial figures because they are published by for-profit corporations. Both MLK and Graham were polarizing figures who were both tremendously popular among some, and passionately hated by others. Both men have checkered records, one as an evangelical who echoed some of the worst prejudices of his time, the other as a philandering minister.
If you know where the original study can be found, I would be most interested in reading it.
DISCLAIMER: B.U. alumnus
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 02-08-2006 01:43 PM
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 02-08-2006 01:44 PM

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by Buzsaw, posted 02-08-2006 12:14 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4308 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 189 of 194 (285217)
02-09-2006 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 184 by Omnivorous
02-08-2006 11:51 AM


Re: Marin Luther, Supporter of Feudalism
Martin Luther was no social reformer, that's for sure. I've read some scholars suggest that he helped create a general climate of reform, but he told the serfs who hoped for a better deal to shut up and obey their lords.
Worse than that, when they didn't and instead rose up against the lords, he told the lords they could obtain salvation by spilling the blood of the peasants.
Whatever church reforms he favored, he wanted to maintain the social status quo the Church rested upon.
Actually, I think he may never have thought of any alternative to the status quo. The church and state were married in his day, and he never challenged that. He created a new church, but he left the power to enforce that religion in the power of the lords, and conversion to Lutheranism was from lord to lord, with all the serfs required to follow, not from person to person.
Also, every one of Martin Luther's 95 theses concerned only one Catholic practice, which was indulgences. The book A World Lit Only by Fire makes a pretty good case (IMHO) that Martin Luther's reformation was much more a tax reform than a religious one.
On the other hand, both the religious and governmental effects of that Reformation were immense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by Omnivorous, posted 02-08-2006 11:51 AM Omnivorous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by jar, posted 02-09-2006 1:41 PM truthlover has not replied

  
jar
Member
Posts: 34140
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 190 of 194 (285230)
02-09-2006 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 189 by truthlover
02-09-2006 12:57 PM


Re: Marin Luther, Supporter of Feudalism
Also, every one of Martin Luther's 95 theses concerned only one Catholic practice, which was indulgences.
In addition, the practices of indulgences as well as other issues WERE reformed by the Roman Catholic Church during the Council of Trent. One of the other big issues was related to Absentee Bishops and that was also addressed.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by truthlover, posted 02-09-2006 12:57 PM truthlover has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5148 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 191 of 194 (285379)
02-10-2006 12:26 AM


the Reformation
The Reformation is generally not properly taught at all. First off, the theology driving the debate is not properly taught. Secondly, only 2 sides to a 3-sided debate (actually much more but 3 main divisions of thought) are presented, and the effects of the Reformation are vastly underplayed when compared to the effects of the Enlightenment.
For example, specific beliefs and practices, such as freedom of religion, stemmed from the Reformation and specific people and ideas, and yet are taught as having primarily stemmed from the Enlightenment which is wrong.

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5148 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 192 of 194 (285380)
02-10-2006 12:28 AM
Reply to: Message 179 by nator
02-08-2006 8:39 AM


Re: But Buz...
Timothy McVeigh?
Good grief Schraf, get a grip on yourself. You think McVeigh was a Christian?
You have a lot of very serious misconceptions about life.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by nator, posted 02-08-2006 8:39 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by Percy, posted 02-10-2006 8:48 AM randman has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22929
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 193 of 194 (285444)
02-10-2006 8:48 AM
Reply to: Message 192 by randman
02-10-2006 12:28 AM


Re: But Buz...
randman writes:
Good grief Schraf, get a grip on yourself. You think McVeigh was a Christian?
McVeigh was a self-confessed agnostic who was raised Catholic and accepted last rites administed by a Catholic priest before his death. His motivation for the Oklahoma city bombing was the federal action against the Branch Davidian Christian group in Waco, Texas. I think people will have to decide for themselves whether he was Christian or not.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by randman, posted 02-10-2006 12:28 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by randman, posted 02-10-2006 11:17 AM Percy has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5148 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 194 of 194 (285489)
02-10-2006 11:17 AM
Reply to: Message 193 by Percy
02-10-2006 8:48 AM


Re: But Buz...
good point

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by Percy, posted 02-10-2006 8:48 AM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024