Ken Ham's Creation Museum

Like so many of the Biblical Christian Conmen, Ken Ham is not just hiding behind religion but rather waving religion like a shield.Item one of their FAQ says: Notice the classic threats explicit in there.There is no attempt at education, truth or honesty in Ken's museum. It is straight out Christian Cult of Ignorance indoctrination as a way to get the gullible Christians to pony up dough.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

So how much presented in museums must be considered empirically factual to avoid prosecution iyo? Thousands of us consider stuff in your kind of museum to be unproven and false. Does that mean we should work to shut down secularist oriented museums? Some significant things which have been in highly esteemed museums have been debunked haven't they?

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

What's 'your kind of museum'?_____

---

ArcherAll species are transitional.

Feel free to dispute it in the scientific papers. What you consider it to be has no bearing on what it is: you need to make a case not a complaint. There should be no material that has been previously shown to be fraudulent, false, misrepresentations of reality. (exception would be displays about frauds -- and how they had been uncovered).Paluxy human footprints is a false, not a different interpretation of evidence. Presenting humans as living at the same time as (non-avian) dinosaurs is false. Presenting the earth as less than 4.5 billion years is false. Collecting money in exchange for false information is fraud.That is the difference.In my humble but sometimes arrogant opinion.Enjoy.

---

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

It does not matter what you consider true or false.The facts are that Biblical Creationism is false. That is not a matter of opinion, it is fact.Biblical Christian leaders are simply out there to con money from the Biblical Christian herd.It is an easy and safe way to become rich here in the US.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Ladeeda! You've cited a couple of things you consider fraudulent. You want it closed by govt on that account?

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

It's not empirical fact until empirically proven and you have a lot of work cut out for yourself to achieve that.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

You've been told multiple times that nothing in science is ever proven. That being said the evidence supporting various things like the age of the Earth, the non-existance of the biblical flood etc. has wethered all challenges. It's as close to fact as its going to get, and the people who say otherwise are either lying or deluded.

---

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

Of course it is proven Buz.We have shown time after time how AIG misrepresents facts and misuses radiometric techniques.There is NO question that Biblical Christian leaders are simply liars.For proof simply look at the very quotes posted on AIGs website.But don't worry Buz, they are protected here in the US and as long as you and others in the cult keep sending them money, they will keep right on lying to you.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

The question is Buz,When do you stop lying to children?

---

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

I stand by my statement. "Close to" is relative to your ideology and is not empirical.

well if you want to continue to appear ignorant then by all means go ahead. is "empirical" your new favorite word Buz? cause you keep misusing it. Please explain how the old age of the earth and the non-happening of the biblical flood have not been empirically backed up, if you need to start a new topic in the science fora for it I'll wait.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

---

Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor

Ham believes what he has is authentic and it is not proven otherwise. That is not a bonafide lie.Here is an example of a bonafide proven lie and it was not perpetrated on the kiddies by a Christian Biblicalist creationist for the three decades of it's scientific display and use. This page has moved

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

Jar, your message title is stated as a quote from me so you need to delete it or change it so it does not miss-quote me. You can do that by deleting the name JarAlso stop lying about me. I do not send these folks money. Either change it or delete it.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

That's all you have? That hoary old story? Do we really need to revisit one more time that it was science that uncovered and exposed the fraud, and that NO museum uses it as a case FOR evolution (as much as creationists fraudulently try to portray it)?As opposed to current fraud used by creationists. Doesn't matter what Ken Ham claims to believe: falsehood is falsehood. The age of the earth is a FACT and the earth IS old.What is this? "Look - Piltdown - therefore fraud is okay"?When is is time to stop lying to children?Enjoy.

---

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.