Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Noah's Ark has been found
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 46 of 126 (322481)
06-17-2006 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by nwr
06-17-2006 1:50 AM


Re: Off topic but gotta respond.
For example, He (Jesus) said, 'Scripture cannot be broken'. Which means that Noah's Ark is a true story!
If you could actually give a reference for that, people would be able to examine the context, and then have a better idea as to whether it has any implications for the "Noah's Ark" story.
It would be my pleasure...
John 10:22-38
22 Then came the Feast of Dedication at Jerusalem. It was winter, 23 and Jesus was in the temple area walking in Solomon's Colonnade. 24 The Jews gathered around him, saying, "How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly." 25 Jesus answered, "I did tell you, but you do not believe. The miracles I do in my Father's name speak for me, 26 but you do not believe because you are not my sheep. 27 My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. 28 I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father's hand. 30 I and the Father are one." 31 Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him, 32 but Jesus said to them, "I have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?" 33 "We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God." 34 Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'? 35 If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came--and the Scripture cannot be broken-- 36 what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'? 37 Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does. 38 But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father."
(NIV)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by nwr, posted 06-17-2006 1:50 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by nwr, posted 06-17-2006 10:03 AM Rob has not replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 47 of 126 (322487)
06-17-2006 2:33 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by nwr
06-17-2006 1:50 AM


Re: Off topic but gotta respond.
For example, He said, 'Scripture cannot be broken'. Which means that Noah's Ark is a true story!
According to Jesus...
nwr, I have to confess... When I first became a Christian (apporx 2 yrs ago) and began to fear that much of the bible was true, I still thought that evolution was a fact!
This particular passage troubled me greatly. I tried all kinds of ways to rationalize it away.
The imlications are clear, and as with all things that Jesus said, this one only leaves a man with a black and white decision. He was a master at eliminating double-mindedness.
He forces a fundamentalist decision, and the stakes are the epitome of life and death. Not just relatively in this life, but eternally.
The relavance of Noahs Ark; or, creationism vs. evolution are actually pale in comparison to the greater test of honesty in general within the heart of each man...
Sorry for the prophetic tone, but this isn't a subject we want to get wrong. The impact on humanity; it's past and future, is of the highest magnitude.
All of us should think very carefully. Examining not just the opposition, but our own desparately wicked hearts.
ps. don't forget to analize this bit:EvC Forum: The definition of science: What should it be?
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

Any biters in the stream?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by nwr, posted 06-17-2006 1:50 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by nwr, posted 06-17-2006 10:08 AM Rob has not replied
 Message 55 by rgb, posted 06-17-2006 5:40 PM Rob has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4980 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 48 of 126 (322501)
06-17-2006 5:17 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Rob
06-17-2006 1:10 AM


Forum rule 4
Of course not! After all Jesus was a reasonable guy
This is just your subjective opinion of course.
'Hey whatever makes you happy man!' I can't remember chapter and verse, but I'm sure He said it.
Could you provide a source for this, I am positive that this is wrong.
Some people think He was a fanatic,
Evidence?
even demon posessed.
Evidence?
They pretend that that is why He was crucified.
Who did?
But we all know it was because he got along with everyone and told people what they wanted to hear.
If he got along with everyone then who would have crucified him?
Your logic is a bit strange mate.
And even stranger here:
For example, He said, 'Scripture cannot be broken'. Which means that Noah's Ark is a true story!
It doesn't mean that Noah's Ark is true, all it means is that Jesus was aware of the story.
Anyway, can you provide supporting evidence for your claims, Forum rule 4 asks us to Points should be supported with evidence and/or reasoned argumentation.
You have not supported a single claim.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Rob, posted 06-17-2006 1:10 AM Rob has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 49 of 126 (322502)
06-17-2006 5:30 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Buzsaw
06-17-2006 12:20 AM


Re: Imperial Debunker
Since you claim to be the imperial debunker of it all I would require a GD between you and me. You said you have the archived refutations of everything by you. Produce them in GD opener and we'll have it out, you and me. I'm off to bed now and out of town much of tomorrow, but you can go ahead and produce your stuff.
No buz. I will not hold another Great Debate with you. But if you wish to discuss it in an open thread I am happy to participate, just start a thread.
Edited by jar, : edited to add a copy of buz post.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Buzsaw, posted 06-17-2006 12:20 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Buzsaw, posted 06-17-2006 10:59 PM jar has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4980 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 50 of 126 (322503)
06-17-2006 5:35 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Rob
06-16-2006 11:42 PM


Re: Bob Cornuke and Rob Wyatt Cranksterism
So I will confess that I am a fundamentalist (with an open mind).
There's an oxymoron if ever I saw one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Rob, posted 06-16-2006 11:42 PM Rob has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 51 of 126 (322519)
06-17-2006 10:03 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Rob
06-17-2006 1:57 AM


Re: Off topic but gotta respond.
John 10:22-38 ...
I don't see the relevance to the Noah's Ark story. The quote is talking about the Law, and the Noah story surely was not considered to be law.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Rob, posted 06-17-2006 1:57 AM Rob has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by arachnophilia, posted 06-17-2006 4:18 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 52 of 126 (322520)
06-17-2006 10:08 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Rob
06-17-2006 2:33 AM


Re: Off topic but gotta respond.
nwr, I have to confess... When I first became a Christian (apporx 2 yrs ago) and began to fear that much of the bible was true, I still thought that evolution was a fact!
Indeed evolution is a fact.
If you saw the Noah's Ark story in any book other than the Bible, you would immediately recognize it as a fable. You would readily see it as a story containing a moral lesson, but not a description of actual events that occurred.
What is it about the Bible, that causes some people to abandon all common sense when reading it? God gave us brains. We were meant to use them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Rob, posted 06-17-2006 2:33 AM Rob has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 53 of 126 (322633)
06-17-2006 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by nwr
06-17-2006 10:03 AM


Re: Off topic but gotta respond.
John 10:22-38 ...
I don't see the relevance to the Noah's Ark story. The quote is talking about the Law, and the Noah story surely was not considered to be law.
the verse jesus is quoting is:
quote:
Psa 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
normally, "the law" refers to ha-torah, the first five book of the christian bible (which, btw, includes the noah story). the curious point is that jesus using "law" in a way that no jewish person would: to refer not only the laws, and not only the torah, but the psalms as well. clearly, psalms are NOT laws.
[edit]
also, it's out of context.
quote:
Psa 82:1 [[A Psalm of Asaph.] God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods.
god is not talking to people, he is talking to other gods, NOT MEN. the "congregation" is much like the council that appears in job, yahweh (the most high god) and the lesser gods/sons of god.
quote:
Psa 82:6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
Psa 82:7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.
[/edit]
Edited by arachnophilia, : wrong quote box
Edited by arachnophilia, : added info.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by nwr, posted 06-17-2006 10:03 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by nwr, posted 06-17-2006 6:30 PM arachnophilia has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 54 of 126 (322635)
06-17-2006 4:22 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Rob
06-17-2006 12:44 AM


Re: Bob Cornuke and Rob Wyatt Cranksterism
though, i'd have to say, it'd be unlikely.
The easiest thing to bet on is the skeptical angle, becasue all things are always doubtable...
i have a number of good geological reasons to be HIGHLY skeptical of such a find. not the least of which is the fact that old boats are very, very rare archaeological finds, and tend not to preserve very well.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Rob, posted 06-17-2006 12:44 AM Rob has not replied

  
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 126 (322668)
06-17-2006 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Rob
06-17-2006 2:33 AM


Re: Off topic but gotta respond.
Rob writes
quote:
nwr, I have to confess... When I first became a Christian (apporx 2 yrs ago) and began to fear that much of the bible was true, I still thought that evolution was a fact!
Some time ago, an old man told me that your faith and your brain are like your shoes when you try to walk through life. You need both shoes to not hurt yourself. When used together, your shoes can make you a happy person and will protect you from nasty penetrating debris that fill the ground.
Right now, it seems to me that you only want to use one shoe rather than two. When you believed that evolution was fact, it was your faith at work and no rational thought involved. Now that you doubt evolution and believe that the bible is a science text book, you are still using your faith without any rational thought.
Perhaps it is time to try to use both of your shoes? Remember that for now it doesn't matter which side of the debate you decide to side with. The important thing is you need to filter out all the junk that are floating out there and start questioning the long held beliefs, even those that you hold dear.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Rob, posted 06-17-2006 2:33 AM Rob has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 56 of 126 (322680)
06-17-2006 6:30 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by arachnophilia
06-17-2006 4:18 PM


Re: Off topic but gotta respond.
Thanks for the correction and clarification.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by arachnophilia, posted 06-17-2006 4:18 PM arachnophilia has not replied

  
DP
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 126 (322724)
06-17-2006 8:46 PM


Well the small story they did on Fox News was a complete waste of time. Totally worthless.

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Buzsaw, posted 06-17-2006 10:30 PM DP has replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 58 of 126 (322726)
06-17-2006 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Buzsaw
06-16-2006 8:34 PM


Re: Bob Cornuke and Rob Wyatt Cranksterism
It's not Biblically degrading to Christianity to assume there's archeological evidence out there somewhere of what the Christian Bible claims is it?
Of course it is completly understandable that a person who believes in a literal and inerrant interpretation of the Bible would like to examine any possible evidence. I would like to see any such evidence examined by impartial bodies myself.
What ticks me off is when people manufacture evidence, or even delibrately misinterpret such evidence, in order to make money and not to discover anything remotely resembling the truth. According to my sources this is what is happening here.
I have a problem with dishonestly using any religion to further one's personal greed for money, fame, or power. That's why in another thread, after doing the research, I essentially denounced the milk drinking cow statue miracle as degrading Hinduism. I would do the same for any religion, as I feel that provided one knows the facts, it is a moral imperative.
After being here just a few months, I am certian I am not alone in this opinion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Buzsaw, posted 06-16-2006 8:34 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by rgb, posted 06-17-2006 9:32 PM anglagard has not replied

  
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 126 (322732)
06-17-2006 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by anglagard
06-17-2006 9:13 PM


Re: Bob Cornuke and Rob Wyatt Cranksterism
anglagard writes
quote:
That's why in another thread, after doing the research, I essentially denounced the milk drinking cow statue miracle as degrading Hinduism.
I missed this. What was the explanation for the statues drinking all the milk? Was there an explanation for why the metal ones also drank milk?
The topic in question is Hinduism and Reincarnation. Please go there if you wish to discuss the matter. - Adminnemooseus
Edited by AdminJar, : Not in this thread
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Added link to other topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by anglagard, posted 06-17-2006 9:13 PM anglagard has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 126 (322754)
06-17-2006 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by DP
06-17-2006 8:46 PM


Re: The Kasich Fox News Concensus
Hi DP. Welcome To EvC. I intended to watch the Fox Kasich segment and totally forgot. Would you mind sharing what Kasich's consencus of the story was and what was covered? Thanks.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by DP, posted 06-17-2006 8:46 PM DP has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by DP, posted 06-18-2006 6:26 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024