Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   An amazing story
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5864 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 91 of 123 (276522)
01-06-2006 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Faith
01-06-2006 7:46 PM


Re: Karen Armstrong
Had to get that little jab in didn't you. And what is that contention based on? Nothing but your bias against religion, certainly not on knowing the people personally, to know what of reality they can "handle" or not. Why do people always have to attack others' motives? Argue the argument, leave personalities alone.
True, true... Just my opinion, but it was not necessary to throw out that jab....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 7:46 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 9:48 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 92 of 123 (276530)
01-06-2006 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by robinrohan
01-06-2006 8:49 PM


Re: Karen Armstrong
Some who sacrifice for their beliefs end up loving God more as time goes on. I don't see how her sacrificing for a few years confers any special authority on her.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by robinrohan, posted 01-06-2006 8:49 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by robinrohan, posted 01-07-2006 10:33 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 93 of 123 (276531)
01-06-2006 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-06-2006 9:08 PM


Re: Karen Armstrong
How can you have an opinion based on no knowledge whatever?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 9:08 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 9:54 PM Faith has replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5864 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 94 of 123 (276535)
01-06-2006 9:54 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Faith
01-06-2006 9:48 PM


Re: Karen Armstrong
How can you have an opinion based on no knowledge whatever?
By observation and interpretation of observation.....
In my opinion most people who believe in myths are people who have trouble dealing with reality otherwise. Like I said, just my opinion...
I see it everyday here in America.,,. I mean, give me a break. There are tons of people who don't believe in basic science like evolution, geology, etc... yet have no problems using antibiotics or eating pest-resistant crops. Honestly, IMO a lot of them are crazy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 9:48 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 10:18 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 95 of 123 (276540)
01-06-2006 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-06-2006 9:54 PM


OT jabs n stuff
You've missed all the discussions about that particular piece of nonsense. Ho ho ho, we use science but we deny evolution. Evolution is an explanatory system, it is not science as such. Science is merely misused to support evolution. Just a stupid piece of straw man slander. We have no problem with science. REAL science.
This message has been edited by Faith, 01-06-2006 10:25 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 9:54 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by crashfrog, posted 01-06-2006 10:26 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 97 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 10:30 PM Faith has replied
 Message 107 by nator, posted 01-06-2006 11:42 PM Faith has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 96 of 123 (276542)
01-06-2006 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Faith
01-06-2006 10:18 PM


Re: OT jabs n stuff
Evolution is an explanatory system, it is not science as such.
But that's what science is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 10:18 PM Faith has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5864 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 97 of 123 (276543)
01-06-2006 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Faith
01-06-2006 10:18 PM


SCIENCE
Um, Faith.... Honestly, you might want to just stop now....
Evolution is an explanatory system, it is not science as such.
Hmmm.... so what is science? Oh, I know, let's check Dictionary.com.
The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.
WOW, can you believe it???? Science IS the explanation of phenomena. I tell you, I'm dumbfounded.
Science Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
I love it when people make my point for me.
GO ILLINI!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 10:18 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 10:34 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 98 of 123 (276545)
01-06-2006 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-06-2006 10:30 PM


Re: SCIENCE
When someone resorts to the dictionary to make their case I know they haven't a clue what the conversation is about. Evolution is this gigantic meta-explanation, pure fantasy, into which scientific data is merely crammed. It does not fit it any better than it fits creationism. It's purely a habit of thought. I'm sure you haven't tried to think it through yourself, have you? Few do. You take it on authority or on faith. But if you try, really try to track down a piece of data, say, and understand how it fits evolution, you just find yourself in a morass of imaginative scenarios that have no actual objective support.
This message has been edited by Faith, 01-06-2006 10:36 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 10:30 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by crashfrog, posted 01-06-2006 10:37 PM Faith has replied
 Message 101 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 10:43 PM Faith has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 99 of 123 (276546)
01-06-2006 10:37 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by Faith
01-06-2006 10:34 PM


Re: SCIENCE
Evolution is this gigantic meta-explanation, pure fantasy, into which scientific data is merely crammed.
There's no cramming necessary, and quite frankly, you would know that if you'd ever set foot into a biology classroom.
Let's be honest. Your constant and hilarious biological blunders make it absolutely clear that you have absolutely no basis for concluding what you do.
But if you try, really try to track down a piece of data, say, and understand how it fits evolution, you just find yourself in a morass of imaginative scenarios that have no actual objective support.
Well, let's try it. Open a thread and we'll do just that. Or is this going to be one more of your insupportable claims?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 10:34 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 10:40 PM crashfrog has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 100 of 123 (276548)
01-06-2006 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by crashfrog
01-06-2006 10:37 PM


Re: SCIENCE
It's not something that can be done on a thread it seems to me. I used to try to track all kinds of claims down and the effort leads nowhere. That was before I was a Christian too, when I still took the ToE on faith. I don't have the energy to do all that again. But I wish others would try it for themselves. I don't mean scientists I mean ordinary people, because you have a habitual way of thinking that will prevent you from doing what I'm suggesting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by crashfrog, posted 01-06-2006 10:37 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by crashfrog, posted 01-06-2006 10:51 PM Faith has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5864 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 101 of 123 (276549)
01-06-2006 10:43 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by Faith
01-06-2006 10:34 PM


Re: SCIENCE
When someone resorts to the dictionary to make their case I know they haven't a clue what the conversation is about.
Yes, you are right, looking in the dictionary to find out the definition of a word is definitely a terrible idea. Next time I want to know the definition of a word I'll ask my imaginary friend instead of consulting a refernce book.
Look, if you don't want to believe in evolution; fine. Fortunately for you, drugs tested on chimps will still work, antibiotics will still work, gene therapy will still work, geneticly engineered crops will still feed you. Because it all works faith; whether YOU believe in it or not! That's the GREAT thing about science. It just works without regard to what anyone belives.
To get back on-topic (although, I guess it doesn't matter in the coffee house), I felt bad for the woman in the story because she was so brainwashed that she had a breakdown when she finally experienced reality. And then her church had the audacity to make her choose between dogma and reality. They DEMANDED they she accept INSANE thoughts like the world being 6000 years old. It's no wonder she had such a rough time of it.
Cheers and of course GO ILLINI

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 10:34 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 11:02 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied
 Message 112 by BuckeyeChris, posted 01-07-2006 12:14 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 102 of 123 (276551)
01-06-2006 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Faith
01-06-2006 10:40 PM


Re: SCIENCE
But I wish others would try it for themselves.
I did. Why do you think I stopped being a creationist and became an evolutionist?
I don't mean scientists I mean ordinary people, because you have a habitual way of thinking that will prevent you from doing what I'm suggesting.
Scientists can't be ordinary people? What do you think they are, Martians?
Why do you hate scientists so much, Faith?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 10:40 PM Faith has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5864 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 103 of 123 (276554)
01-06-2006 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-06-2006 10:43 PM


Re: SCIENCE
I don't have the energy to do all that again.
Yet, you have the energy to come on this board and deny basic science without having any understanding of it.
Geez, I only took basic biology in college (being an engineer my focus was much more on physics), and even I can easily see that the evidence for evolution is overwhelming.
I mean, what other explanation is there? Is god a liar and a trickster that planted fossils to test our belief? Again, this is why I enjoyed this woman's story so much. I mean there is only so much ludicrous non-explanation one can listen too.
I just envision a kid in the corner with his hands over his ears yelling "NA NA NA NA NA NA NA... I can't hear you. I can't hear you"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 10:43 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by Faith, posted 01-06-2006 11:37 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 104 of 123 (276558)
01-06-2006 11:33 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by robinrohan
01-06-2006 6:49 AM


Re: Karen Armstrong
quote:
Years later she found out she had epilepsy.
...
combined with:
quote:
And she started having these "religious" experiences in the midst of her studies--religion in a library, so to speak.
Is not uncommon.
Epileptics, particularly temporal lobe epileptics, are known to often be hyper-religious people. I wonder if Armstrong is one of them?
GOD MODULE': Study Ponders: Are Humans Hard-Wired For Religious Bent?
BY ROBERT LEE HOTZ
LOS ANGELES TIMES
excerpt:
People suffering this type of seizure have long reported intense mystical and religious experiences as part of their attacks but also are unusually preoccupied with mystical thoughts between seizures.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by robinrohan, posted 01-06-2006 6:49 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by robinrohan, posted 01-07-2006 10:37 AM nator has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 105 of 123 (276560)
01-06-2006 11:37 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-06-2006 11:02 PM


Re: SCIENCE
You haven't been here very long and have no idea what has been argued and what I've argued. Of course you think you can "see" the evidence for evolution is overwhelming. You've swallowed whole what you've been taught, you never really tried thinking it through for yourself -- because very very few ever do -- and you never tried thinking about it from any other point of view.
The other explanation for the fossils is the worldwide Flood. Check out some of the threads on that. You won't accept the explanation but it isn't "god is a liar and a trickster who planted fossils to test our belief." You've obviously not paid any attention to the creationist argument, so you shouldn't be saying anything whatever about it. The only way that enormous number of fossils could have been made is in a water-soaked environment that happened in a brief period of time. And the layers of the geological column are too neat to have been built up one homogeneous layer at a time over millions of years. It's absurd. Marine fossils in the deserts and in the high mountains? The Flood. All they have is local explanations, but these phenomena are worldwide. Read some of the threads on it. You are raising the entire evo-creo debate off topic on this thread and from a totally uninformed position.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-06-2006 11:02 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by AdminNWR, posted 01-06-2006 11:41 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024