quote:
It doesn't matter what environment you put a person in, they won't live anywhere close to that long.
Rei, the environment would make some difference, but you've reminded me that there would be more.
1. The genes of living things would likely be stronger the nearer creation you get, as Adam was created perfect in every way. There would tend to be a lessening of quality in beings as time went on, imo. This would possibly also be so in the quality of plants. Again, I can't prove that. Just another hypothesis.
2. They were vegetarians and had better quality to eat with the super climate.
quote:
It can't be even remotely a major portion of the flood, or it would have parbroiled everyone alive. And plants... did they evolve to the present diversity of plants that need shade and plants that need sunlight later?
Nobody, (even you, Rei
) would know how much water was in the atmosphere, how high the hills/mountains were, i.e how much water required to cover and how much under ground.
And evidence of exposure of the lithosphere is... where? And this water wouldn't be superheated.... why?
Neither of us were there, so God knows. As I stated, nobody knows how high or dense the vapor would've been, nor the pressure, nor anything else for sure.
When the island of La Palma alone collapses, the tsunami it will release should wipe out the entire eastern coast of the United States. *How much* mass displacement are you proposing?
Ditto, dono.
Sorry - there aren't huge reserves of water under the earth. Try again.
You missunderstood, I meant the canopy falling to earth via flood.
The rest is more hypothesis on both our parts, like your hypothesizing about billions of years ago as to what the universe was exactly like. So here we are, back here at square one. Shall we dance?