Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Michael Savage and Autism
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 33 (477299)
08-01-2008 1:43 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by jamison
07-31-2008 8:29 PM


Re: Hmmm
What are you, 10 years old?
No offense, but your posts suck as far as content is concerned.

By the way, a collage is, like, a bunch of pictures where a college is, like, a bunch schools.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by jamison, posted 07-31-2008 8:29 PM jamison has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 33 (477410)
08-01-2008 9:49 PM


A Savage Response
Savage recently had a professional psychiatrist on who downsized Savage's 90% to about 50% of alleged autism diagnoses as bogus. That's still very significant.
His talk show comes into WYSL, Rochester from my area very poorly and it goes in and out of frequency, so I did't get the whole interview with this professional who he had on. What I heard made good sense to me. Imo, the doc vindicated Savage's point.
As I've contended, Savage is no dummy, though in this case, perhaps he exaggerated the extent of the problem.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by LudoRephaim, posted 08-05-2008 2:00 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
LudoRephaim
Member (Idle past 5084 days)
Posts: 651
From: Jareth's labyrinth
Joined: 03-12-2006


Message 33 of 33 (477637)
08-05-2008 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Buzsaw
08-01-2008 9:49 PM


Re: A Savage Response
Savage recently had a profesional psychiatrist on who downsized savage's 90% to about 50% of alleged autism diagnoses as bogus. That' still very significant.
Only if the Psychiatrist is not a hack or on the fringe (lunatic fringe...?) and his views are backed up by the majority of his peers and the evidence. True, sometimes the minority view of some sciences has some merit (I could name a few, but i dont want this debate to get sidetracked. Can look at the Bigfoot thread though for one, but please all stay on topic), but they actually go by true evidence, and unless this shrink has it (and not something cooked up by Savage and some conservatve thinktank who want people like me locked up in loonry bins or get no help whatsoever)then it is bogus. We need to see a peer reviewed source that backs up this person's claims, one that is not heavily challenged by otghers.
As i've contended, Savage is no dummy, though in this case, perhaps he exaggerated the extent of the problem
What you call an exaggeration, i call a slap in the face.
Edited by LudoRephaim, : No reason given.

"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Buzsaw, posted 08-01-2008 9:49 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024