Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,814 Year: 4,071/9,624 Month: 942/974 Week: 269/286 Day: 30/46 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Religious views of Magic the Gathering--PLEASE HELP!
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 76 of 125 (217793)
06-17-2005 11:34 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Faith
06-17-2005 10:35 PM


quote:
But any kid who did get entangled with demons would be in deep trouble and that's what worries Christian parents.
But they could always take their possessed child to the friendly neighborhood exorcist who could bleed him or maybe perform a trefination to let the demon out, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Faith, posted 06-17-2005 10:35 PM Faith has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3951 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 77 of 125 (217795)
06-17-2005 11:37 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by nator
06-17-2005 11:24 PM


Show me a SINGLE shred of verifiable evidence that there is such a thing as spells, sorcery, or anything at all like that which actually exists and I will denounce MTG immediately after.
Since according to you there is no such thing as angels, archangels, or any other heavenly host either, then a game based on these characters would be ok.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by nator, posted 06-17-2005 11:24 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by nator, posted 06-17-2005 11:44 PM Monk has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 78 of 125 (217796)
06-17-2005 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Monk
06-17-2005 11:37 PM


quote:
Since according to you there is no such thing as angels, archangels, or any other heavenly host either, then a game based on these characters would be ok.
I don't know if such things exist or not.
There is no evidene to suggest they interact in a detetable fashion with the physical world as far as we have been able to tell.
So yes, a game based upon these characters would be fine by me.
...except wouldn't you need demons, devils, and maybe fallen angels as antagonists in such a game?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Monk, posted 06-17-2005 11:37 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Faith, posted 06-18-2005 12:14 AM nator has replied
 Message 83 by Monk, posted 06-18-2005 10:58 AM nator has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 79 of 125 (217802)
06-18-2005 12:10 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by nator
06-17-2005 11:24 PM


But if it doesn't actually flirt with sorcery why would you denounce it just because sorcery is real?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by nator, posted 06-17-2005 11:24 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by nator, posted 06-18-2005 2:50 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 80 of 125 (217803)
06-18-2005 12:14 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by nator
06-17-2005 11:44 PM


I don't know if such things exist or not.
There is no evidene to suggest they interact in a detetable fashion with the physical world as far as we have been able to tell.
There's a ton of evidence in witness reports in all religions and cultures. But I understand, you occupy the superior enlightened position of being able to pronounce all those other human beings deluded.
So yes, a game based upon these characters would be fine by me.
...except wouldn't you need demons, devils, and maybe fallen angels as antagonists in such a game?
Demons, devils and fallen angels are synonymous.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by nator, posted 06-17-2005 11:44 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by nator, posted 06-18-2005 3:02 PM Faith has replied
 Message 91 by crashfrog, posted 06-18-2005 3:47 PM Faith has replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4704 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 81 of 125 (217806)
06-18-2005 1:05 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Faith
06-17-2005 10:37 PM


It doesn't sound like it contains any real dangers of the sort that worry Christians, it's just that the imagery itself suggests those dangers.
That sounds right. I think I understand that well enough to have it help me in any discussion.
Thank you,
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Faith, posted 06-17-2005 10:37 PM Faith has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 82 of 125 (217826)
06-18-2005 8:16 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by Faith
06-17-2005 10:35 PM


But any kid who did get entangled with demons would be in deep trouble and that's what worries Christian parents.
What's the process for getting entagled with demons? I've been trying everything but to no avail. Magic: The Gathering, Dungeons and Dragons, listening to rock music - nothing seems to work.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Faith, posted 06-17-2005 10:35 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by Faith, posted 06-18-2005 1:50 PM crashfrog has replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3951 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 83 of 125 (217846)
06-18-2005 10:58 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by nator
06-17-2005 11:44 PM


So yes, a game based upon these characters would be fine by me.
...except wouldn't you need demons, devils, and maybe fallen angels as antagonists in such a game?
Sure you would need anatagonist such as demons etc. I don't have a problem with that and I'm sure there is a game out there somewhere like this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by nator, posted 06-17-2005 11:44 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by bob_gray, posted 06-18-2005 8:34 PM Monk has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 84 of 125 (217894)
06-18-2005 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by crashfrog
06-18-2005 8:16 AM


What's the process for getting entagled with demons? I've been trying everything but to no avail. Magic: The Gathering, Dungeons and Dragons, listening to rock music - nothing seems to work.
It's possible to be entangled and not know it. However, the process is to believe in and consult oracles or seek supernatural powers. Fortunately you no doubt don't believe in them any more than you believe in God so you're safe. Sort of. I mean if they don't get you that way they'll get you some other way anyway, so in a sense this whole concern with occultic games is a bit academic.
This message has been edited by Faith, 06-18-2005 01:52 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by crashfrog, posted 06-18-2005 8:16 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by crashfrog, posted 06-18-2005 2:05 PM Faith has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 85 of 125 (217900)
06-18-2005 2:05 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by Faith
06-18-2005 1:50 PM


Fortunately you no doubt don't believe in them any more than you believe in God so you're safe.
Woot! Atheism for the win!
I mean if they don't get you that way they'll get you some other way anyway
What the hell is taking so long, then?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by Faith, posted 06-18-2005 1:50 PM Faith has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 86 of 125 (217904)
06-18-2005 2:50 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Faith
06-18-2005 12:10 AM


quote:
But if it doesn't actually flirt with sorcery why would you denounce it just because sorcery is real?
The reason it "doesn't flirt with sorcery" is because there's no such thing as sorcery.
It's just make-believe based upon old legends and mythology.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Faith, posted 06-18-2005 12:10 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Faith, posted 06-18-2005 3:19 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 87 of 125 (217906)
06-18-2005 3:02 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Faith
06-18-2005 12:14 AM


quote:
There's a ton of evidence in witness reports in all religions and cultures.
There's a ton of witness reports of magical or unusual creatures like Nessie, Big Foot, mermaids, space aliens, monkey men, succubi, gods walking among humans, vampires, werewolves, shapechangers, tenuki, woodland spirits, etc. in all cultures, too.
Does that mean they all exist, even though there is no verifiable, reliable evidence that they do?
If I told you that I saw Krishna, or Big Foot, or a vampire, would you just unquestioningly believe me, or would you require a bit more evidence than just my say so?
quote:
But I understand, you occupy the superior enlightened position of being able to pronounce all those other human beings deluded.
...or mistaken, or uneducated, or overly superstitious, most likely.
Don't you hold the position that you yourself occupy the "superior enlightened position of being able to pronounce all...other human beings deluded" when it comes to other religions, and even interpretations of Christianity that is different from yours?
Like I said in the post you are replying to:
I don't know if such things exist or not.
There is no evidence to suggest they interact in a detetable fashion with the physical world as far as we have been able to tell.
Do you have such evidence?
If so, then let's put it to the test and see if it holds up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Faith, posted 06-18-2005 12:14 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Faith, posted 06-18-2005 3:38 PM nator has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 88 of 125 (217909)
06-18-2005 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by nator
06-18-2005 2:50 PM


But if it doesn't actually flirt with sorcery why would you denounce it just because sorcery is real?
==========
The reason it "doesn't flirt with sorcery" is because there's no such thing as sorcery.
It's just make-believe based upon old legends and mythology.
Uh huh, but you've lost track of the sequence here. You were the one who raised the hypothetical that if sorcery WERE real then you'd condemn the game, and I was answering that by saying that even if it were real, if the game doesn't promote it in any way, why condemn it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by nator, posted 06-18-2005 2:50 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by nator, posted 06-18-2005 3:22 PM Faith has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 89 of 125 (217911)
06-18-2005 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by Faith
06-18-2005 3:19 PM


Right, sorry.
Well if sorcery was real, then we could see if the game actually did promote it.
Since we have no idea what sorcery would be like, what effect it would have, what would be required to practice it (does it require inborn talent or can one study to do magic?), we really don't know if the game would be dangerous or not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Faith, posted 06-18-2005 3:19 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 90 of 125 (217913)
06-18-2005 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by nator
06-18-2005 3:02 PM


There's a ton of evidence in witness reports in all religions and cultures.
====
There's a ton of witness reports of magical or unusual creatures like Nessie, Big Foot, mermaids, space aliens, monkey men, succubi, gods walking among humans, vampires, werewolves, shapechangers, tenuki, woodland spirits, etc. in all cultures, too.
Yes, and though some are no doubt overimagination, they are all part of the evidence that there is a normally-unseen world that in my opinion nobody has a right to dismiss as a delusion simply because it's the prejudice these days that such things don't exist.
Does that mean they all exist, even though there is no verifiable, reliable evidence that they do?
It's all witness evidence and some is better than others and whether it's reliable or not is a very complex judgment call that takes quite a bit of thought.
If I told you that I saw Krishna, or Big Foot, or a vampire, would you just unquestioningly believe me, or would you require a bit more evidence than just my say so?
Certainly I'd need more evidence but I wouldn't expect there to be evidence beyond your own experience. I'd need to interview you to determine if I believed you or not, though in any case I'm not likely to believe that the specifics of an apparition are true (Krishna, Mary, etc), as I believe demons manifest in various forms and rarely appear as themselves. And if you with your prejudices said such a thing in a serious way -- not at EvC where I'd know it was a put-on -- I might be inclined to take it seriously, but I wouldn't believe or disbelieve it without knowing quite a bit about it.
But I understand, you occupy the superior enlightened position of being able to pronounce all those other human beings deluded.
=====
...or mistaken, or uneducated, or overly superstitious, most likely.
Whatever, they're wrong, you're right, about their own personal experiences.
Don't you hold the position that you yourself occupy the "superior enlightened position of being able to pronounce all...other human beings deluded" when it comes to other religions, and even interpretations of Christianity that is different from yours?
Not about anybody's personal experiences. I tend to believe it's presumptuous and rude to question what people say about their personal experience without a GREAT deal of reason to doubt it, but belief systems are something else. That involves a completely objective judgment based on the doctrinal claims of the respective belief systems.
Like I said in the post you are replying to:
I don't know if such things exist or not.
There is no evidence to suggest they interact in a detetable fashion with the physical world as far as we have been able to tell.
Do you have such evidence? If so, then let's put it to the test and see if it holds up.
Like I said in response, the evidence is witness evidence. That kind of evidence requires a different kind of testing than physical evidence does. It involves judgment of many clues to credibility or the lack of it. Not all questions can be tested in a science laboratory.
This message has been edited by Faith, 06-18-2005 03:39 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by nator, posted 06-18-2005 3:02 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by crashfrog, posted 06-18-2005 3:53 PM Faith has replied
 Message 93 by Michael, posted 06-18-2005 6:56 PM Faith has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024