REsultsThe "entities" (that will assist in relimiting any difference of series and sequence (as to changes within) will result from Monod's "death". The specification being a means to judge, the selection regression of the non-life chemical equilbrium -PER STATIC temperature graphics - of the function presumed philosophically or better math (of real numbers with a rational substraction Russell couldn't find marginalized by Cantor purely). We will be able to do away with "asthetic judgment" by mature c/e postings. And this is why I did not think that Symasu was deadon with complexity and "valuejudgements". The illusion Mr Hambre knows too well.
The question we will be priveledged to answer in Monod's delimitation can be, "Is the functionality prohibited by the states" (that Gladyshev used).
"THERMOPHENES OF WING SIZE
The thermophene of wing size, whether measured as length or as area, is given by the first derivative of the function relating wing size to temperature-
dy/dt=yr
Its value is negative for the genetic combinations studied except for vestigial. It is held that the thermophene for purposes of studying genic action serves as a more adequate characterization of the genetic differences than the original phenotypic measurements. It also allows in cases where reciprocal heterozygotes differ and where consequently it seems that a cytoplasmic factor affecting the phenotypic quantity must be postulated - it allow for estimating the action of the cytoplasmic factor in terms of genic action referred to the phenotypic effects of the controlled genes."(Z)
We will not say this activity IS the Gladhyshev law until futher details until we can be certain to be able to identify IN THE FLY Georgi cited, the mature individual's removal, of cells,-say. Regardless there is ground both to combine Gladhsv's consideration of Mendel and decelleration of biological change AND Monod's as to this "control"/regulation etc.
SO WE DO NEED TO KNOW HOW TO FIGURE OUT WHICH bonds come first vs which are strongest, without having to sufficiently rely only on atomic nuclear heirarchies else biology will likely fail the IT transformation of economics and yet again another generation will fail to pick up these suggestions due to the research universities failure to unify NOT because of lack of research but for political reasons that might or might not be attached to Monod. They are not Russian.
The final consideration will be data seperation of effects of the scaled relations within an alleomorph series and between mutiple genes across categories of alleomorphs. This will cause the
t^(m)//t^(im)//t^(organell)//t^(org)//t^(pop)//t^(soc)
to become better defined in the ontogeny and phylogeny of the INDIVIDUAL FLIES used and (thus) sets an error, on the inequalities equal to that-of- when the lifetime of a population (of the flies) can live longer than the species itself (as to equilibria of reverse info flow and deductive forward process(es)) from the soma set by the genic action under reserved discussion by Monod as modified by my own rendering of Stan's "30. Two hypotheses are presented to account fro the action of the vestigial gene, one being based upon the production of an inhibitor and theother upon a deficiency phenomenon, the latter being favored, because it is more in accord with known phenomena."p494.
You might notice that Monod might have gotton THE SAME IDEA from ONE HYPOTHESIS and that would possibly be why he felt he did not need to cite this paper. Perhaps he has somewhere. I never looked. You see this is textual and yet the grammetology is not investigated.
Monod had said BOTH, "One could not even have begun to think seriously about the genetic code until it had been revealed, to begin with, that a protein is beyond the shadow of a doubt a polypeptide in which the amino acid residues really are arranged in a definite, constant, genetically determined sequence - and yet a sequence with no rule by which it determined itself" & "But Sanger's discovery, since it revealed a sequence that had no rule, where-"
and yet the TWO hypothesis of Stan might provide a DIFFERENT RULE than restricting the information by the code we currently discuss.
By so doing, if we succeed in haveing one logically plyed series of sequential orderings then we will have been able to USE phenomenological thermodynmics to RESPOND to Salthe's "instead... a vaguely hierarhic veiw...by...need to make visual representaions" with a HUMAN one which if furthered macromodynmaically will be able to handle the visual "need" by sorting the sequences (and changes in them) among stationary and nonstationary spontaneous vs nonspogenatous systems of processed entites in the exaple of independent external"" variable (inside of Gould).
Stan's statement came from his FIRST paper, not his more lengthy second.
"Experiments were begun in 1927. The writer's brief abstract which appeared in 1928 did not include a consideration of the so-called "critical temperature" for wing length. It was merely stated that the length of vestigial wing varies directly with the temperature, though not in direct proportion, and that there is a distinct sexual dimorphism which is not consistently in one direction at all temperatures but is dependent upon specific temperatures."
not Slathe 3 fold correlation as I, Brad Steven McFall, object from ("
Of course, it might be objected that in vivo this function is really spread throughout the cell while after death there remains a residual function in these so-called mitochondria. What we do now is to line up three justifications for our procedure (1) We use the principle of parsimony...(2) we use the principle of robustness...(3)we will...." as Slathe had just wrote, "Thus we can correlate function with our little vesicles..."p15. This would have to have been Herbert's "new" thing in Salthe's reason (which I objected to) and furthermore anyway Salth-he is agaisnt biological determinism.YOU may feel free to discuss this inter alia niche contrusction of cellular automata. I am not interested in that as of yet. I am not interested because Cornell could only RENAME stan's "straggler" with a label :unknown: causing me to be diagnosed without any realizing that this species was not man but only a fly. Perhaps Dobshanky's Christianity fluff nuttered the profs. I dont know.
PNAS "The pairing regions are presented in a fashion that stresses the order in which they are synthesized. The first region that may pair, necessarily at the 5'end of the leader, are placed on the top line. The second regions that may pair (assuming no interference from prceding pairing regions) are identified on the second line, and so on. The bottom line depicts the termintor region pairing region, always at the 3' terminus of the leader. Because in jmany cases pairing...Therefore we belive the important consideration is which paring region forms first and not which pariting region is strongest"p435
The reason we do not follow the logical ramifications anywhere is becuase of what Campell noted for the dimensional analysis of temperature.
"Temperature is the magnitude with which all those who have discussed dimensions find it most difficult to deal. A total neglect of these difficulties mught suggest doubsts of the complete adequecy of the exposition of dinealns offered here; accordingly, since at least one other volume of this treatise will have to be written before we are in a position to deal in detail with thermal conceptions (which present some of the most interesting probelmes in the principles of science) it may be well to offer a few remarks on that matter."
After an clear statistical thermodynamics were given of the thermostatic by CONTROLED flux volumes were continually defined we would be able to move on and decide if indeed this permits the descent from the peak but still we would need to have Provine's assertaion of wright "incomprehensibility" which Gould and by association I assume Lewotin all held to inside academia. That was there mistake, not ours. OUrs is only using more words were less still might not be better.
You see you need to compare all of my Grandfather's paper to Judson's INABILITY to comprehend Yudkins chemical dynamic equilibrium, the view it appears Monod was working from. Can not the "two-step" growth curves possibly give only ONE hypothesis of Stan's as to the sigmoid nature of the variation in length with temperature effects on DEVELOPEMTAL PERIOD and in Monod's case of lactose ( a Willard F. Stanley 'deficiency phenomena') the kinetic TIME gets the other inhinbitory governance. Monod might have simply USED the temporal asymmetry in two hypotheses for the same materialism by grammetically bUT NOT LEXICALLY extending the ploted data (of TWO DIFFERENT SMALL MOLECULES $While Stan only had found relevance of Arrehnius's work$) and if so might be partially to blame should accelearted drug discovery and Watson's feeling fail Wall Street.
I give you this INNATELY
as to Lerner's "co-adpatation"but
the elites only by coupled relations or are left undefined.
It is Very important industrially to figure out not if I am disabled but if pharmaseutical industry has us all Short Sheeted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Macrothermodynamics provides the means to lexically extend this information if called for while Monod ONLY had via the equilibrium what "would swing the percurso over to making the enzyme in quantity."Judsonp354. We do not know if this is the playground of known electron orbitals or the nanotechnological control via DNA computers. We do not want to learn 100yrs from nowby recovery of some electronic scraped internet recordsthat I was correct but left in the obscurity of all biologists who came after thier biological grandfathers.
This is the "new experience" we have on the net. It is not a veiledphillosophical rejection of the thing in itself. Inside and outside can be futher inverted on my view but not on theirs
This has to be consonant with some formation in group selection however to apriori work. Of course there is not stopping us going and getting the data sans theory.It would be a tough sell to make the "acquired fund" be either/or US eugenics+- the IQ controversy but I believe that this could be done by a humanities department sensitive to the SPACE of Walllace's "Everything and More A Compact History of &(infinity sign)".
We will have found a way to do by this time, "So, far discussion of expected selection responses from the quantitive point of veiw has been limited to mass selection. Considerably more complex forms of selection are possible in plant and animal breeding pratice. The choice of the most efficient method in any given situation is then a major problem. Breeders have long been acquainted with selection procedures based on attempts to evaluate a genotype in ways other than from the individual;s own phenotype. But the possiblity of arriving at a rational even inf notnecessarily the best, decsion in choosing between various options available was opened only after the techinques for estimating selection accrurcy (the regression of the genetic value on the criterion of selectgion) were developed."p153
CoNclusionsWhat is NOT NEW is the states of folding and unfolding. Cantor had asserted a painting and a muics score might have the same cardinal power of an infinite number that Aristotle IN THE SAME FORM would have rejected. I found that the state transitions of Georgi ARE this infinite or a better defintion of the continuum given bioloigcal metric traits that might cross loci or be multiple alleles no matter the stabilizing selection. Regardless, the follwing applied, "Evolutionary models with gaps We turn now to the problem of allowing gaps in the alignment of the leaf sequence. Gaps can be crudely introduced by treating '-' as an extra character in the alphabet of K residues and replacing the KxK -sized substitution matrix for residues with a (K+1) x (K+1)-sized matric that includes the gap character. This has the usual fault of making gaps at adjcent sites independent, and therefore not allowing for the tendecy for gaps to occur in blocks."
The gap expresses BOTH the (chr
omosome) bloc
k or the group selection affect.
In effect our synthesis provides that THERE IS NOT NECESSARILY A FAULT HERE!!!!! The creationist can come to this point but the evolutionist is still trying to count the angels on the pinhead without. Be clear and watch out. The word " block" is unfortunately 'polyvocal' here. One needs a further writing on Simpson to clear that possible confusion of. I was not confused. If you trust me you need not worry about this at all unless you really think that Wolfram can NOT sophisticatedly reduce universality in the matter analyzed here. If he succeeds he will have gotten a better defintion of artifical and natural selection and we would be grateful for that no matter what. I dont think he could put the hat on however.
WE find that death might indeed invert the relative weighting of strength even if not first and that macrothermodynamics might speficy the genic activity that continually maps this conclusion onto descriptive biological form-made. In particular by focusing on a particular entomolgical clade it seems possible that heat shock proteins provide the dynamics this kinematic LAYER makes without absolute kinetic information. This might be approached with the probalistic models of proteins and nucleic acids by a lot of computer power but I think at first that attempting to specify the parameters of chromotagraphic collum thermostat surround will lead to more ascertainable restults in real time.
We now attempt to update Salthe's condiseration interms of Kantian reason that Russel perceptively kept in a geodesic which will be denied by this fact of nondescriptive biology. Specifically Russel's seperatuion of ontology and epsitemology will be inadequate IN ANSWERING the question provided by phenomenolgoical thermo as to if the functionality is prohibited by the states. If the states are inhibited in this manner the subtraction of a rational from a bounded region of reals will project beyond the space. But I will try to express this interms of Calclus as you requested so that instead of simply finishing this paper with the relevant population genetics I will have to address issues of powers of contiguity no matter the Simpsonian ecospace. If necessary
as to continuing arguments with creationists over what Agassiz showed was a inference from a lack wrongly by early Darwinians
we will have to return to Russellp252 "In this passage, the remark: "There is that which goes before, and that which follows; there is distance or interval," if considered as an inference , is a non sequitur; the mere fact of order does not proove that there is distance or interval. It proves, as we have seen that tehre are streches,..."
Continuing then, Druverp240 "Although but a few studies have been made with respect to a quantitative estimation of the changes in a character over the range of a variable, yet the studies which have been made with reference to temperature indicate that there are several classe, as brought out in thefollwing disucssion....The same thing no doubt applies to the case of absolute cell constancy - about which, however, there seems to be some uncertainity- but if absolute cell constancy is an actual phenomenon, then here also the thermophene would be zero."p241
in order to be able seperate the effects IN ORDER I suggest using heat shock protein concentration as the domain of variation and look at the contributions to changes in the value due to "docking" on DNA vs entailment with OTHER proteins WITHIN the principle of substance stability. If idea of distance is accurate to Sathe's vesicualtion the error of not using a strech can be conceptually provided for in the spontateous vs nonspontaneous process of macrokinetics. It would only remain to be explained why Lewontin never saw this tail coming or if he did why he did not try to get ALL biologists to work on the INHERENT point sets molecularly. There is a very very very small amount of uncertainity here and to discriminate against creationists by preventing scholars of evolution to graduate by insisting on a psychological resolution is beyond credibility despite the fact that US Courts continue to perpetuate the appearence of UNIVERSITIES acting like psychiatric doctors and thus grading arbitarily the work of these students whoDO NOT HAVE TO TAKE ANY PSYCHOLOGY to graduate!!!!!!!!!!!!
We are led then to Georgi's symbolism for folded and unfolded states and the question if the functionality of the continuous mappings are PROHIBITED by the states that Monod noticed were freed in the limit of maximal selection. If heat shockproteins are sided in this regard it is possible that the inhibition BOTH he and Stan discussed were but a kinematic layer transition across a dielectric time event only and that states of protein folding not only affect other protein concentrations directly ( in the sense of regulation and control) but that PRIOR states of unfolding and folding as witnessed in linear chains rates of substitutions prevent this from functioning such that there IS PROHIBITION BY THE STATES.
Descripting these states is the last step before fullfilling the answer to the first question after the prior empirical sentence as to a "new" equilibrated set of macrokinetics. It is likely that some new kinds of sophisticated "code" manipulations will be needed. This is not a matter "breaking" a code but rather like Gamow did simplistically on a more elaborate scheme of macrothermodynamic sequences substituting the gaps with looping REALITIES of phenomenological thermodynmics. Certainly Faraday's ideas on thermal currents would greatly lessen this task if found to be adherent to the thermostat surrounding the motion that to a soul still could be conspiring nonethless. This reasoning can now be continued with absolute organism constancy and so I have answered snwk's query as to whose death or only chemical death we had be taklking on.
We approach instead the old equilibrium yet at Lerner's "In other words the explanations centering on selection which are currently invoked to explain the maintenance of variability is small populations are not complete. Itg may be that factors as yet unknown enter the picture or that the present interperetations of empirical evidence are in error or that our models are not valid. As of yet it cannot be decided which of these possibilites is the most probable one since of the factors already known, many (e.g. pleiotropy) have not been fully explored."
Snk if this is too much BS(M) I suggest you go back and answer my question directly or do some more reading of the primary literature than merely responding to me out of a sense of lack of sense. There may be a real difference in undertanding between you and mere over the sense perception that is best left to behaviorists than ecologists until the online environment is up to EVC standards AS A WHOLE. This means that just becaus a bunch of posters moved over onto other threads does not mean they were correct when they did so. If you seek instead for instance to explore organism constancy under sexual selection for example you will have the ability to discuss the philosophy of biology with the best and you dont need me as a sparing partner. The point in response to you is that the temperature life data might indicate that there are other circuits not even the Politics of Monod could connect. If such is the case Monod would be wrong actually even if he did not take a notion directly from Stan or Stan's "straglers"/hangers on. Much involves the SEPERATE notion of sex factors and if the continutiy is found seperately the issue lingering from the 30s can outstrip any change brought by the 60s wrongly by a generation a bit out of space. It was my brother's work that opened this place back up despite the older ability to find it on the phone. You had to think & talk now one simply has to turn a computer switch on. There is more to it than that even if digitally many only want that convience.
How this could be overshadowed by money is beyond me. The story of heat shock chaperon's "employedto stop daughters of upper class families from getting entangled in interactions considered inappropriate" as spelled in by Gross may be a sign that the thinking is still too elite for rather than taking this a clue and cue to "a new biological principle" Gross insisted with Anfinsen that "the sequence of a protein contains the complete information required for the formation of its three-dimensional strucutre."pages67-8 This all depends on if the gap blocks are really independent or not and not whether I committed adultry or not. It is sad that I am having to write the reading with my life when my eyes can follow the words without an magnifier. But I close this keeping to the question of why Monod's death, that's why- so that no other "daughter" need disappear nor become kissed to quantum entaglement. Last semester I couldnt inform the students at and around Cornell that they were being the taught the wrong dynamics and with the new builidings it is likely I will fail explaining what level they are really on. Ithaca is not a penthouse of NYC.
(Z) Hersh, Amos Henry, and Ester Ward 1932. The effect of temperature on wing size in reciprocal heterzygotes in
Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Zool., v. 61, no. 2, Feb 5.
R.Dubin, S. Eddy, A. Krogh, G. Mitchison 1998 Biological sequence analysis Probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids Cambridge University Press
Elizabeth B. Keller and Joseph M.Calvo 1979 Alternative secondary structures of leader RNAs and the regulation of the
trp, phe, his, thr and
leu operons Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA Vol 76. No. 12. pp6186-6190, December
IM Lerner 1961 The Genetic Basis of Selection
(Y) Thermodynamics of Biological Evolution and Aging G.P.GLADYSHEV 2002 Adv, Geront
The Eigth Day of Creation Makers of the Revolution in Biology Horace Freeland Judson Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1996
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 08-29-2004 11:30 AM
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 08-30-2004 06:03 PM
™ Version 4.2
