EvC Forum: On the ethics of debate

robinrohan

Inactive Member

Message 23 of 48 (270778)
12-19-2005 1:46 PM

Reply to: Message 21 by Faith
12-19-2005 11:37 AM

Re: A Tedious Pattern -- indeed it is

Completely off topic, Robin mentioned my "execrable" science and a book he is reading about evolution, and that inspired me to suggest, off topic of course, that he investigate the ToE in a particular manner.

I don't remember this. What "particular manner"?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 21 by Faith, posted 12-19-2005 11:37 AM		Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 24 by Faith, posted 12-19-2005 1:58 PM		robinrohan has replied

robinrohan

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 27 of 48 (270803)
12-19-2005 2:53 PM

Reply to: Message 26 by Faith
12-19-2005 2:41 PM

Re: A Tedious Pattern -- indeed it is

OK, Faith, I'm off-topic here as usual. But what I find so convincing is how the DNA analysis of living beings backs up what was said long ago about the evolutionary family tree. They said that before there ever was DNA analysis.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 26 by Faith, posted 12-19-2005 2:41 PM		Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 28 by Faith, posted 12-19-2005 2:56 PM		robinrohan has replied

robinrohan

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 31 of 48 (270818)
12-19-2005 3:24 PM

Reply to: Message 30 by Faith
12-19-2005 3:20 PM

Re: A Tedious Pattern -- indeed it is

Humm . . .

Maybe we should have a topic where I give my (very limited) understanding of TOE and its proofs, and then you tell me what you think is wrong with what I said.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 30 by Faith, posted 12-19-2005 3:20 PM		Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 32 by Faith, posted 12-19-2005 3:38 PM		robinrohan has replied

robinrohan

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 36 of 48 (270849)
12-19-2005 4:29 PM

Reply to: Message 35 by Faith
12-19-2005 4:14 PM

Re: not so great debate perhaps

But how about a Mediocre Discussion instead of great debate, in which both parties of execrable science (or is yours less so?) aim to understand things better and perhaps invite in expert testimony from time to time? I mean I really would like to understand the genetics better but not the way it usually goes here.

Good idea. I'll compose a PNT.

This message has been edited by robinrohan, 12-19-2005 03:30 PM

This message is a reply to:
	Message 35 by Faith, posted 12-19-2005 4:14 PM		Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 37 by AdminNWR, posted 12-19-2005 4:33 PM	robinrohan has not replied
	Message 38 by bkelly, posted 12-19-2005 5:39 PM	robinrohan has replied

2 online now:	Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), nwr
Newest Member:	Cifa.ac
Post Volume:	Total: 920,080 Year: 402/6,935 Month: 402/275 Week: 119/159 Day: 30/31 Hour: 0/1