quote:
It is not through any "degeneration" that we don't put as much stock in eyewitness accounts as we used to, but because science has increased our understanding.
Unfortunately since the various authors in the Bible weren't necessarily the eye-witnesses, and the information was relayed to them, the stories lose credibility as more time passes. Especially since we know more about how the memory works.
Here is an example of immediate relay of an eye-witness account:
I personally witnessed a girl jump off a bridge. I immediately called 911. When the police came to the bridge after picking her up downstream, I told them what I saw. A news reporter was also there.
Now my mother, my daughter, and I were the only people to see the girl jump. No one else was on the bridge.
I told the police, with the reporter listening, that she jumped and showed them where she jumped from.
Later that night on the evening news they reported that witnesses saw the girl walking along the bridge and saw her fall into the river. A reporter (not the one that was listening in while I was talking) walked along the bridge for the camera so the audience could visualize. The morning paper also reported that witnesses saw the girl fall into the river after walking along the edge.
I checked with the police and we were the only three witnesses. Now the jumper may have told them another story, but they should not have attributed their info to witnesses.
I have had stories written about me or my family in newspapers several times and they usually mess up the facts or didn't understand what was said.
Even this simple straight forward eye-witness account didn't make it to print accurately.
A gentle answer turns away wrath, But a harsh word stirs up anger.