Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   So difficult to keep up! (Re: Memeber of the religious right running morally amuck)
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 136 of 221 (428180)
10-15-2007 5:24 AM
Reply to: Message 132 by molbiogirl
10-14-2007 10:34 PM


Re: inherited vs polygenetic homosexuality
Did the chimps go lesbo?
Huh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by molbiogirl, posted 10-14-2007 10:34 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 11:59 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 137 of 221 (428183)
10-15-2007 5:52 AM
Reply to: Message 130 by Rrhain
10-14-2007 8:05 PM


Re: A quibble
Thanks, Rrhain. I've altered Wikipedia's article on Anal Sex accordingly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Rrhain, posted 10-14-2007 8:05 PM Rrhain has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 138 of 221 (428184)
10-15-2007 5:55 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by molbiogirl
10-14-2007 10:38 PM


Re: With the quibbling again...
Turners. Kleinfelters.
Again, huh? Are these authors of studies, what?
quote:
But, point taken.
It's probably polygenetic. Epistatic. Some such.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying it is partly genetic and partly not, like other behaviours such as alcoholism, organisational skills and intelligence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by molbiogirl, posted 10-14-2007 10:38 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 11:56 AM Dr Jack has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 139 of 221 (428212)
10-15-2007 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Dr Jack
10-15-2007 5:55 AM


Re: With the quibbling again...
Again, huh? Are these authors of studies, what?
Sorry. Thought you would recognize the names.
Kleinfelters and Turners are chromosomal abnormalities.
XXY and X0, respectively.
"Sex" is not very clear cut.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying it is partly genetic and partly not, like other behaviours such as alcoholism, organisational skills and intelligence.
Actually, IQ is thought to be polygenetic as well. Tho that is hotly contested.
And I hardly think "organizational skills" even begin to compare to sexual orientation.
I would agree that sexual orientation is a combination of both genetic and environmental influences; however, the emphasis is heavily on the genetic.
The environmental influence that is most likely to affect sexual orientation is intrauterine biochemistry.
I mentioned it earlier, but I think it bears repeating.
Heterosexuals don't claim to "choose" their orientation, nor do they claim to have been influenced by environmental factors.
While it very well may be the case that a particular person chooses intimacy with a member of the same sex due to ugly experiences with the opposite sex, the vast majority of folks just "are" homo or het.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Dr Jack, posted 10-15-2007 5:55 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Dr Jack, posted 10-15-2007 2:48 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 140 of 221 (428213)
10-15-2007 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by Dr Jack
10-15-2007 5:24 AM


Re: inherited vs polygenetic homosexuality
Brenna contends that abuse (in this case sex abuse) influences sexual orientation.
That was NJ's point as well. That homosexual men were raped as children. Got 'em hooked on the c***, I suppose. Warped their little minds.
So. Again.
Do the chimp victims of gang rape turn lesbo?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Dr Jack, posted 10-15-2007 5:24 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2007 12:07 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 141 of 221 (428215)
10-15-2007 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by molbiogirl
10-15-2007 11:59 AM


Re: inherited vs polygenetic homosexuality
no. i contended that our experiences help shape our activities and behaviors by shaping how our minds work. this includes positive experiences as well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 11:59 AM molbiogirl has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 142 of 221 (428222)
10-15-2007 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by molbiogirl
10-15-2007 11:56 AM


Re: With the quibbling again...
Kleinfelters and Turners are chromosomal abnormalities.
"Sex" is not very clear cut.
Ah, yes. Sorry, I should have done really.
That wasn't really my point though, what I mean is that XX = female is a very simple, straightforward genetic link. You have two XX chromosones, you're a woman; XY, you're a man - there's no environmental influence here.
I would agree that sexual orientation is a combination of both genetic and environmental influences; however, the emphasis is heavily on the genetic.
The environmental influence that is most likely to affect sexual orientation is intrauterine biochemistry.
According to various studies referenced on Wikipedia inherited factors contribute between 0% and 60%. It's worth noting also that in Twin studies both should have had very similar intauterine biochemistry.
Heterosexuals don't claim to "choose" their orientation, nor do they claim to have been influenced by environmental factors.
While it very well may be the case that a particular person chooses intimacy with a member of the same sex due to ugly experiences with the opposite sex, the vast majority of folks just "are" homo or het.
Woah, there. I didn't say anything about 'ugly experiences', I'm not suggesting that orientation is determined in such crude ways. I also don't think people's suggestions of 'why' they are one thing or another can be relied on to any great degree.
I don't think that the simplistic Choice/Born dichotomy actually describes how or why people end up with the personality traits they have.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 11:56 AM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 10:32 PM Dr Jack has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 143 of 221 (428225)
10-15-2007 3:00 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Hyroglyphx
10-13-2007 9:40 PM


Re: Conservative Blogs tell a different story
Its not normal to want to indulge in anal sex.
quote:
I don't think it is either, but in order to be persuasive to an irreligious group you can't give moral reasons because their version of morality is so flexible that it can justify what ever it desires.
Is it normal to want to engage in oral sex?
Is it natural for a woman to want to engage in sex at all?
quote:
What once naturally repulsed people has now become more acceptable through desensitization and over-exposure to such practices.
The idea that women could, and even should, actually enjoy sex "naturally" repulsed people. "Wanton" women were considered disgusting, morally bankrupt, a dangerous influence, and unfit mothers.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-13-2007 9:40 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-16-2007 7:05 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 144 of 221 (428226)
10-15-2007 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Hyroglyphx
10-14-2007 3:06 AM


Re: Conservative Blogs tell a different story
But less so than the mouth. And yet, nobody really seems to think that oral sex is unnatural.
quote:
Yes, but with fellatio no one is vigorously moving so that cuts would occur.
Er, Juggs?
What about the teeth?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-14-2007 3:06 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 145 of 221 (428230)
10-15-2007 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Hyroglyphx
10-14-2007 3:06 AM


Re: Conservative Blogs tell a different story
quote:
Vaginitis or urinary infections can be caused by multiple things. (Especially since a penis doesn't go inside the urethra.
What, you've never heard the term "Honeymoon Disease"?
What that term refers to is the very prevalent occurence in women to get numerous, frequent UTI's after a sudden increase in sexual activity.
I got three of them in the first two months of my marriage, with the third leading to a nasty, painful kidney infection.
Happens to lots and lots of women.
Funny how you don't call that "Straight Women's Nympho Disease" or something perjorative.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-14-2007 3:06 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 10:38 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 146 of 221 (428231)
10-15-2007 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by macaroniandcheese
10-14-2007 7:41 PM


Re: Sex abuse v. rape
quote:
having been groped and raped, i no longer see the difference between the two.
Somebody shoves you so that you have to balance yourself in a couple of steps.
Somebody punches you in the face repeatedly, and so hard that your nose is broken, a couple of teeth are knocked out, and you get a concussion.
Do you see any difference between the two?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-14-2007 7:41 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2007 3:42 PM nator has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 147 of 221 (428232)
10-15-2007 3:42 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by nator
10-15-2007 3:38 PM


Re: Sex abuse v. rape
being randomly grabbed in a crowded nightclub.
being groped by your friend's dad in her bedroom after church.
do you see the difference?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by nator, posted 10-15-2007 3:38 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by nator, posted 10-15-2007 3:50 PM macaroniandcheese has replied
 Message 175 by Rrhain, posted 10-16-2007 11:31 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 148 of 221 (428235)
10-15-2007 3:50 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by macaroniandcheese
10-15-2007 3:42 PM


Re: Sex abuse v. rape
quote:
being randomly grabbed in a crowded nightclub.
being groped by your friend's dad in her bedroom after church.
do you see the difference?
Yes.
The former is a stranger doing something inappropriate, but it is a public place, and you can take action by involving the bouncer or the police. Presumably, if you are in a nightclub, you are also an adult, and the "perp" is someone roughly in your own age group. Also, sexual tension and display is expected to be present in a nightclub so people in attendance would likely be prepared for such behavior.
The latter is in secret, a trusted parental figure, in his house (both factors tip the power dynamic), is much older (also tips the power dynamic), and is the father of your friend (which makes calling attention to the situation very difficult, becasue you don't want to hurt her), and (if I assume correctly) the victim of abuse was underage or at least very young, therefore tipping the power dynamic again.
Now, why don't you answer my question?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2007 3:42 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2007 4:01 PM nator has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 149 of 221 (428237)
10-15-2007 4:01 PM
Reply to: Message 148 by nator
10-15-2007 3:50 PM


Re: Sex abuse v. rape
for me, the circumstances of my rape brought the same issues and questions as that second scenario. therefore, to me, they were the same. the violation felt the same and i felt equally powerless.
as far as i'm concerned, that has nothing to do with being pushed or being punched.
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by nator, posted 10-15-2007 3:50 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by nator, posted 10-15-2007 4:23 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 150 of 221 (428241)
10-15-2007 4:23 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by macaroniandcheese
10-15-2007 4:01 PM


Re: Sex abuse v. rape
quote:
for me, the circumstances of my rape brought the same issues and questions as that second scenario. therefore, to me, they were the same. the violation felt the same and i felt equally powerless.
If someone is traumatized by a sexual assault in her past, it may certainly influence her reactions to any future unwanted contact that she perceives as sexual. But that doesn't make all unwanted contact equivalent.
The adult in the nightclub and the kid(?) getting molested by her friend's dad in a bedroom in his house weren't actually equally powerless, for the reasons I mentioned.
The analogy I was attempting to draw with the single shove and the severely damaging punching is that they are both a form of assault, but they differ in order of magnitude that is obvious to anyone looking from the outside.
Similarly, someone, for example, grabbing my ass in a crowded nightclub is certainly unwanted, but it is NOT equivalent to being forcibly, penetratively raped, even though I may have strong emotional reactions to each event.
They are physically different in order of magnitude regardless of my reaction to the events. That is obvious.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2007 4:01 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2007 4:29 PM nator has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024