|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: God and Sheri S. Tepper | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geno Inactive Member |
Sounds great!
Let me throw a quote out. As I implied, I haven't really made up my mind about Atheism or Deism (or Agnosticism for that matter). I saw in a different topic that you gave a website for Atheism and I thought, hey--I wonder if Deism has one? Believe it or not, they do! No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.deism.com The quote I have is from a different site, however:
quote: Of course, the grand-daddy of American Deism is Thomas Payne. [there-that puts us back in good graces with the "book nook" theme!] Sorry for that long summation, but I felt I had to define the position somewhat if I was going to continue to espouse it (or ultimately reject it!) Would you agree that Atheism shares tenets 1, 2 and 5? Tenet 3 is problematic. Some parts you would probably accept, others of course will not work. Tenet 4 is probably the heart of the difference though, wouldn't you agree? If you find the exercise interesting, I would like to hear your reaction overall to the quote and then an Atheist position on the tenets (amplify as you like). Thanks!Geno
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
is this derived from personal experience? That, and statistical evidence. No force intercedes in human events in a way distinguishable from random chance. Suffering and happiness are distributed at random.
i guess my point is is that i could say God is a personal God.the only evidence that i exist to you is that i am typing back to you,however does this mean because you have relatively no scientific evidence , that means i do not exist? Your text is in fact scientific evidence of your existence. So I don't know what your point is with this. God's never posted on any internet message boards, to my knowledge; he's certainly never talked to me personally; and the Bible does not impress me as the "word of god" or whatever. it's obviously the words of all-too-human people. Anyway, I love to talk to people, so I'm certainly happy to talk to you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mike the wiz Member Posts: 4752 From: u.k Joined: |
'Your text is in fact scientific evidence of your existence.'
so then why is nt Jesus' text proof of his existance to you crash? 'Anyway, I love to talk to people, so I'm certainly happy to talk to you.' ok, i just thought you were a bit angry with me , i called you self righteouss once when i was not meant to (general human condition)i am sorry about that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zephyr Member (Idle past 4551 days) Posts: 821 From: FOB Taji, Iraq Joined: |
quote:Atheism as I see it, and as I lean toward it (though not quite embracing it) would readily agree with those. quote:Well, in crash's words, that's the kind of God that we may as well forget about. I mean, what kind of a relationship can one have with a silent and invisible deity? One-sided, to say the least, absent of feedback. Impossible to verify, and thus based on a truly blind faith. Still, for a deist and an atheist, the ultimate conclusion seems the same: supernatural intervention doesn't happen. quote:Again, for practical purposes, (though this one is maybe more open to argument) I find this tenet and the probable atheist response equivalent for practical purposes. Most atheists I know are well-educated in the natural sciences, at least compared to the average layman. They believe in free, rational thought and working to avoid human suffering. While not necessarily striving for perfection or believing themselves to be the image of God, many work for the good of others and, in doing so, could be said to achieve virtue through their conduct.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17822 Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Are you claiming to know of a document actually written by Jesus ?
An original ? Or even a copy ? And if you did have one would that not just be evidence of Jesus, the man ? It wouldn't surprise me if there was a real historical person behind the stories in the Gospels.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zephyr Member (Idle past 4551 days) Posts: 821 From: FOB Taji, Iraq Joined: |
quote:That's not a great comparison. The gospels themselves do not claim to be written by Jesus. Each one is *proof* that somebody existed in the past and wrote a book, but not really proof of anything else. Crash didn't say your posting here was proof that everything you say is true, accurate, inspired by God, and inspiring enough to change his whole life, did he? I know, based on my understanding of the system I am using right now, that the most likely explanation for the words I see on my screen is this: Somebody, somewhere, sits at a terminal much like mine and enters text via a keyboard or other device, also much like mine. By entering commands in the computer, which are translated to machine language and processed by a CPU, he causes this text to be encoded and transmitted via electrical and/or light pulses through a series of switches and routers to a server which formats the text and allows me to receive it via a similar process, and my computer displays the text on my screen. This person uses the name "mike the wiz" to identify his posts among those of other members. This is a reasonable conclusion because it can be explained in detail by mechanisms I have observed and understand. It makes no unnecessary assumptions, and allows me to build on this knowledge by associating you with a particular identity and beliefs of which you have shared some. For example, I may assume your name is Mike and you're a creationist seeking further scientific knowledge. However, I'm open to other possibilities, because those things would not be verified unless I met you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mike the wiz Member Posts: 4752 From: u.k Joined: |
'This is a reasonable conclusion because it can be explained in detail 'by mechanisms I have observed and understand. It makes no unnecessary assumptions, and allows me to build on this knowledge by associating you with a particular identity and beliefs of which you have shared some. For example, I may assume your name is Mike and you're a creationist seeking further scientific knowledge. However, I'm open to other possibilities, because those things would not be verified unless I met you.'
you have answered well , and very logically may i add. you are also right i have shared beliefs of mine with you,also i have not lied or offered you anything because ther is no reward or purpose in doing so. 'That's not a great comparison. The gospels themselves do not claim to be written by Jesus' however when Jesus speaks they do claim that those are the words he said.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mike the wiz Member Posts: 4752 From: u.k Joined: |
'Are you claiming to know of a document actually written by Jesus ?'
no ,(i am not claiming anything i am pointing at the facts). not directly but if God Jesus and the holy spirit are the trinity then the people who wrote his words were directly influenced by the holy spirit.i also remember a scripture which says (not qouted however)neither think what you shall say because it will be the holy spirit that speaks.i could ask you are you claiming that there is no gospel?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mike the wiz Member Posts: 4752 From: u.k Joined: |
'it's obviously the words of all-too-human people'
it is the inspired word of God -not 'whatever' also this is a very convenient conclusion as you are not a witness to God, however i think a fantastic and intelligent mind called 'crashfrog' IS a brilliant and special design made by God , and i have eperienced God ,no he has not directly spoke to me but if some of the things that have happened to me are chance then i expect to win the lottery every day from now on.dismissing the bible completly from your mind as human words is illogical,the witnesses are thousands are they all lying?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zephyr Member (Idle past 4551 days) Posts: 821 From: FOB Taji, Iraq Joined: |
quote:Right. At the moment I have no reason to think so. All I'm saying is that I wouldn't put money on my idea of who you are. It's not personal quote:Of course they do. They claim it. There's plenty of room for skepticism about the origin and accuracy of the texts, as well as the person of Jesus himself. Today, the only people who seem to hear from him are those who choose to. Again, skeptic's field day. Our minds play tricks on us all the time. Even St. Augustine said that most people who thought God was talking to them had simply imagined what they expected him to say.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zephyr Member (Idle past 4551 days) Posts: 821 From: FOB Taji, Iraq Joined: |
quote:People tend to forget (or never learn) that the odds of something happening are often unrelated to past results. A coin toss is a memoryless system, as are many chance events. I've seen people interpret some seriously mundane events as acts of God, just because they were so convinced that all good came from him. It's more about perspective than anything else.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mike the wiz Member Posts: 4752 From: u.k Joined: |
'I've seen people interpret some seriously mundane events as acts of God, just because they were so convinced that all good came from him. It's more about perspective than anything else.'
but when you ask for very very specific thing to happen and it happens that surely is answered prayer , will you concede that?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 8996 From: Canada Joined: |
but when you ask for very very specific thing to happen and it happens that surely is answered prayer , will you concede that?
No I wouldn't. There are a very large number of prayers uttered everyday. And a large number of things happen everyday. There are almost certainly going to be coincidental joinings of those 2 things. It would require more than individual anecdotal uncontrolled instances to be very meaningful to me. I'm a bit stubborn.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1467 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
but when you ask for very very specific thing to happen and it happens that surely is answered prayer , will you concede that? Not really, because of all the prayers that humans utter, the vast, vast majority (99%+) go totally and completely unanswered. (Unless you think an implied "no" counts as an answer. ) Especially prayers to "know God's will." In every study I've heard of, people who think they're praying and getting god's will wind up reporting their own particular will on whatever subject. If everybody who prays to now god's will winds up recieveing god's will, how come they almost never agree with each other on what that will is? It's like, why do indian rain dances work? Because they dance until it rains. Eventually, everything that could reasonably happen, happens. It's not answered prayer, just random chance through the filter of human experience. [This message has been edited by crashfrog, 06-12-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
zephyr Member (Idle past 4551 days) Posts: 821 From: FOB Taji, Iraq Joined: |
quote:There is always a chance of you getting the particular thing you wanted. Maybe it would have happened if you hadn't prayed, but nobody ever thinks about that. It means nothing unless compared to the number of times you ask for a very very specific thing and get the complete opposite. Of course, there's always an explanation: you didn't pray enough, you prayed selfishly, God answered but he just said no, etc. etc.... IMHO, these have all been manufactured to explain why prayer is not effective in real life as it was in the Bible, and why even the most faithful believers cannot tell a mountain to move from here to there.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024