Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Has EvCForum ever changed anyone's mind?
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 1 of 32 (50525)
08-14-2003 9:29 AM


I'm just wondering whether anyone has ever been persuaded to change their mind from evolution to creationism, or creationism to evolution by coming here?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Andya Primanda, posted 08-15-2003 2:30 AM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 4 by Silent H, posted 08-15-2003 2:35 PM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 5 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-15-2003 2:44 PM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 6 by truthlover, posted 08-15-2003 3:16 PM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 7 by doctrbill, posted 08-16-2003 12:29 AM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 8 by AdminTC, posted 08-16-2003 8:05 PM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 12 by Agent Uranium [GPC], posted 08-18-2003 5:54 PM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 17 by Brad McFall, posted 09-09-2003 1:39 PM Dr Jack has not replied

Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 32 (50632)
08-15-2003 2:30 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
08-14-2003 9:29 AM


Well, a guy named Delshad was once a creationist, but he switched sides after some productive discussion here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 08-14-2003 9:29 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Quetzal, posted 08-15-2003 4:20 AM Andya Primanda has not replied

Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5890 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 3 of 32 (50633)
08-15-2003 4:20 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Andya Primanda
08-15-2003 2:30 AM


Hi Andya,
Did Delshad really "switch sides"? I remember he came on here more-or-less guns blazing, and ended by agreeing that some of us had good points, but did he really change is mind from creationist to evolutionist? If so, that's pretty cool.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Andya Primanda, posted 08-15-2003 2:30 AM Andya Primanda has not replied

Silent H
Member (Idle past 5838 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 4 of 32 (50669)
08-15-2003 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
08-14-2003 9:29 AM


I have not had anyone change my mind about evolution/creation, but I have had my mind changed about Biblical messages.
Rrhain just this week has convinced me that all references to homosexuality in the Bible, are specified to acts with male prostitutes. I knew some were, but not that all were.
The most asinine part of the evolution/creation debate is that (my experience here) that even when creationists are granted large leeway to make their argument, they suddenly cut and run.
It's as if all they wanted to do is complain that evos won't listen, and start with a half ass argument anyone with common sense can see problems with. Then you say, okay well let's say that's true, then what about this that follows from that? Whoosh they are gone.
Did they not think past the first argument? Looks like it to me.
If anything I have lost all respect for creationists and--- especially--- IDIOT Theorists (which stands for Intelligent Design and Inferred Organic Teleology).
------------------
holmes

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 08-14-2003 9:29 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by TrueCreation, posted 08-16-2003 8:13 PM Silent H has not replied
 Message 11 by MrHambre, posted 08-18-2003 10:04 AM Silent H has not replied
 Message 14 by Zealot, posted 09-09-2003 12:51 PM Silent H has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3944
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 5 of 32 (50670)
08-15-2003 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
08-14-2003 9:29 AM


TC: YEC to OEC
It seems that TrueCreation has made the transition from a well defined YEC (Young Earth Creationist) position, to some highly muddled version of OECism (Old Earth Creationism).
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 08-14-2003 9:29 AM Dr Jack has not replied

truthlover
Member (Idle past 4077 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 6 of 32 (50673)
08-15-2003 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
08-14-2003 9:29 AM


I didn't switch here, but I was converted away from Young Earth Creationism on the CompuServe Religious forum in 1994.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 08-14-2003 9:29 AM Dr Jack has not replied

doctrbill
Member (Idle past 2783 days)
Posts: 1174
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Joined: 01-08-2001


Message 7 of 32 (50692)
08-16-2003 12:29 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
08-14-2003 9:29 AM


In part thanks to this debate, I have learned that the problems with literal interpretation of Genesis run deeper than I had previously imagined. I would like to thank the Bible buffs here, on both sides of the debate, whose challenges and insights have strengthened my conviction. Yep. I've become more skeptical. But, at the same time, my respect for the holy script has increased.
Thanks to the the reactions of our opponents I have learned where hot buttons may be found and how to activate some of the ejection seats. Thanks to our colleagues I am learning how to smile politely while quietly adjusting the timer on my "bomb." But it's rarely that dramatic. Usually it's the Johnny Appleseed approach. Planting thoughts. Swatting flies.
db

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 08-14-2003 9:29 AM Dr Jack has not replied

AdminTC
Inactive Junior Member


Message 8 of 32 (50740)
08-16-2003 8:05 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
08-14-2003 9:29 AM


"m just wondering whether anyone has ever been persuaded to change their mind from evolution to creationism, or creationism to evolution by coming here? "
--Yes. I don't know exactly when, but probably about after the first 8-14 months on the board I altered my POV from a Young Earth Creationist to something of which I have no term. Basically I am a "creationist" who really doesn't claim to know, or ascribe, to a certain age of the earth. Though from my scientific studies I think the earth could be no younger than a couple hundred thousand years, probably a few My(but that is just ambiguous speculation on my part). The earth may very well be 4.6 By, and a global flood as given in genesis may never have occured. I am merely 17 and have my life to engage in studies and uncover the veracity of a global flood and a younger earth than given in uniformitarian geology.
The alteration in my POV while being influenced very much by my many discussions in this forum has also been influenced greatly by my independent research in geology and various geosciences.
--Sorry, this is a TC post, forgot to turn of admin-mode.
[This message has been edited by AdminTC, 08-16-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 08-14-2003 9:29 AM Dr Jack has not replied

TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 32 (50741)
08-16-2003 8:13 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Silent H
08-15-2003 2:35 PM


"It's as if all they wanted to do is complain that evos won't listen, and start with a half ass argument anyone with common sense can see problems with. Then you say, okay well let's say that's true, then what about this that follows from that? Whoosh they are gone. "
--I've been dying for some input by someone with plenty of well founded knowledge in geomagnetism and the geomagnetic record in my thread here:
http://EvC Forum: Geomagnetism and the rate of Sea-floor Spreading -->EvC Forum: Geomagnetism and the rate of Sea-floor Spreading
--I havent dashed and ran there so if you have something to say to the uninformed creationist please do so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Silent H, posted 08-15-2003 2:35 PM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by doctrbill, posted 08-16-2003 11:04 PM TrueCreation has not replied

doctrbill
Member (Idle past 2783 days)
Posts: 1174
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Joined: 01-08-2001


Message 10 of 32 (50746)
08-16-2003 11:04 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by TrueCreation
08-16-2003 8:13 PM


Hi TC,
Love your avatar. It is rather stylized but I appreciate a hoisted tee shirt anytime.
db

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by TrueCreation, posted 08-16-2003 8:13 PM TrueCreation has not replied

MrHambre
Member (Idle past 1411 days)
Posts: 1495
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 11 of 32 (50833)
08-18-2003 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Silent H
08-15-2003 2:35 PM


I don't think a website like this one is supposed to change anyone's mind. However, I'll admit that I was once a hardline atheist who felt that science supported my views. Nowadays I'm more realistic about what science can and cannot tell us. I'm no believer, but I understand the inability of science to solve our philosophical problems.
Science isn't here to make us feel good. If it doesn't back up our cherished little beliefs (whether they involve a Big Magic Guy, the absence of one, or the racial superiority of our particular group), then we either have to hold these beliefs on faith or discard them.
I've really enjoyed my participation on this site, and I've already learned a lot from the many intelligent folks who post here. I agree with holmes, though, that not everyone is here to learn. I wish there were some way to distinguish people who really want to educate themselves from those who are just after attention, because usually we find out after too much time and effort has been wasted trying to engage them.
------------------
En la tierra de ciegos, el tuerto es el Rey.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Silent H, posted 08-15-2003 2:35 PM Silent H has not replied

Agent Uranium [GPC]
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 32 (50904)
08-18-2003 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
08-14-2003 9:29 AM


No. I support "evolutionism" and haven't felt drawn to creationism after reading all these discussions. This place has, however, opened my eyes in terms of learning lots of new things, information, links to deeply researched studies on various topics, civil people, etc.
I feel glad for having happed upon this little place!
------------------
quote:
All the boys think she's a spy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 08-14-2003 9:29 AM Dr Jack has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1485 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 13 of 32 (50919)
08-18-2003 7:10 PM


I'll tell you what it's done for me - turned me into an unstoppable juggernaut of rhetorical precision when I argue with people I know. It's like I'm training at the dojo or something. I'm a Knowledge Kninja!

Zealot
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 32 (54573)
09-09-2003 12:51 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Silent H
08-15-2003 2:35 PM


Rrhain just this week has convinced me that all references to homosexuality in the Bible, are specified to acts with male prostitutes. I knew some were, but not that all were.
I'd love to hear Rrhain's argument for that. I dont think it holds any ground though.
As for the question, nope, not been converted and I wont be, however in general the quality of conversation had been pretty good and informing.
[This message has been edited by Zealot, 09-09-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Silent H, posted 08-15-2003 2:35 PM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by MrHambre, posted 09-09-2003 1:12 PM Zealot has replied
 Message 16 by Loudmouth, posted 09-09-2003 1:32 PM Zealot has not replied

MrHambre
Member (Idle past 1411 days)
Posts: 1495
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 15 of 32 (54578)
09-09-2003 1:12 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Zealot
09-09-2003 12:51 PM


Zealot,
You continually display the open-mindedness and thirst for knowledge that we have come to expect from fundamentalists. In thread after thread you have put forth arguments ranging from the well-worn to the utterly bizarre in a transparent attempt to disprove a well-supported scientific theory you barely understand.
Now you want to hear Rrhain's theory concerning the Bible's references to homosexuality. However, you state that you doubt it's valid before you've even heard it!!!
Thanks for your contributions to our discussions here.
------------------
I would not let the chickens cross the antidote road because I was already hospitlized for trying to say this!-Brad McFall

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Zealot, posted 09-09-2003 12:51 PM Zealot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Zealot, posted 09-10-2003 11:03 AM MrHambre has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024