Could you attempt a revision where you use paragraphs and capitalization so I can give better suggestions?
Think of it as a bit of easy homework! Concentrate on the punctuation and polish the opening post up a bit so that we can then promote your topic. I know that we sound a bit like annoying English teachers, but we like to make our Opening Posts look concise, to the point, and on point! Let me show you an example, using your own opening post
This is my version...feel free to use or modify any of my suggestions)
AdminPhats revision(suggestion)
AdminPhat revision writes:
I'm sure many of you are familiar with the many laws of thermodynamics. I’ve seen many articles that were totally stupid and painfully misrepresented that argue evolution impossible via thermodynamics, so I’ve decided to throw physics back in their face!
One can extract a very important principal from even the most basic
laws of thermodynamics:
Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only changed in nature, right? All matter and energy has always been in the universe, and any other situation could never have arisen. Perhaps the "big bang" was not so much a beginning, as it was simply a massive rearrangement.
To say a force or individual created the universe goes against laws that have been since the beginning of time, and have become widely understood and accepted.
In order to understand this you have to extend your mind, and let go of linear thinking that everything must have a beginning, middle, and end. that is the nature of life, but not the nature of energy and matter. Any comments?
Also, we would have to select a forum to put the topic in. Where would you put it>? Cosmology? Is It Science? Get back to us with your own revision if you still want to promote the topic.
PB
This message has been edited by AdminPhat, 11-25-2005 06:51 AM