Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 50 (9179 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,208 Year: 5,465/9,624 Month: 490/323 Week: 130/204 Day: 4/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Darwinism Is Going Downhill
ChemEngineer
Junior Member
Posts: 18
From: Irvine CA 92606
Joined: 03-10-2024


Message 1 of 4 (916853)
03-14-2024 9:32 PM


Evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins, has written books and made videos making claims that simply do not hold up. One such claim is that evolution must always go "uphill," to an improved version of the organism, in our case, humans.
Follow the facts and graphs showing exactly the opposite, with Dawkins and his atheist colleagues, who endlessly crow about being "brights," i.e. smarter than anyone else, failing pretty miserably at the Evolutionary Imperative - making as many copies of themselves as possible.
________________________
“There can be no going downhill - species can’t get worse as a prelude to getting better.” – Page 91, Climbing Mount Improbable, by Richard Dawkins

“It cannot be said often enough that Darwinian theory does not allow for getting temporarily worse in quest of a long-term goal.” – Ibid, Page 132


“At the end of many generations of cumulative finding, a designoid object is produced which may make us gasp with admiration at the perfection of its apparent design.” – Ibid, Page 28
We shall now “gasp with admiration at the perfection” of the apparent design of Darwinian “selection” today.

PICTURE OF Neza Chalco Itza slum, near Mexico City

Slums are the fastest growing, i.e. Darwinian, human habit on earth today. Worldwide, over one billion humans live in them, 24% of all humanity.

“Going down the slopes of Mount Improbable is not allowed by natural selection.” The billion plus humans living in slums are not going up any slopes other than trash.

Making copies of ourselves “is every living object’s sole reason for living.” – Richard Dawkins

Then Dawkins and his atheist accomplices are all losing the evolutionary battle, and for them, what else is there, really?
While religiously unaffiliated people currently make up 16% of the global population, only an estimated 10% of the world’s newborns between 2010 and 2015 were born to religiously unaffiliated mothers..
By 2055 to 2060, just 9% of all babies will be born to religiously unaffiliated women, while more than seven-in-ten will be born to either Muslims (36%) or Christians (35%). – PewResearch.org/religion/2017/04/05

We could call this “The Tragedy of the Brights,” as they like to call themselves in smug, pretend superiority.

The least educated of the world are the most Darwinian:

GRAPH of education level versus fertility rate, showing African fertility

This is in stark contrast to some of the racist and anti-prophetic words of Charles Darwin, whose first book was titled, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.
“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world.” – Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, Chapter 3
The ten most fertile countries in the world are all populated by what Darwin referred to as “savages” or “dark races”.

1. Niger: 7.27 children per woman.
2. Angola: 6.57 children per woman.
3. Democratic Republic of the Congo: 6.54 children per woman.
4. Mali: 6.49 children per woman.
5. Benin: 6.48 children per woman.
6. Chad: 6.47 children per woman.
7. Uganda: 6.45 children per woman.
8. Somalia: 6.43 children per woman.
9. South Sudan: 6.42 children per woman.
10. Burundi: 6.41 children per woman1. (Statista.com)

The least educated also happen to be the least developed:

GRAPH of fertility rate versus Development Index of the respective country

And the poorest:

GRAPH of fertility rate versus GDP per capita

In conclusion, Darwinism and its atheist advocates in particular, such as Richard Dawkins, married three times and only one child, are evolutionary failures.

I do not know how to insert pictures into a post, as this is my first day here.
THE END
OF DARWINISM….

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 03-15-2024 1:32 AM ChemEngineer has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Inactive Administrator


(2)
Message 2 of 4 (916857)
03-15-2024 1:32 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by ChemEngineer
03-14-2024 9:32 PM


Another copy of your previously rejected proposed topic - REJECTED AGAIN
The previous "version":
The Miserable End of Darwinian Evolution
Adminnemooseus

Or something like that©.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ChemEngineer, posted 03-14-2024 9:32 PM ChemEngineer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by ChemEngineer, posted 03-27-2024 8:26 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
ChemEngineer
Junior Member
Posts: 18
From: Irvine CA 92606
Joined: 03-10-2024


Message 3 of 4 (917230)
03-27-2024 8:26 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Adminnemooseus
03-15-2024 1:32 AM


Re: Another copy of your previously rejected proposed topic - REJECTED AGAIN
You're extremely biased toward Darwinian evolution, and obviously dislike any
post contrary to your archaic bias.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 03-15-2024 1:32 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Admin, posted 03-28-2024 10:37 AM ChemEngineer has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13084
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 4 of 4 (917249)
03-28-2024 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by ChemEngineer
03-27-2024 8:26 PM


Re: Another copy of your previously rejected proposed topic - REJECTED AGAIN
I make the same suggestions I did the first time you posted this:
Your submission does not meet EvC Forum's standards for beginning a new thread. You are welcome to try to improve your opening post. I would suggest beginning with an introductory paragraph that outlines what you hope to accomplish in your thread, followed by a rough outline of your line of argument.

Another suggestion: Quotes should be used sparingly and only to support a point that you've made yourself, not to make your point for you.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by ChemEngineer, posted 03-27-2024 8:26 PM ChemEngineer has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024