Its a very simple and logical question. If you can't answer it, then I don't understand why anyone is still arguing about this.
If I could choose to believe whatever I wanted, I would probably still be a Taoist. I certainly wouldn’t have let myself become a material atheist! But I can’t choose what I will believe. I would rather not believe some of the things I do; But I had no choice but to accept everything I believe now as the most logical conclusion according to evidence that didn't require any faith to verify. Its not important to me what I believe, but it is important that I be able to show just cause for that belief. So to all proponents of evangelical Biblical creationism participating in this forum, I ask,
why should I believe anything about your position, as opposed to that of Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Shaman, Shinto, Zoroastrian, or any other variant of creationism, or that of evolutionists of any faith or none?
I'm not looking for criticisms against the credibility of any other position, but for some sort of objectively-demonstrable evidence which actually indicates Biblical creationism over any other explanation.
Please try to be brief, but still give me the best answer you've got. Please answer only this one question as it was phrased, as best you can. Then we'll compare your reasons to see which ones really make sense. If you won't or can't answer, that will certainly count for something too.